
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Parameter Estimation of Fuel Cells Using a Hybrid Optimization Algorithm

doi: 10.3390/su15086676
Because of the current increase in energy requirement, reduction in fossil fuels, and global warming, as well as pollution, a suitable and promising alternative to the non-renewable energy sources is proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Hence, the efficiency of the renewable energy source can be increased by extracting the precise values for each of the parameters of the renewable mathematical model. Various optimization algorithms have been proposed and developed in order to estimate the parameters of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. In this manuscript, a novel hybrid algorithm, i.e., Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Puffer Fish (HPSOPF), based on the Particle Swarm Optimization and Puffer Fish algorithms, was proposed to estimate the proton exchange membrane fuel cell parameters. The two models were taken for the parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells, i.e., Ballard Mark V and Avista SR-12 model. Firstly, justification of the proposed algorithm was achieved by benchmarking it on 10 functions and then a comparison of the parameter estimation results obtained using the Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Puffer Fish algorithm was done with other meta-heuristic algorithms, i.e., Particle Swarm Optimization, Puffer Fish algorithm, Grey Wolf Optimization, Grey Wolf Optimization Cuckoo Search, and Particle Swarm Optimization Grey Wolf Optimization. The sum of the square error was used as an evaluation metric for the performance evaluation and efficiency of the proposed algorithm. The results obtained show that the value of the sum of square error was smallest in the case of the proposed HPSOPF, while for the Ballard Mark V model it was 6.621 × 10−9 and for the Avista SR-12 model it was 5.65 × 10−8. To check the superiority and robustness of the proposed algorithm computation time, voltage–current (V–I) curve, power–current (P–I) curve, convergence curve, different operating temperature conditions, and different pressure results were obtained. From these results, it is concluded that the Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Puffer Fish algorithm had a better performance in comparison with the other compared algorithms. Furthermore, a non-parametric test, i.e., the Friedman Ranking Test, was performed and the results demonstrate that the efficiency and robustness of the proposed hybrid algorithm was superior.
- Purdue University West Lafayette United States
- Purdue University West Lafayette United States
- Universidad de Ingeniería y Tecnología Peru
- Future University in Egypt Egypt
- Chitkara University India
Environmental effects of industries and plants, TJ807-830, TD194-195, proton exchange membrane fuel cell, Renewable energy sources, modelling, Environmental sciences, GE1-350, parameter estimation, benchmark function
Environmental effects of industries and plants, TJ807-830, TD194-195, proton exchange membrane fuel cell, Renewable energy sources, modelling, Environmental sciences, GE1-350, parameter estimation, benchmark function
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).10 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
