
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Engaging Local Communities in Low Emissions Land-Use Planning: a Case Study from Laos

handle: 10568/94527
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and enhancing forest carbon stocks (REDD+) is a performance-based payment mechanism currently being debated in international and national environmental policy and planning forums. As the mechanism is based on conditionality, payments must reflect land stewards' level of compliance with carbon-efficient management practices. However, lack of clarity in land governance and carbon rights could undermine REDD+ implementation. Strategies are needed to avoid perverse incentives resulting from the commoditization of forest carbon stocks and, importantly, to identify and secure the rights of legitimate recipients of future REDD+ payments. We propose a landscape-level approach to address potential conflicts related to carbon tenure and REDD+ benefit sharing. We explore various land-tenure scenarios and their implications for carbon ownership in the context of a research site in northern Laos. Our case study shows that a combination of relevant scientific tools, knowledge, and participatory approaches can help avoid the marginalization of rural communities during the REDD+ process. The findings demonstrate that participatory land-use planning is an important step in ensuring that local communities are engaged in negotiating REDD+ schemes and that such negotiations are transparent. Local participation and agreements on land-use plans could provide a sound basis for developing efficient measurement, reporting, and verification systems for REDD+.
- Institute of Geography Switzerland
- Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Indonesia
- University of Queensland Australia
- University of Quensland Australia
- University of Queensland Australia
Participatory land-use planning, Carbon tenure, Montant compensatoire, participatory land-use planning, land use planning, forêt tropicale, FONCIER RURAL, PARTICIPATION POPULAIRE, K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales, 910 Geography & travel, Biology (General), QH540-549.5, Utilisation des terres, Ecology, TELEDETECTION SPATIALE, Equity, Communauté rurale, VILLAGE, CARBONE, 330 Economics, séquestration du carbone, climate change, governance, Laos, protection de la forêt, réduction des émissions, Forêt, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, UTILISATION DU SOL, REDD+, SEQUESTRATION DU CARBONE, E50 - Sociologie rurale et sécurité sociale, P40 - Météorologie et climatologie, QH301-705.5, Approches participatives, carbon tenure, 333, POLITIQUE AGRICOLE, equity, POLLUTION, K70 - Dégâts causés aux forêts et leur protection, DISTRIBUTION SPATIALE, tenure rights, participatory management, carbon, GOUVERNANCE, Déboisement, services écosystémiques, Politique foncière, DEFORESTATION, 2303 Ecology, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_9000119, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_4182, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_331583, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_28075, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_24904, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_15590, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_6700, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_195, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_3062, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_28654, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_1348040570280, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_331597, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_12076
Participatory land-use planning, Carbon tenure, Montant compensatoire, participatory land-use planning, land use planning, forêt tropicale, FONCIER RURAL, PARTICIPATION POPULAIRE, K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales, 910 Geography & travel, Biology (General), QH540-549.5, Utilisation des terres, Ecology, TELEDETECTION SPATIALE, Equity, Communauté rurale, VILLAGE, CARBONE, 330 Economics, séquestration du carbone, climate change, governance, Laos, protection de la forêt, réduction des émissions, Forêt, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, UTILISATION DU SOL, REDD+, SEQUESTRATION DU CARBONE, E50 - Sociologie rurale et sécurité sociale, P40 - Météorologie et climatologie, QH301-705.5, Approches participatives, carbon tenure, 333, POLITIQUE AGRICOLE, equity, POLLUTION, K70 - Dégâts causés aux forêts et leur protection, DISTRIBUTION SPATIALE, tenure rights, participatory management, carbon, GOUVERNANCE, Déboisement, services écosystémiques, Politique foncière, DEFORESTATION, 2303 Ecology, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_9000119, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_4182, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_331583, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_28075, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_24904, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_15590, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_6700, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_195, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_3062, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_28654, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_1348040570280, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_331597, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_12076
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).24 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
