• Energy Research
• 2025-2025close
• FI close
• AU close
• ES close
• DE close

In the quest for effective solutions to address Environ. Pollut. and meet the escalating energy demands, heterojunction photocatalysts have emerged as a captivating and versatile technology. These photocatalysts have garnered significant interest due to their wide-ranging applications, including wastewater treatment, air purification, CO2 capture, and hydrogen generation via water splitting. This technique harnesses the power of semiconductors, which are activated under light illumination, providing the necessary energy for catalytic reactions. With visible light constituting a substantial portion (46%) of the solar spectrum, the development of visible-light-driven semiconductors has become imperative. Heterojunction photocatalysts offer a promising strategy to overcome the limitations associated with activating semiconductors under visible light. In this comprehensive review, we present the recent advancements in the field of photocatalytic degradation of contaminants across diverse media, as well as the remarkable progress made in renewable energy production. Moreover, we delve into the crucial role played by various operating parameters in influencing the photocatalytic performance of heterojunction systems. Finally, we address emerging challenges and propose novel perspectives to provide valuable insights for future advancements in this dynamic research domain. By unraveling the potential of heterojunction photocatalysts, this review contributes to the broader understanding of their applications and paves the way for exciting avenues of exploration and innovation.

| openaire: EC/H2020/963646/EU//HELIOS Lithium titanate oxide (LTO) batteries have been under intensive research due to their stability, safety, and rapid charging characteristics. Nevertheless, uncertainties as to LTO-batteries behavior when used as a raw material in battery recycling still exist. This study provides a grave-to-gate life cycle inventory for a hydrometallurgical battery recycling process in which Li-battery waste materials nickel manganese cobalt (NMC), LTO, and graphite were used as feed. The simulation showed that NMC cathode materials and lithium from both battery waste fractions could be recovered. In contrast, the titanium present within LTO cannot be recovered by the recycling process. Nevertheless, the life cycle assessment (LCA) of the process demonstrated clear benefits of recycling battery materials, highlighted by the decrease in global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication, and ozone depletion potential. Additionally, two routes for hazardous waste management were simulated to ascertain the environmental impacts of hazardous waste management within the recycling process. Peer reviewed

The required data was provided by Energex. The study received partial funding from the Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain (Project ID: PID2020-115454GB-C21). Partial support of this work was through the LATENTIA project PID2022-140786NB-C31 of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MICINNU) . This work presents a Temporal Convolution Network (TCN) model for half-hourly, three-hourly and daily-time step to predict electricity demand ( ) with associated uncertainties for sites in Southeast Queensland Australia. In addition to multi-step predictions, the TCN model is applied for probabilistic predictions of where the aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties are quantified using maximum likelihood and Monte Carlo Dropout methodologies. The benchmarks of TCN model include an attention-based, bi-directional, gated recurrent unit, seq2seq, encoder–decoder, recurrent neural networks and natural gradient boosting models. The testing results show that the proposed TCN model attains the lowest relative root mean square error of 5.336-7.547% compared with significantly larger errors for all benchmark models. In respect to the 95% confidence interval using the Diebold–Mariano test statistic and key performance metrics, the proposed TCN model is better than benchmark models, capturing a lower value of total uncertainty, as well as the aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. The root mean square error and total uncertainty registered for all of the forecast horizons shows that the benchmark models registered relatively larger errors arising from the epistemic uncertainty in predicted electricity demand. The results obtained for TCN, measured by the quality of prediction intervals representing an interval with upper and lower bound errors, registered a greater reliability factor as this model was likely to produce prediction interval that were higher than benchmark models at all prediction intervals. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of TCN approach in electricity demand modelling, and therefore advocates its usefulness in now-casting and forecasting systems.

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have found wide applications in a variety of fields such as electrified transportation, stationary storage and portable electronics devices. A battery management system (BMS) is critical to ensure the reliability, efficiency and longevity of LIBs. Recent research has witnessed the emergence of model-based fault diagnosis methods in advanced BMSs. This paper provides a comprehensive review on the model-based fault diagnosis methods for LIBs. First, the widely explored battery models in the existing literature are classified into physics-based electrochemical models and electrical equivalent circuit models. Second, a general state-space representation that describes electrical dynamics of a faulty battery is presented. The formulation of the state vectors and the identification of the parameter matrices are then elaborated. Third, the fault mechanisms of both battery faults (incl. overcharege/overdischarge faults, connection faults, short circuit faults) and sensor faults (incl. voltage sensor faults and current sensor faults) are discussed. Furthermore, different types of modeling uncertainties, such as modeling errors and measurement noises, aging effects, measurement outliers, are elaborated. An emphasis is then placed on the observer design (incl. online state observers and offline state observers). The algorithm implementation of typical state observers for battery fault diagnosis is also put forward. Finally, discussion and outlook are offered to envision some possible future research directions. Comment: Submitted to Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews on 09-Jan-2024

A new energy-consistent discretization of the viscous dissipation function in incompressible flows is proposed. It is implied by choosing a discretization of the diffusive terms and a discretization of the local kinetic energy equation and by requiring that continuous identities like the product rule are mimicked discretely. The proposed viscous dissipation function has a quadratic, strictly dissipative form, for both simplified (constant viscosity) stress tensors and general stress tensors. The proposed expression is not only useful in evaluating energy budgets in turbulent flows, but also in natural convection flows, where it appears in the internal energy equation and is responsible for viscous heating. The viscous dissipation function is such that a consistent total energy balance is obtained: the 'implied' presence as sink in the kinetic energy equation is exactly balanced by explicitly adding it as source term in the internal energy equation. Numerical experiments of Rayleigh-Bénard convection (RBC) and Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities confirm that with the proposed dissipation function, the energy exchange between kinetic and internal energy is exactly preserved. The experiments show furthermore that viscous dissipation does not affect the critical Rayleigh number at which instabilities form, but it does significantly impact the development of instabilities once they occur. Consequently, the value of the Nusselt number on the cold plate becomes larger than on the hot plate, with the difference increasing with increasing Gebhart number. Finally, 3D simulations of turbulent RBC show that energy balances are exactly satisfied even for very coarse grids; therefore, we consider that the proposed discretization forms an excellent starting point for testing sub-grid scale models.

# databases used for statistical analyses in manuscript WLB-2024-01345 [https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tht76hf7v](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tht76hf7v) ## Description of the data and file structure **List of excel files used for GLMMs and other analyses in manuscript WLB-2024-01345.R1 – “Precipitation and female experience are major determinants of the breeding performance of Canarian houbara bustards”** ### Files and variables #### File: GLM2b2NestInitiatDate.xlsx **Description:** ** database for GLMM Nest Initiation Date (NIDF, see Supplementary Table S3)** ##### Variables * definitions as in other excel files #### File: GLM4aNestAttemptSuccess.xlsx **Description:** **database for GLMM Nest Attempt Success (see Supplementary Table S3)** ##### Variables * clutchOrder: order of the clutch (1 first, 2 second –replacement-, 3 third –replacement-clutch), chicksSurvived: chicks survived until productivity control (1= yes/0= no, see Methods), MeanTemp: during 23 days incubation + 2 months in nestings that have chicks on the control date, AvMaxTemp: average maximum temperature during 23 days incubation + 2 months in nestings that have chicks on the control date, AvMinTemp: average minimum temperature during 23 days incubation + 2 months in nestings that have chicks on the control date, pp: precipitation during 23 days incubation + 2 months in nestings that have chicks on the control date, other variables as defined in other excel files #### File: GLM4bFledSuccess.xlsx **Description:** **database for GLMM Fledging Success (see Supplementary Table S3)** ##### Variables * Variables:** **pp: precipitation during** **23 days since nesting start + 2 months in nestings that have chicks on the control date; 23+1 month, in nestings that do not have chicks on the control date, other variables as defined in other excel files #### File: GLM5ReClutchProb.xlsx **Description:** **database for GLMM Re-clutching Probability (see Supplementary Table S3)** ##### Variables * Variables: Reclutch: 1= has a replacement clutch/0= does not have a replacement clutch, DurationIncubation: duration of the incubation period (days), MeanTemp, AvMaxTemp, AvMinTemp, pp: measured over the incubation period, other variables as defined in other excel files #### File: Weighted\_precipitations.xlsx **Description:** **databases to calculate weighted precipitation amounts, periods of precipitation and nestings (see Methods for details)** ##### Variables * definitions as in other excel files #### File: GLM6a3FemaleProductivity.xlsx **Description:** **database for GLMM Productivity (see Supplementary Table S3)** ##### Variables * nClutches: number of clutches (1,2,3), NchicksSurvived (1,2 up to fledging), pp2: precipitation measured from one month before the first laying to the laying date of the last clutch, other variables as defined in other excel files #### File: GLM6bFemaleProductivity.xlsx **Description:** **database for GLMM Productivity (as GLM6a, but measuring precipitation over the same period for all years: from 1 September to 13 March [mean hatching start date of the latest year, which was 2022]; see Supplementary Table S3)** ##### Variables * as in GLM6a3FemaleProductivity.xlsx, but measuring precipitation over the same period for all years: from 1 September to 13 March [mean hatching start date of the latest year, which was 2022; other variables as defined in other excel files #### File: GLM7aLengthBreedSeason.xlsx **Description:** **database for GLMM Length of the Breeding Season (see Supplementary Table S3)** ##### Variables * daysBreeding: duration of the breeding season in days (see definition in Methods), temperature and precipitation (PP) measured from 1 month before the first day of incubation of that year in any female until the date of independence of the last chick (see Azar et al 2018: Total rainfall during the nesting period (the period between the first and last nest found each year). other variables as defined in other excel files #### File: GLM7bLengthBreedSeason.xlsx **Description:** **database for GLMM Length of the Breeding Season, same as GLM7aLengthBreedSeason.xlsx, but precipitation and temperature measured over an equal period for all years: from 1 September to 13 March (= average hatching starting date of the latest year, 2022) (see Supplementary Table S3)** ##### Variables * as in GLM7aLengthBreedSeason.xlsx, but precipitation and temperature measured over an equal period for all years: from 1 September to 13 March #### File: WeightedPrecipitationPeriods.xlsx **Description:** **database to calculate weighted precipitation periods and nestings (see Methods for details)** ##### Variables * as in other excel files #### File: GLM2cNestInitiatDate.xlsx **Description:** **database for GLMM Nest Initiation Date of First Clutches (NIDF2, see Supplementary Table S3)** ##### Variables * definitions as in other excel files #### File: GLM1bNestingRate.xlsx **Description:** **database for GLMM Nesting Rate (see Supplementary Table S3)** ##### Variables * indiv= individual female, year, femaleNests: 1=Yes/0=No, startNest = date when nesting started, pp30days: precipitation on the 30 days before (in mm), pp60ays: precipitation on the 60 days before (in mm), pp90days: precipitation on the 90 days before (in mm), TempMean30days: mean temperature on the 30 days before (in oC), TempMax30days: maximum temperature on the 30 days before (in oC), TempMin30days: minimum temperature on the 30 days before (in oC), TempMean60days: mean temperature on the 60 days before (in oC), TempMax60days: maximum temperature on the 60 days before (in oC), TempMean60days: mean temperature on the 60 days before (in oC), Weight: weight of the female (g), PC1p: Principal Component 1 of the PCA including weight, PC1sinP: Principal Component 1 of the PCA excluding weight, Breedingexperience: breeding experience of the female, as defined in Methods. #### File: GLM1cNestingRate2.xlsx **Description:** ##### Variables * indiv= individual female, year, femaleNests: 1=Yes/0=No, startNest = date when nesting started, pp30days: precipitation on the 30 days before (in mm), pp60ays: precipitation on the 60 days before (in mm), pp90days: precipitation on the 90 days before (in mm), TempMean30days: mean temperature on the 30 days before (in oC), TempMax30days: maximum temperature on the 30 days before (in oC), TempMin30days: minimum temperature on the 30 days before (in oC), TempMean60days: mean temperature on the 60 days before (in oC), TempMax60days: maximum temperature on the 60 days before (in oC), TempMean60days: mean temperature on the 60 days before (in oC), Weight: weight of the female (g), PC1p: Principal Component 1 of the PCA including weight, PC1sinP: Principal Component 1 of the PCA excluding weight, Breedingexperience: breeding experience of the female, as defined in Methods, pp_1sep_13mar: precipitation measured between 1st September and 13th March, T_1sep_13mar: temperature measured between 1st September and 13th March #### File: GLM2a2NestInitiatDate.xlsx **Description:** **database for GLMM Nest Initiation Date (NIDF, see Supplementary Table S3)** ##### Variables * ordinalDate: Ordinal date as defined in Methods, rest of variables: definitions as in other excel files #### File: GLM3HatchSuccess.xlsx **Description:** **database for GLMM Hatching Success (see Supplementary Table S3)** ##### Variables * : endNest: date when incubation finished, ppIncub: precipitation during incubation (23 days since start incubation), AvMaxTempIncub: average maximum temperature during incubation, AvMaxTempIncub: average maximum temperature during incubation, ppIncub: mean temperature during incubation, hatchSuccess: 1= incubation until hatching date is successful/ 0= incubation until hatching date is not successful, rest of variables: definitions as in other excel files ## Code/software data can be viewed using EXCEL; other files from the process of statistical analysis were obtained using package “lme4” (Bates et al. 2015) in R v.2.15.1 (R Development Core Team, 2015) Precipitation is one of the main triggers of reproduction in desert-breeding birds. The unpredictability of rainfall patterns in arid environments has led species to adapt their breeding effort to episodes of abundant food after rainfall. The response is not the same for all individuals in a population, and may vary especially with the age and experience of each female. Here we investigate the effects of precipitation, temperature, body size and breeding experience, among other variables, on reproductive parameters of 20 females of Canarian houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata fuertaventurae), an endangered desert bird endemic of the eastern Canary Islands. Precipitation and breeding experience were the main determinants of female breeding performance. Higher rainfall determined an increase in nesting rate, and earlier autumn rains caused an advancement of nesting to October, allowing the breeding season to be extended to eight months. This favoured an extraordinary increase in productivity in more rainy breeding seasons, with 15 times more females nesting in the two most rainy winters than in dry years. In addition, females with more breeding experience showed a higher tendency to breed, higher nest attempt and fledging success, and longer breeding season, which allowed them to rear more chicks. A female even double brooded successfully in the same season, which, considering that chicks remain with the mother for up to six months, indicates a great capacity to optimise reproductive investment, by adapting to highly variable rainfall regimes. In recent decades, the eastern Canary Islands have undergone a process of aridification, and climate models predict a medium-term increase in the frequency and duration of drought periods. Thus, Canarian houbaras are particularly vulnerable to climate change, so measures are urgently needed to reduce their mortality and improve the quality of their habitat, in order to favour their reproduction and prevent their extinction.  We used 5-year breeding phenology and breeding success data from 20 female houbara bustards captured in Lanzarote and equipped with backpack-mounted GSM/GPRS data loggers. The influence of predictor variables on breeding parameters was modeled by means of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) using package “lme4” (Bates et al. 2015) in R v.2.15.1 (R Development Core Team, 2015).