Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Virologic...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Virological Methods
Article . 1991 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A comparison of different genomic probes in the detection of virus-specified RNA in Orbivirus-infected cells

Authors: G.J. Viljoen; A.A. van Dijk; Estelle Hildegard Venter; H. Huismans; Louis Hendrik Nel;

A comparison of different genomic probes in the detection of virus-specified RNA in Orbivirus-infected cells

Abstract

Different 32P-labelled genomic probes of bluetongue virus (BTV), epizootic haemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) and equine encephalosis virus (EEV) were compared with respect to the detection of virus-specified RNA in infected cells. The probe derived from the genome segment that encodes nonstructural protein NS1 was found to be the most sensitive, detecting virus-specified RNA in glutaraldehyde-fixed cells as early as 2-3 h p.i. This comparison was based on the observation that the NS1 gene probe required a smaller number of infected cells to produce a positive hybridization signal than the other nucleic acid probes. The only exception was the EHDV NS2 gene probe which appeared to be as sensitive as the NS1 gene probe. The advantage of using the NS1 gene probe was particularly evident in the analysis of cells infected at very low multiplicities of infection. At a multiplicity of infection of 1 x 10(-5) plaque forming units/cell, virus-specified RNA could be detected 48 h after infection. The greater sensitivity of the NS1 gene-specific probe is ascribed to the fact that its target, the NS1 mRNA, is transcribed more frequently than the other target viral mRNAs. The major application of the cell-hybridization method is the rapid detection of small quantities of infectious virus particles.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Encephalitis Viruses, Orthohantavirus, Genes, Viral, Molecular Probes, Animals, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, RNA, Viral, Virus Replication, Bluetongue virus, Cell Line

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities