
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
GHG emissions and other environmental impacts of indirect land use change mitigation

GHG emissions and other environmental impacts of indirect land use change mitigation
AbstractThe implementation of measures to increase productivity and resource efficiency in food and bioenergy chains as well as to more sustainably manage land use can significantly increase the biofuel production potential while limiting the risk of causing indirect land use change (ILUC). However, the application of these measures may influence the greenhouse gas (GHG) balance and other environmental impacts of agricultural and biofuel production. This study applies a novel, integrated approach to assess the environmental impacts of agricultural and biofuel production for three ILUC mitigation scenarios, representing a low, medium and high miscanthus‐based ethanol production potential, and for three agricultural intensification pathways in terms of sustainability in Lublin province in 2020. Generally, the ILUC mitigation scenarios attain lower net annual emissions compared to a baseline scenario that excludes ILUC mitigation and bioethanol production. However, the reduction potential significantly depends on the intensification pathway considered. For example, in the moderate ILUC mitigation scenario, the net annual GHG emissions in the case study are 2.3 MtCO2‐eq yr−1 (1.8 tCO2‐eq ha−1 yr−1) for conventional intensification and −0.8 MtCO2‐eq yr−1 (−0.6 tCO2‐eq ha−1 yr−1) for sustainable intensification, compared to 3.0 MtCO2‐eq yr−1 (2.3 tCO2‐eq ha−1 yr−1) in the baseline scenario. In addition, the intensification pathway is found to be more influential for the GHG balance than the ILUC mitigation scenario, indicating the importance of how agricultural intensification is implemented in practice. Furthermore, when the net emissions are included in the assessment of GHG emissions from bioenergy, the ILUC mitigation scenarios often abate GHG emissions compared to gasoline. But sustainable intensification is required to attain GHG abatement potentials of 90% or higher. A qualitative assessment of the impacts on biodiversity, water quantity and quality, soil quality and air quality also emphasizes the importance of sustainable intensification.
- Utrecht University Netherlands
- University Museum Utrecht Netherlands
- University of Groningen Netherlands
indirect land use change mitigation and prevention, MISCANTHUS, POTENTIALS, BIOFUELS, GREENHOUSE-GAS MITIGATION, bioenergy, valorisation, UKRAINE, ENERGY CROP, Bioenergy, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, Renewable Energy, Waste Management and Disposal, BIOENERGY PRODUCTION, SDG 15 - Life on Land, agriculture, Sustainability and the Environment, environmental impact assessment, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Agricultural intensification, Environmental impact assessment, SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth, Agriculture, Forestry, BIOMASS PRODUCTION, CULTIVATION, GHG emissions, To be checked by Faculty, Indirect land use change mitigation and prevention, agricultural intensification, SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production, Agronomy and Crop Science, AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION
indirect land use change mitigation and prevention, MISCANTHUS, POTENTIALS, BIOFUELS, GREENHOUSE-GAS MITIGATION, bioenergy, valorisation, UKRAINE, ENERGY CROP, Bioenergy, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, Renewable Energy, Waste Management and Disposal, BIOENERGY PRODUCTION, SDG 15 - Life on Land, agriculture, Sustainability and the Environment, environmental impact assessment, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Agricultural intensification, Environmental impact assessment, SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth, Agriculture, Forestry, BIOMASS PRODUCTION, CULTIVATION, GHG emissions, To be checked by Faculty, Indirect land use change mitigation and prevention, agricultural intensification, SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production, Agronomy and Crop Science, AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION
5 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2015IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).27 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
