
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Moderate Grazer Density Stabilizes Forage Availability More Than Patch Burning in Low-Stature Grassland

doi: 10.3390/land10040395
Moderate Grazer Density Stabilizes Forage Availability More Than Patch Burning in Low-Stature Grassland
Spatially patchy fire creates landscape-level diversity that in turn stabilizes several rangeland ecosystem services, including forage production and habitat availability. To enhance biodiversity and livestock production, efforts are underway to restore fire regimes in rangelands throughout the Great Plains. However, invasive species such as tall fescue Schedonorus arundinaceus syn. Festuca arundinacea, initially introduced for forage production, hamper prescribed fire use. Grazer density, or stocking rate, modulates the effect of patchy fire regimes on ecological patterns in invaded, semi-natural rangeland pastures. We compare three diversity–stability responses—temporal variability in aboveground plant biomass, portfolio effects among plant functional groups, and beta diversity in plant functional group composition—in pastures managed with two different fire regimes through three periods of heavy, light, and moderate stocking rate in southern Iowa, USA. Pastures were either burned in patches, with one-third of the pasture burned each year, or completely burned every third year. The period of moderate grazer density had the least temporal variability in aboveground plant biomass, regardless of fire regime. We also found statistical evidence for a portfolio effect under moderate stocking, where diversification of plant communities through varying cover of functional groups can stabilize communities by reducing year-to-year variability. Beta diversity among plant functional groups was greatest during the moderate grazer density period as well. The short stature of tall fescue prevented the patch-burning regime to create contrast in vegetation structure among patches, and there was no difference in any diversity–stability mechanism response across the two different patterns of burning. Although longitudinal, these data suggest that temporal variability in aboveground plant biomass declines with diversity–stability mechanisms that underlie ecosystem function. Our results also support a decades-old principle of range management: moderate grazing intensity enhances diversity and stability, which has been shown to buffer forage shortfalls during drought.
- North Dakota State University United States
- Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City United States
- United States Department of the Interior United States
- Montana State University United States
- North Dakota State University United States
580, 570, S, temporal variability, Natural Resources Management and Policy, Agriculture, diversity–stability, fire–grazing interaction, fire–grazing interaction, 630, diversity–stability, Natural Resources and Conservation, great plains, Other Environmental Sciences, Environmental Sciences
580, 570, S, temporal variability, Natural Resources Management and Policy, Agriculture, diversity–stability, fire–grazing interaction, fire–grazing interaction, 630, diversity–stability, Natural Resources and Conservation, great plains, Other Environmental Sciences, Environmental Sciences
11 Research products, page 1 of 2
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2012IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2011IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2001IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).5 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
