
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Stakeholder engagement and biodiversity conservation challenges in social-ecological systems: some insights from biosphere reserves in western Africa and France

Les réserves de biosphère sont un exemple de systèmes socio-écologiques qui combinent la conservation de la biodiversité et le développement socio-économique avec la génération et la diffusion de connaissances (à la fois scientifiques et locales). Nous passons en revue les enseignements tirés des études de cas sur les réserves de biosphère en Afrique de l'Ouest et en France, soulignant l'importance de l'engagement précoce des parties prenantes pour développer les connaissances afin de parvenir au développement durable. Nous discutons de l'évolution du concept de réserves de biosphère et de son application au fil du temps dans différents contextes socio-économiques et culturels. La diversité des parties prenantes et leurs différents besoins et perceptions en matière de conservation de la nature compliquent les processus de mise en œuvre, entraînant parfois des conflits sur les objectifs et la zonation des réserves de biosphère. Le dialogue entre les différentes parties prenantes doit commencer à un stade précoce de planification et être basé sur le principe de solidarité sociale et écologique. Le dialogue doit ensuite être poursuivi, formalisé, ritualisé et traduit à la fois en termes de gestion des réserves de biosphère et en termes de soutien politique. Il existe des outils et des méthodes qui peuvent faciliter ce dialogue et ce co-apprentissage.
Las reservas de biosfera son un ejemplo de sistemas socioecológicos que combinan la conservación de la biodiversidad y el desarrollo socioeconómico con la generación y difusión de conocimientos (tanto científicos como locales). Revisamos las lecciones aprendidas de los estudios de casos de reservas de biosfera en África occidental y Francia, destacando la importancia de la participación temprana de los interesados para generar conocimiento para lograr el desarrollo sostenible. Discutimos la evolución del concepto de reservas de biosfera y su aplicación a lo largo del tiempo en diferentes entornos socioeconómicos y culturales. La diversidad de los interesados y sus diferentes necesidades y percepciones sobre la conservación de la naturaleza complican los procesos de implementación, lo que a veces resulta en conflictos sobre los objetivos y la zonificación de las reservas de biosfera. El diálogo entre los diferentes interesados debe comenzar en una fase de planificación temprana y basarse en el principio de solidaridad social y ecológica. El diálogo debe buscarse, formalizarse, ritualizarse y traducirse tanto en términos de gestión de reservas de biosfera como en términos de apoyo político. Existen herramientas y métodos que pueden facilitar dicho diálogo y aprendizaje conjunto.
Biosphere reserves are an example of social-ecological systems that combine biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic development with knowledge generation and dissemination (both scientific and local).We review lessons learned from case studies biosphere reserves in western African and France, highlighting the importance of early stakeholder engagement to build knowledge for achieving sustainable development.We discuss the evolution of the concept of biosphere reserves and its application over time in different socioeconomic and cultural settings.The diversity of stakeholders and their different needs and perceptions about nature conservation complicate implementation processes, sometimes resulting in conflicts about the objectives and zonation of biosphere reserves.Dialogue among the different stakeholders must start at an early planning phase and be based on the principle of social and ecological solidarity.Dialogue must then be pursued, formalized, ritualized, and translated both in terms of biosphere reserve management and in terms of political support.Tools and methods exist that can facilitate such dialogue and colearning.
تعد محميات المحيط الحيوي مثالاً على النظم الاجتماعية والبيئية التي تجمع بين الحفاظ على التنوع البيولوجي والتنمية الاجتماعية والاقتصادية وتوليد المعرفة ونشرها (العلمية والمحلية على حد سواء). نستعرض الدروس المستفادة من دراسات الحالة لمحميات المحيط الحيوي في غرب إفريقيا وفرنسا، مع تسليط الضوء على أهمية المشاركة المبكرة لأصحاب المصلحة لبناء المعرفة لتحقيق التنمية المستدامة. نناقش تطور مفهوم محميات المحيط الحيوي وتطبيقه بمرور الوقت في بيئات اجتماعية واقتصادية وثقافية مختلفة. يؤدي تنوع أصحاب المصلحة واحتياجاتهم وتصوراتهم المختلفة حول الحفاظ على الطبيعة إلى تعقيد عمليات التنفيذ، مما يؤدي في بعض الأحيان إلى نزاعات حول أهداف محميات المحيط الحيوي وتقسيمها إلى مناطق. يجب أن يبدأ الحوار بين مختلف أصحاب المصلحة في مرحلة التخطيط المبكر وأن يستند إلى مبدأ التضامن الاجتماعي والبيئي. يجب بعد ذلك متابعة الحوار وإضفاء الطابع الرسمي عليه وطقوسه وترجمته من حيث إدارة محميات المحيط الحيوي ومن حيث الدعم السياسي. توجد أدوات وأساليب يمكن أن تسهل هذا الحوار والتعلم المشترك.
- Radboud University Nijmegen Netherlands
- University of Michigan–Flint United States
- Laboratoire Parole et Langage France
- École des Ponts ParisTech France
- Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement France
550, Sociology and Political Science, FOS: Political science, Social Sciences, Biodiversity conservation, Territorial Governance and Environmental Participation, [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Réserve naturelle, [SHS.ENVIR] Humanities and Social Sciences/Environmental studies, Stakeholder, Rangeland Degradation and Pastoral Livelihoods, Gouvernance, Politique de l'environnement, Evolution and Sustainability of Livestock Farming Systems, Biology (General), Citizen Participation, Environmental resource management, Political science, Sustainable development -- Africa, QH540-549.5, Biosphere reserves -- France -- Case studies, Utilisation des terres, learning, sustainable development, Ecology, Geography, Life Sciences, Biodiversity, Sustainable development -- France -- Case studies, Environmental Participation, Sustainability, E11 - Economie et politique foncières, Physical Sciences, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, Biodiversité, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, Anthropology and Development Studies, Public relations, E50 - Sociologie rurale et sécurité sociale, QH301-705.5, West -- Case studies, Développement rural, gestion des ressources naturelles, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, [ SHS.ENVIR ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Environmental studies, Approches participatives, 333, biosphere reserves, Environmental science, Biosphere, Conservation des ressources, biosphere reserves;learning;social-ecological systems;solidarity;sustainable development, etc. -- Case studies, [ SHS ] Humanities and Social Sciences, Biosphere reserve -- Management -- Case studies, solidarity, Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social ecology -- Structures, Nature reserve, Transhumance, 300, social-ecological systems, Community Engagement, Développement durable, [SHS.ENVIR]Humanities and Social Sciences/Environmental studies, Politique foncière, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Zone protegée, Biosphere reserves -- Africa, Agroecology, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_9000115, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_9000119, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_35332, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_4182, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_6523, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_33949, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_16141, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_37882, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_3081, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_2597, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_6701, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_195, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_7866, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_8355, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_37952
550, Sociology and Political Science, FOS: Political science, Social Sciences, Biodiversity conservation, Territorial Governance and Environmental Participation, [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Réserve naturelle, [SHS.ENVIR] Humanities and Social Sciences/Environmental studies, Stakeholder, Rangeland Degradation and Pastoral Livelihoods, Gouvernance, Politique de l'environnement, Evolution and Sustainability of Livestock Farming Systems, Biology (General), Citizen Participation, Environmental resource management, Political science, Sustainable development -- Africa, QH540-549.5, Biosphere reserves -- France -- Case studies, Utilisation des terres, learning, sustainable development, Ecology, Geography, Life Sciences, Biodiversity, Sustainable development -- France -- Case studies, Environmental Participation, Sustainability, E11 - Economie et politique foncières, Physical Sciences, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, Biodiversité, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, Anthropology and Development Studies, Public relations, E50 - Sociologie rurale et sécurité sociale, QH301-705.5, West -- Case studies, Développement rural, gestion des ressources naturelles, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, [ SHS.ENVIR ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Environmental studies, Approches participatives, 333, biosphere reserves, Environmental science, Biosphere, Conservation des ressources, biosphere reserves;learning;social-ecological systems;solidarity;sustainable development, etc. -- Case studies, [ SHS ] Humanities and Social Sciences, Biosphere reserve -- Management -- Case studies, solidarity, Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social ecology -- Structures, Nature reserve, Transhumance, 300, social-ecological systems, Community Engagement, Développement durable, [SHS.ENVIR]Humanities and Social Sciences/Environmental studies, Politique foncière, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Zone protegée, Biosphere reserves -- Africa, Agroecology, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_9000115, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_9000119, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_35332, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_4182, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_6523, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_33949, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_16141, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_37882, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_3081, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_2597, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_6701, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_195, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_7866, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_8355, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_37952
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).63 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
