
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Risk Management and Learning Climate in Emergency Contexts: A Qualitative Study

doi: 10.3390/su13105485
handle: 11564/788181
Background: Several researchers have questioned the strategies necessary for effective risk management as well as of human error and its consequences, looking at both positive and negative consequences. Starting from this perspective, this study intended to investigate risk management in the emergency context due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A total of five in-depth interviews were conducted with senior managers of multinationals, asking them to talk about the management of their human capital and the policies of error and safety management adopted in their organizations before, during, and after the pandemic. Results: Qualitative interviews analysis revealed three interesting clusters related to crisis, trust, and risk management; quantitative results, instead, confirmed the existent link between crisis and error management and the strategic role of organizational management in the diffusion of a climate in which is possible to learn from both success and failure. Conclusion: In summary, preliminary results seemed to confirm what emerged from the most recent literature, which is the urgency for organizations to create a culture of intelligent risk-taking that leads to learning and improved knowledge and that includes the participation of all workers. Moreover, this study also underlines the possibility of extending the advantages of Error Management Training in emergency context.
learning from errors, Environmental effects of industries and plants, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Emergency; Innovations; IT risk management; Learning from errors; Post-pandemic; Risk management; Safety management; SDGs; Sustainability, emergency, post-pandemic, Geography, Planning and Development, TJ807-830, IT risk management, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, sustainability, TD194-195, risk management, Renewable energy sources, innovations, Environmental sciences, GE1-350, safety management, SDGs
learning from errors, Environmental effects of industries and plants, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Emergency; Innovations; IT risk management; Learning from errors; Post-pandemic; Risk management; Safety management; SDGs; Sustainability, emergency, post-pandemic, Geography, Planning and Development, TJ807-830, IT risk management, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, sustainability, TD194-195, risk management, Renewable energy sources, innovations, Environmental sciences, GE1-350, safety management, SDGs
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).10 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
