<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Design for Additive Manufacturing: A Systematic Review

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 25 Sep 2020Publisher:MDPI AGJournal:Sustainability, volume 12, page 7,936 (eissn: 2071-1050,

Authors: Abdullah Alfaify; Mustafa Saleh; Fawaz M. Abdullah; Abdulrahman M. Al-Ahmari;

doi: 10.3390/su12197936

Design for Additive Manufacturing: A Systematic Review

- Summary
- Subjects
- External Databases
  (2)
- Metrics

Abstract

The last few decades have seen rapid growth in additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. AM has implemented a novel method of production in design, manufacture, and delivery to end-users. Accordingly, AM technologies have given great flexibility in design for building complex components, highly customized products, effective waste minimization, high material variety, and sustainable products. This review paper addresses the evolution of engineering design to take advantage of the opportunities provided by AM and its applications. It discusses issues related to the design of cellular and support structures, build orientation, part consolidation and assembly, materials, part complexity, and product sustainability.

Related Organizations

King Saud University
Saudi Arabia
King Saud University
Saudi Arabia

Keywords

design guidelines, applications, Environmental effects of industries and plants, TJ807-830, additive manufacturing (AM), TD194-195, design for additive manufacturing (DfAM), Renewable energy sources, Environmental sciences, opportunities, GE1-350

3e6d

5g3r

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	115
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%