Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Respiratory Carearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Respiratory Care
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Respiratory Care
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Respiratory Care
Article . 2014
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

In Vitro Evaluation of Positive Expiratory Pressure Devices Attached to Nebulizers

Authors: Ariel Berlinski;

In Vitro Evaluation of Positive Expiratory Pressure Devices Attached to Nebulizers

Abstract

Patients with cystic fibrosis perform airway clearance techniques and receive nebulized medications on a regular basis. Some positive expiratory pressure (PEP) devices allow concomitant administration of aerosol. I hypothesized that this practice alters the aerosol characteristics and patient dose. I compared the aerosol characteristics and patient dose of nebulized albuterol from 2 types of nebulizer, alone and when connected to different PEP and vibratory PEP devices.Three units of a continuous-output nebulizer (Up-Draft II Opti-Neb) and 3 units of a breath-enhanced nebulizer (LC Plus) were tested alone and connected to PEP devices (Acapella Choice, Acapella Duet, and EzPAP for Up-Draft II Opti-Neb, and Pari PEP at 2 different settings, and Pari PEP S system with the LC Plus). Aerosol characteristics were evaluated with a cooled cascade impaction technique. The nebulizers were loaded with 2.5 mg/3 mL albuterol solution and operated for 4 min at 6 L/min (wall air). Patient dose was evaluated with simulated breathing patterns for a child, small adult, and large adult. Albuterol was assayed via spectrophotometry.Connecting the LC Plus to the PEP devices did not change the aerosol characteristics or patient dose. Connecting the Up-Draft II Opti-Neb to the PEP devices significantly reduced the mass median aerodynamic diameter, from 4.13 μm to 3.72 μm with EzPAP (P = .02), 1.24 μm with Acapella Choice (P < .001), and 1.22 μm with Acapella Duet (P < .001). The total amount of albuterol captured by the impactor decreased when connected to either Acapella Choice (65%) or Acapella Duet (69%), with 17-25% retained in the PEP devices. Patient dose decreased by 76% and 84% when connected to Acapella Choice and Acapella Duet, respectively.Concomitant use of nebulizer and PEP or vibratory PEP devices that obstruct the aerosol pathway significantly decrease the aerosol particle size and the patient dose.

Keywords

Adult, Cystic Fibrosis, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Equipment Design, In Vitro Techniques, Bronchodilator Agents, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Humans, Albuterol, Particle Size, Child

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze