
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The “Pause” in Global Warming: Turning a Routine Fluctuation into a Problem for Science

The “Pause” in Global Warming: Turning a Routine Fluctuation into a Problem for Science
Abstract There has been much recent published research about a putative “pause” or “hiatus” in global warming. We show that there are frequent fluctuations in the rate of warming around a longer-term warming trend, and that there is no evidence that identifies the recent period as unique or particularly unusual. In confirmation, we show that the notion of a pause in warming is considered to be misleading in a blind expert test. Nonetheless, the most recent fluctuation about the longer-term trend has been regarded by many as an explanatory challenge that climate science must resolve. This departs from long-standing practice, insofar as scientists have long recognized that the climate fluctuates, that linear increases in CO2 do not produce linear trends in global warming, and that 15-yr (or shorter) periods are not diagnostic of long-term trends. We suggest that the repetition of the “warming has paused” message by contrarians was adopted by the scientific community in its problem-solving and answer-seeking role and has led to undue focus on, and mislabeling of, a recent fluctuation. We present an alternative framing that could have avoided inadvertently reinforcing a misleading claim.
- University of Bristol United Kingdom
- Harvard University United States
- University of Western Australia Australia
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog, name=Memory, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/psyc_memory; name=Memory, TeDCog, Memory, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog; name=TeDCog, name=TeDCog, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/psyc_memory
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog, name=Memory, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/psyc_memory; name=Memory, TeDCog, Memory, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog; name=TeDCog, name=TeDCog, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/psyc_memory
23 Research products, page 1 of 3
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
chevron_left - 1
- 2
- 3
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).82 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
