
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Please grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
All Research products
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
Temperature-growth responses distinguish the OPC and OPH sibling species within ‘Ophiostoma piceae’

Authors: C.M. Brasier; T.M. Stephens;
Temperature-growth responses distinguish the OPC and OPH sibling species within ‘Ophiostoma piceae’
Abstract
The temperature-growth relationships of a range of isolates representing the recently identified OPC and OPH sibling species within Ophiostoma piceae were studied. Most OPC isolates grew significantly faster than OPH isolates on 2% Oxoid malt extract agar (MEA) between 17·5 and 27·5 °C, but between 27·5° and 30° growth rates of all OPC isolates studied declined rapidly in contrast to those of OPH isolates. The upper limit for growth of OPC isolates of MEA was ca 35°, whereas that for OPH isolates was ca 31°. A simple growth test at 32° on MEa will discriminate between most isolates of the two species, and can be used as a supplementary aid to their identification.
4 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 1981IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2012IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).25 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%

Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
Citations provided by BIP!
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
popularity
Popularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
25
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Fields of Science (3) View all
Fields of Science