Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Potential Wet Deposition of Nitrogen and Buffer Effect of Floodplain Woods

Authors: Rychtecká, P.; Bojko, J.; Samec, P.; Sojka, L.;

Potential Wet Deposition of Nitrogen and Buffer Effect of Floodplain Woods

Abstract

Nitrogen wet deposition is naturally composed from natural and fertilizer/industrial compounds. We focused on estimations of feedbacks between nitrogen wet deposition (NWD) and the N uptake by floodplain tree species that depend on optimal available nitrogen supply. We estimated The tree wood N uptake from the tree­ring analysis re­calculated to the obtained N content in the dry mass. These datasets we compared using 1km grid GIS map algebra over an forested area of the north­east Czech Republic (Central Europe; 6,247 km2; forest cover 21.39%). Present Common ash (Fraxinus excelsior) utilizate about 58.5 t/km2 per year. Willow stands (Salix sp.) utilizate 24.3 t/km2 per year. Potential presented ahs­woods on an optimalized area of 2,375 km2 could utilizate upto 1,389 kt per decade while potential willow­woods on 1,177 km2 upto 285.9 kt per decade. 3.3 t/km2 of N per year could fall on ash and/or willow stands. Willows seem to be able to decrease the pressumed N pollution impacts effectivelly for short­time period while ash­woods for long­time period. However, the tree species pollution buffer­potential is limited due to the over­coming of predicted above­limit levels of the NWD. A pollution decrease is necessary to continuance in providing of the woods buffer effects.

Proceedings of the 18th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 3-7 May 2010, Lyon, France, pp. 2269-2274

Keywords

Biomass

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Energy Research