
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Financial performance of English NHS trusts and variation in clinical outcomes: a longitudinal observational study

Financial performance of English NHS trusts and variation in clinical outcomes: a longitudinal observational study
ObjectivesTo examine the association between financial performance as measured by operating margin (surplus/deficit as a proportion of turnover) and clinical outcomes in English National Health Service (NHS) trusts.SettingLongitudinal, observational study in 149 acute NHS trusts in England between the financial years 2011 and 2016.ParticipantsOur analysis focused on outcomes at individual NHS Trust-level (composed of one or more acute hospitals).Primary and secondary outcomesOutcome measures included readmissions, inpatient satisfaction score and the following process measures: emergency department (Accident and Emergency (A&E)) waiting time targets, cancer referral and treatment targets and delayed transfers of care (DTOCs).ResultsThere was a progressive increase in the proportion of trusts in financial deficit: 22% in 2011, 27% in 2012, 28% in 2013, 51% in 2014, 68% in 2015 and 91% in 2016. In linear regression analyses, there was no significant association between operating margin and clinical outcomes (readmission rate or inpatient satisfaction score). There was, however, a significant association between operating margin and process measures (DTOCs, A&E breaches and cancer waiting time targets). Between the best and worst financially performing Trusts, there was an approximately 2-fold increase in A&E breaches and DTOCs overall although this variation decreased over the 6 years. Between the best and worst performing trusts on cancer targets, the magnitude of difference was smaller (1.16 and 1.15-fold), although the variation slowly rose during the 6 years.ConclusionsOperating margins in English NHS trusts progressively worsened during 2011–2016, and this change was associated with poorer performance on several process measures but not with hospital readmissions or inpatient satisfaction. Significant variation exists between the best and worst financially performing Trusts. Further research is needed to examine the causal nature of relationships between financial performance, process measures and outcomes.
- Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovação Portugal
- Harvard University
- University of Oxford United Kingdom
- UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON United Kingdom
- North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust United Kingdom
Patient Transfer, 330, finance, 610, outcomes, Efficiency, Organizational, State Medicine, Neoplasms, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, hospital, 360, Financial Management, Hospital, Hospitals, Hospitalization, England, Linear Models, process measures, Health Services Research, Emergency Service, Hospital
Patient Transfer, 330, finance, 610, outcomes, Efficiency, Organizational, State Medicine, Neoplasms, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, hospital, 360, Financial Management, Hospital, Hospitals, Hospitalization, England, Linear Models, process measures, Health Services Research, Emergency Service, Hospital
12 Research products, page 1 of 2
- 2000IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2006IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2015IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 1996IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).5 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
