Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Determination of estradiol receptors by immunoenzyme technique and by radioligand binding in 2134 breast tumors].

Authors: S, Romain; C, Dussert; P M, Martin;

[Determination of estradiol receptors by immunoenzyme technique and by radioligand binding in 2134 breast tumors].

Abstract

In order to test the qualities of the 2 assays, in the same laboratory and on the same tumors, a single-point dextran-coated charcoal radioligand binding assay (RLA-DCC) and Abbott enzyme immunoassay (EIA) were used for more than two years to perform estrogen receptor determinations on cytosols from 2,134 breast cancers. Statistical analysis of the data was performed according to the method of Passing-Bablock. The final regression curve between EIA (y) and RLA-DCC (x) was excellent y = 1.187 X fmol/mg of protein. However, from 1986 to 1988, a great variability was observed for this correlation. We report the study of this variability, which could be explained by several factors, especially calibration problems for the immunoassay kits and changes in our technical team. The binding assay appears to be more sensitive to the technicians' experience than the immunoassay. Technical points are discussed, particularly cytosol preparation and KCl presence or absence in the homogeneisation buffer. The conditions allowing for optimal correlation and routine determination fiability can therefore be defined.

Keywords

Immunoenzyme Techniques, Radioligand Assay, Coal, Cytosol, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Dextrans, Breast, Receptors, Estradiol, Potassium Chloride

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze