
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Potential Wet Deposition of Nitrogen and Buffer Effect of Floodplain Woods
Nitrogen wet deposition is naturally composed from natural and fertilizer/industrial compounds. We focused on estimations of feedbacks between nitrogen wet deposition (NWD) and the N uptake by floodplain tree species that depend on optimal available nitrogen supply. We estimated The tree wood N uptake from the treering analysis recalculated to the obtained N content in the dry mass. These datasets we compared using 1km grid GIS map algebra over an forested area of the northeast Czech Republic (Central Europe; 6,247 km2; forest cover 21.39%). Present Common ash (Fraxinus excelsior) utilizate about 58.5 t/km2 per year. Willow stands (Salix sp.) utilizate 24.3 t/km2 per year. Potential presented ahswoods on an optimalized area of 2,375 km2 could utilizate upto 1,389 kt per decade while potential willowwoods on 1,177 km2 upto 285.9 kt per decade. 3.3 t/km2 of N per year could fall on ash and/or willow stands. Willows seem to be able to decrease the pressumed N pollution impacts effectivelly for shorttime period while ashwoods for longtime period. However, the tree species pollution bufferpotential is limited due to the overcoming of predicted abovelimit levels of the NWD. A pollution decrease is necessary to continuance in providing of the woods buffer effects.
Proceedings of the 18th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 3-7 May 2010, Lyon, France, pp. 2269-2274
Biomass
Biomass
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
