
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Modelling the costs of energy crops: A case study of US corn and Brazilian sugar cane

Modelling the costs of energy crops: A case study of US corn and Brazilian sugar cane
Abstract High crude oil prices, uncertainties about the consequences of climate change and the eventual decline of conventional oil production raise the prospects of alternative fuels, such as biofuels. This paper describes a simple probabilistic model of the costs of energy crops, drawing on the user's degree of belief about a series of parameters as an input. This forward-looking analysis quantifies the effects of production constraints and experience on the costs of corn and sugar cane, which can then be converted to bioethanol. Land is a limited and heterogeneous resource: the crop cost model builds on the marginal land suitability, which is assumed to decrease as more land is taken into production, driving down the marginal crop yield. Also, the maximum achievable yield is increased over time by technological change, while the yield gap between the actual yield and the maximum yield decreases through improved management practices. The results show large uncertainties in the future costs of producing corn and sugar cane, with a 90% confidence interval of 2.9–7.2$/GJ in 2030 for marginal corn costs, and 1.5–2.5$/GJ in 2030 for marginal sugar cane costs. The influence of each parameter on these supply costs is examined.
[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances, JEL : [, JEL : ], 338, [ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances, Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources [JEL], [ SHS.GESTION ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, Experience, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources, Uncertainty, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q47 - Energy Forecasting, Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q55 - Technological Innovation [JEL], [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, Biofuels, [SHS.GESTION]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, JEL : Q:Q4:Q47, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q55 - Technological Innovation, Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q47 - Energy Forecasting [JEL], [SHS.GESTION] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, Land suitability, jel: jel:Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q47 - Energy Forecasting, jel: jel:Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q55 - Technological Innovation, jel: jel:Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources
[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances, JEL : [, JEL : ], 338, [ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances, Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources [JEL], [ SHS.GESTION ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, Experience, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources, Uncertainty, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q47 - Energy Forecasting, Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q55 - Technological Innovation [JEL], [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, Biofuels, [SHS.GESTION]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, JEL : Q:Q4:Q47, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q55 - Technological Innovation, Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q47 - Energy Forecasting [JEL], [SHS.GESTION] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, Land suitability, jel: jel:Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q47 - Energy Forecasting, jel: jel:Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q55 - Technological Innovation, jel: jel:Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q4 - Energy/Q.Q4.Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources
1 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2008IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).12 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
