
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Ocean Energy Systems Wave Energy Modelling Task: Modelling, Verification and Validation of Wave Energy Converters

doi: 10.3390/jmse7110379
handle: 10468/9303 , 11583/2835294
The International Energy Agency Technology Collaboration Programme for Ocean Energy Systems (OES) initiated the OES Wave Energy Conversion Modelling Task, which focused on the verification and validation of numerical models for simulating wave energy converters (WECs). The long-term goal is to assess the accuracy of and establish confidence in the use of numerical models used in design as well as power performance assessment of WECs. To establish this confidence, the authors used different existing computational modelling tools to simulate given tasks to identify uncertainties related to simulation methodologies: (i) linear potential flow methods; (ii) weakly nonlinear Froude–Krylov methods; and (iii) fully nonlinear methods (fully nonlinear potential flow and Navier–Stokes models). This article summarizes the code-to-code task and code-to-experiment task that have been performed so far in this project, with a focus on investigating the impact of different levels of nonlinearities in the numerical models. Two different WECs were studied and simulated. The first was a heaving semi-submerged sphere, where free-decay tests and both regular and irregular wave cases were investigated in a code-to-code comparison. The second case was a heaving float corresponding to a physical model tested in a wave tank. We considered radiation, diffraction, and regular wave cases and compared quantities, such as the WEC motion, power output and hydrodynamic loading.
- Aalborg University Library (AUB) Aalborg Universitet Research Portal Denmark
- SSPA (Sweden) Sweden
- University of Zurich Switzerland
- Aalborg University Denmark
- University of Hawaiʻi Sea Grant United States
690, Wave energy, Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering, VM1-989, [SPI.MECA.MEFL] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Fluids mechanics [physics.class-ph], computational fluid dynamics, GC1-1581, Computational fluid dynamics, Oceanography, [SPI.MECA.MEFL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Fluids mechanics [physics.class-ph], boundary element method, Boundary element method, [SPI.NRJ]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Electric power, numerical modelling, 600, Boundary element method;, simulation, 620, Numerical modelling, wave energy; numerical modelling; simulation; boundary element method; computational fluid dynamics, Boundary element method; Computational fluid dynamics; Numerical modelling; Simulation; Wave energy, Simulation, wave energy, [SPI.NRJ] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Electric power
690, Wave energy, Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering, VM1-989, [SPI.MECA.MEFL] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Fluids mechanics [physics.class-ph], computational fluid dynamics, GC1-1581, Computational fluid dynamics, Oceanography, [SPI.MECA.MEFL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Fluids mechanics [physics.class-ph], boundary element method, Boundary element method, [SPI.NRJ]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Electric power, numerical modelling, 600, Boundary element method;, simulation, 620, Numerical modelling, wave energy; numerical modelling; simulation; boundary element method; computational fluid dynamics, Boundary element method; Computational fluid dynamics; Numerical modelling; Simulation; Wave energy, Simulation, wave energy, [SPI.NRJ] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Electric power
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).33 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
