
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
What Are the Impacts of Social Innovation? A Synthetic Review and Case Study of Community Forestry in the Scottish Highlands

doi: 10.3390/su13084359
In a context of political and economic austerity, social innovation has been presented as a solution to many social challenges, old and new. It aims to support the introduction of new ideas in response to the current urgent needs and challenges of vulnerable groups and seems to offer promising solutions to the challenges faced by rural areas. Yet the evidence base of the impacts on the sustainable development of rural communities remains scarce. In this paper, we explore social innovation in the context of community forestry and provide a brief synthetic review of key themes linking the two concepts. We examine a case of social innovation in the context of community forestry and analyse its type, extent, and scale of impact in a marginalized rural area of Scotland. Using an in-depth case study approach, we apply a mixed research methodology using quantitative indicators of impact as well as qualitative data. Our results show that social innovation reinforces the social dimension of community forestry. Impacts are highlighted across domains (environmental, social, economic, and institutional/governance) but are mainly limited to local territory. We discuss the significance of those results in the context of community forestry as well as for local development. We formulate policy recommendations to foster and sustain social innovation in rural areas.
[SDV.SA.SF]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Silviculture, 330, [SHS.SOCIO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology, TJ807-830, TD194-195, Renewable energy sources, well-being, GE1-350, [SDV.SA.AEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, economy and politics, [SHS.SOCIO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology, scale of impact, Environmental effects of industries and plants, [SDV.SA.AEP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, economy and politics, forestry, Environmental sciences, governance, social impact, [SDV.SA.SF] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Silviculture, forestry, rural development policy
[SDV.SA.SF]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Silviculture, 330, [SHS.SOCIO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology, TJ807-830, TD194-195, Renewable energy sources, well-being, GE1-350, [SDV.SA.AEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, economy and politics, [SHS.SOCIO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology, scale of impact, Environmental effects of industries and plants, [SDV.SA.AEP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, economy and politics, forestry, Environmental sciences, governance, social impact, [SDV.SA.SF] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Silviculture, forestry, rural development policy
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).16 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
