Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Effects of a Coal Mine Effluent on Aquatic Hyphomycetes. II. Laboratory Toxicity Experiments

Authors: Lorraine Maltby; S. Bermingham; R.C. Cooke;

Effects of a Coal Mine Effluent on Aquatic Hyphomycetes. II. Laboratory Toxicity Experiments

Abstract

The effects of iron and manganese on the growth and reproduction of three aquatic hyphomycetes, Alatospora acuminata, Tetrachaetum elegans and Articulospora tetracladia, were assessed in the laboratory. Previous studies had indicated that T. elegans and A. acuminata appeared not to colonize leaf material below a discharge from an abandoned coal mine, whereas the distribution of A. tetracladia was not affected by this effluent. The principal contaminants of this effluent were iron and manganese. Neither iron nor manganese had inhibitory effects on the growth of the three species investigated. Indeed, mycelial extension rates of A. tetracladia were stimulated by the presence of iron. Reproduction was however, affected, with the sporulation of both T. elegans and A. acuminata being significantly reduced by exposure to either iron or manganese. By contrast, no significant effect on sporulation of A. tetracladia was observed. There was no significant effect of either metal on conidial germination of the three species. The apparent field distribution of fungi was related to their sensitivities to metals in the laboratory. Those species which appeared to be excluded by the discharge produced few or no conidia when exposed to metals at concentrations equivalent to those recorded at the contaminated site. Since conidia were used to detect aquatic hyphomycetes, it is unclear whether A. acuminata and T. elegans were indeed absent below the discharge or were present as mycelium which, being unable to sporulate, cannot be identified.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Average
Top 10%
Average