Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparative Microbial Analyses of Freshly Prepared Stored Beef Sausages of Different Vegetable Oils

Authors: OLATUNDE, A.O.;

Comparative Microbial Analyses of Freshly Prepared Stored Beef Sausages of Different Vegetable Oils

Abstract

Freshly prepared beef sausage samples using four different types of vegetable oils; lard, olive oil, Shea butter, groundnut oil and a control sausage prepared without any oil were used in this study. The study was partitioned into five treatments based on the type of oil used and labeled, T1 (Control i.e. without oil), T2 (Lard based), T3 (Olive oil based), T4 (Shea butter based) and T5 (Ground nut oil based). Method of preparation for all sausage samples was same and according to a standard commercial method with all ingredients added equally. The sausage samples were stored at 40C for 20 days. Microbial analyses of samples was done every 5 days beginning from the day of preparation (day 0) up to day 20 following the procedures of APHA and Difco manuals using plate count agar (PCA) and MSA (Mannitol Salt Agar). The analyses procedures were replicated three times and the mean data obtained was subjected to the Duncan Multiple Range Test statistical analyses. The bacteria species isolated and identified in the course of the experiment include coliform bacteria, E. coli and Enterobacter spp., Staphyloccocus aureus and Staphyloccocus spp. Results of the study indicated a gradual buildup of microbial populations in the samples from day 0 of the experiment. The results also indicated that microbial count increases as storage period increases reaching its peak at day 20 in all sausage samples. All the oil based samples i.e. T2 – T5 had lower bacterial counts compared to the control sausage without oil (T1).Significant differences (P <0.05) exists in the total plate count among all the treatment from day 0 to day 20.The results shows that olive oil based sausage (T3) and groundnut based sausage (T5) had lower microbial counts of 2.60 x 104 and 2.30 x 104 respectively at day 20 compared with those of No oil (T1), Lard (T2) and Shea butter (T4) based sausages with microbial counts of 8.20 x 104, 3.80 x 104, and 5.40 x 104 respectively. Both Olive oil and Ground nut oil effectively inhibit microbial growth on MSA in comparison with other oils as there was no microbial growth recorded on both oils from day 0 to day 20. In the present circumstance, it seems Olive oil and groundnut oil are better oils for sausage manufacturing as they seem to possess better antioxidant and antimicrobial qualities.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Microbial, stored, Beef, Sausages, Comparative.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
    download downloads 4
  • 2
    views
    4
    downloads
    Data sourceViewsDownloads
    ZENODO24
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
4
Green
Related to Research communities