
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Materials Today Proceedings
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Please grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
All Research products
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
Microstructure, Texture and Mechanical Properties Anisotropy of Ni-16Cr and Ni-16Cr-16Mo Solid Solution Alloys in Hot Rolled and Annealed Condition

Authors: Prantik Mukhopadhyay; K.K. Mehta; Rajiv Kumar Mandal; A.K. Singh;
Microstructure, Texture and Mechanical Properties Anisotropy of Ni-16Cr and Ni-16Cr-16Mo Solid Solution Alloys in Hot Rolled and Annealed Condition
Abstract
Abstract Present work describes microstructure-texture-mechanical property anisotropy correlation of Ni-16Cr and Ni-16Cr-16Mo alloys in hot rolled and annealed condition. The high and low SFE values associated with Ni-16Cr and Ni-16Cr-16Mo alloys result in partial recrystallization after recovery and presence of twins in recrystallized grains, respectively. Both the alloys display two-slopes in the true plastic stress-strain curves and follow Ludwigson relation. However, the deformation mechanisms of both the alloys are different. Sample orientation dependent ductility of these alloys has been explained based on dislocation storage capacity and dynamic recovery coefficient using Kock-Mecking-Estrin analysis.
Related Organizations
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2008IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2015IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 1992IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
Citations provided by BIP!
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
popularity
Popularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
1
Average
Average
Average
Fields of Science
Fields of Science