

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Species richness influences the spatial distribution of trees in European forests

doi: 10.1111/oik.06776
handle: 10261/238938 , 10396/32140 , 2158/1180055
Species richness influences the spatial distribution of trees in European forests
The functioning of plant communities is strongly influenced by the number of species in the community and their spatial arrangement. This is because plants interact with their nearest neighbors and this interaction is expected to be stronger when the interacting individuals are ecologically similar in terms of resource use. Recent evidence shows that species richness alters the balance of intra‐ versus interspecific competition, but the effect of species richness, and phylogenetic and functional diversity on the spatial pattern of the plant communities remain less studied. Even far, how forest stand structure derived from past management practices can influence the relationship between species richness and spatial pattern is still unknown. Here, we evaluate the spatial distribution of woody individuals (DBH >7.5 cm) in 209 forest stands (i.e. plots) with an increasing level of species richness (from 1 up to 10 species) in six forest types along a latitudinal gradient in Europe. We used completely mapped plots to investigate the spatial pattern in each forest stand with point pattern techniques. We fitted linear models to analyze the effect of species richness (positively correlated with phylogenetic diversity) and functional diversity on tree spatial arrangements. We also controled this relationship by forest type and stand structure as a proxy of the management legacy. Our results showed a generalized positive effect of species richness and functional diversity on the degree of spatial clustering of trees, and on the spatial independence of tree sizes regardless of the forest type. Moreover, current tree spatial arrangements were still conditioned by its history of management; however its effect was independent of the number of species in the community. Our study showed that species richness and functional diversity are relevant attributes of forests influencing the spatial pattern of plant communities, and consequently forest functioning.
570, plant-plant interactions, intraspecific competition, plant–plant interactions, spatial point pattern, intraspecific competition, plant-plant interactions, stand structure, functional diversity, mixed forests, FunDivEurope, Functional diversity, 575, Stand structure, stand structure, Mixed forests, mixed forests, intraspecifc competition, plant plant interactions, ta4112, functional diversity, functional diversity, FunDivEurope, intraspecific competition, mixed forests, plant-plant interactions, spatial point pattern, stand structure, Plant–plant interactions, FunDivEurope, Spatial point pattern, spatial point pattern
570, plant-plant interactions, intraspecific competition, plant–plant interactions, spatial point pattern, intraspecific competition, plant-plant interactions, stand structure, functional diversity, mixed forests, FunDivEurope, Functional diversity, 575, Stand structure, stand structure, Mixed forests, mixed forests, intraspecifc competition, plant plant interactions, ta4112, functional diversity, functional diversity, FunDivEurope, intraspecific competition, mixed forests, plant-plant interactions, spatial point pattern, stand structure, Plant–plant interactions, FunDivEurope, Spatial point pattern, spatial point pattern
5 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2012IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).13 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% visibility views 40 download downloads 25 - 40views25downloads
Data source Views Downloads DIGITAL.CSIC 40 25


