Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio della ricer...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://dx.doi.org/10.5071/26t...
Conference object . 2018
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Hemp Seed Mechanical Harvesting Efficiency Analysis

Authors: Faugno, Salvatore; Sannino, Maura; Crimaldi, Mariano; Caracciolo, Giuseppina; Assirelli, Alberto;

Hemp Seed Mechanical Harvesting Efficiency Analysis

Abstract

Mechanical harvesting of hemp seeds is performed using machines developed for other grain crops in order to allow an easier insertion of hemp cultivation into consolidated production area trying to avoid further purchase of complex and expensive machinery on the territory. On the other hand, it involves the use of machines with low harvesting efficiency because the hemp plants are considerably different from the cereal grain plant having a biomass production 2-3 times bigger than grain in weight. However, hemp seed is harvested when the seed begin to scatter. All these factors combined, lead to a complex setting of the combine harvester. In this paper, harvesting tests were performed in order to evaluate the efficiency of mechanical harvesting of hemp seeds with conventional combine harvester with cereal head, some harvest tests were carried out by varying only the machine setting without significant modifications of the machine. The experimental design included the division of the field into 4 plots, cultivated with a seeding density D1 (60 pt / m2) and D2 (30 pt / m2). Only two plots received foliar fertilization. Each plot has been divided sub-parcels collected with two working speeds of the machine: V1 (3 kmh-1) and V2 (5 kmh-1). The combination of plots configuration provided 8 experimental. The total seed yield per m2 has been obtained hand-picking the seeds in experimental plots divided by agronomic pre-treatments and then cleaned. The harvest efficiency has been calculated comparing the total seed yield with the mechanical seed harvesting using different settings of combine harvester. This work showed an average harvesting efficiency of 68%. Higher efficiency percentage has been obtained on plots with 60 plants/m2 density and harvested at V1 speed. This experience has highlighted some limitations due to the general use of non-specific hemp solutions for harvest, but this result can be explained with different cultivation techniques of hemp.

Proceedings of the 26th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 14-17 May 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 374-377

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
Keywords

Sustainability and the Environment, Forestry, Cannabis sativa; Harvesting hemp seeds; Mechanization; Agronomy and Crop Science; Forestry; Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment; Waste Management and Disposal, Cannabis sativa, Mechanization, Harvesting hemp seeds, Renewable Energy, Biomass, Agronomy and Crop Science, Waste Management and Disposal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average