Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of a 1.5T Standard vs. 3T Optimized Protocols in Multiple Sclerosis Patients (P03.053)

Authors: Robert Zivadinov; Sara Hussein; Cheryl Kennedy; David Hojnacki; Ilya Livshits; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman;

Comparison of a 1.5T Standard vs. 3T Optimized Protocols in Multiple Sclerosis Patients (P03.053)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the superiority of the 3T optimized vs. the 1.5T standardized protocols in detecting gadolinium enhancing (GD-E) lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Background Use of post-contrast T1-weighted imaging (WI) is an important tool in diagnosing and predicting the course of MS. Application of optimized imaging strategies has the potential to increase detection of MRI disease activity. Design/Methods: A standard protocol was defined as a 1.5T scan with a single-dose of Gd and a 5-minute scanning delay after injection. An optimized protocol was defined as a 3T MRI scan, using a triple dose of Gd, 20 min scan delay, and using an off-resonance saturated magnetization transfer pulse to reduce the background signal. Fourteen relapsing-remitting MS patients and 3 healthy controls (HC) were scanned with 1.5T standardized and a 3T optimized protocols in random order over 72 hours. Results: There were 47 Gd-E lesions in the MS patients on 3T optimized and 34 on 1.5T standard protocols, a 38.2% increase. There was a significant increase in Gd-enhanced lesion volume (LV) detected with the optimized protocol (179.6%, p Conclusions: The 3T optimized protocol is a useful technique for increasing sensitivity of MRI to detect Gd-E lesions. Disclosure: Dr. Livshits has nothing to disclose. Dr. Hussein has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kennedy has nothing to disclose. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation for activities with Acorda Therapeutics, Biogen Idec, Serono, Inc., Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Teva Neuroscience as a speaker and/or participant on an advisory board. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received research support from Acorda Therapeutics, Biogen Idec, Serono Inc., Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Teva Neuroscience, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, the National Institutes of Health, ITN, Teva Neuroscience, Aspreva-Roche, Acorda Therapeutics and Shire Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Hojnacki has received personal compensation for activities with Biogen Idec, Serono, Inc., Pfizer Inc, and Teva Neuroscience as a speaker and/or participant on scientific advisory boards. Dr. Zivadinov has received personal compensation for activities with Teva Neuroscience, Biogen Idec, EMD Serono, and Questcor Pharmaceuticals as a speaker and/or consultant. Dr. Zivadinov has received research support from Biogen Idec, Teva Neuroscience, Genzyme Corporation, Bracco, Questcor Pharmaceuticals and EMD Serono.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average