<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Appraising weak and strong sustainability: searching for a middle ground

Name: Appraising weak and strong sustainability: searching for a middle ground
Creator: Davies, George Randal
Keywords: Natural resources--Protection, 05 social sciences, Sustainable development--Evaluation, 01 natural sciences, Ecofeminism, 12. Responsible consumption, Sustainability, 13. Climate action, Sustainable development, 11. Sustainability

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 01 Jan 2013 United States English Publisher:ConsilienceJournal:Consilience: journal of sustainable development, volume 10, pages 111-124 (issn: 1948-3074,

Authors: Davies, George Randal;

doi: 10.7916/consilience.v0i10.4635 , 10.7916/d8862g3g , 10.7916/d8tq61zz

Appraising weak and strong sustainability: searching for a middle ground

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This paper seeks to address the ongoing issue of weak and strong sustainability, searching for a middle ground. It discusses the differences between weak and strong sustainability arguing for equality and equity between nature and humankind though movement towards an eco-socio-feminist perspective as an idealist point of view. Through this, full equality and balance may be attained.

Consilience, No 10 (2013): Issue Ten: 2013

Country

United States

Related Organizations

University of Reading
United Kingdom
University of Reading
United Kingdom
Columbia University Libraries, Digital Scholarship
United States
Columbia University Libraries, Digital Scholarship
United States
King’s University
United States

Keywords

Natural resources--Protection, Sustainable development--Evaluation, Ecofeminism, Sustainability, Sustainable development, Conservation of natural resources, Sustainable development--Social aspects, Sustainable development--Environmental aspects

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	33
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%