
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A critical comparative review of evidence on alternative instruments for supporting research and innovation in agri-food systems in the Global South

Financial support is a critical enabling factor for healthy agri-food innovation systems, particularly within resource-limited settings, though additional forms of support are also necessary. This motivated a critical comparative review of evidence in peer-reviewed and gray literature on the range of instruments that support innovation in agri-food systems in the Global South, toward achieving sustainable agriculture intensification. The main aim is to provide recommendations to innovation managers on the choice of different instruments for supporting innovation. The key guiding questions for the comparative analysis were whether the instrument fosters uptake of innovation and whether it promotes inclusive development. A review of the literature was supplemented with a scan of websites for sources of peer-reviewed and gray literature documenting the application of the 12 selected instruments. The study revealed three categories of instruments: (Type A) those that support entrepreneurship; (Type B) those that primarily finance innovation; and (Type C) those that support innovation in real-life contexts. Our analysis indicates that innovation managers and funders need to select instruments that are likely to fit the specific context as well as to address the mandates of their organizations, and in so doing, they must consider how to ensure the sustainability of their investments and meet the needs of their beneficiaries. This review represents one of a handful that have compared the use of multiple instruments across multiple continents in the Global South, and can serve as an important decision-making tool for investors and funders looking to invest in agri-food innovation systems.
- Kansas State University United States
- Human Sciences Research Council South Africa
- Kansas State University United States
- Arkansas State University United States
- Forum for agricultural research in Africa United Kingdom
decision support, Inclusive Innovation, Knowledge management, Resource (disambiguation), Frugal Innovation in Emerging Markets, Social Sciences, Business, Management and Accounting, Food processing and manufacture, Innovation Methodologies, innovation systems, FOS: Economics and business, Context (archaeology), Management of Technology and Innovation, Analysis of Impact Investing in Finance and Social Policy, TX341-641, Business, Business and International Management, Biology, agriculture, inclusive development, Marketing, Computer network, Geography, Ecology, evidence, Nutrition. Foods and food supply, Entrepreneurship, TP368-456, Living Labs in Open Innovation Networks, Computer science, Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sustainability, Archaeology, FOS: Biological sciences, Policy Innovation, Finance
decision support, Inclusive Innovation, Knowledge management, Resource (disambiguation), Frugal Innovation in Emerging Markets, Social Sciences, Business, Management and Accounting, Food processing and manufacture, Innovation Methodologies, innovation systems, FOS: Economics and business, Context (archaeology), Management of Technology and Innovation, Analysis of Impact Investing in Finance and Social Policy, TX341-641, Business, Business and International Management, Biology, agriculture, inclusive development, Marketing, Computer network, Geography, Ecology, evidence, Nutrition. Foods and food supply, Entrepreneurship, TP368-456, Living Labs in Open Innovation Networks, Computer science, Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sustainability, Archaeology, FOS: Biological sciences, Policy Innovation, Finance
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
