- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2019 France, France, United States, France, Germany, Australia, United Kingdom, Spain, France, Spain, France, France, AustraliaPublisher:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Funded by:EC | MERCES, NSERC, EC | BIGSEA +1 projectsEC| MERCES ,NSERC ,EC| BIGSEA ,EC| CERESDavid A. Carozza; Steve Mackinson; Jeroen Steenbeek; Villy Christensen; Philippe Verley; Susa Niiranen; Andrea Bryndum-Buchholz; Matthias Büchner; Derek P. Tittensor; Derek P. Tittensor; Jan Volkholz; John P. Dunne; Elizabeth A. Fulton; Julia L. Blanchard; Ricardo Oliveros-Ramos; Jacob Schewe; Simon Jennings; Simon Jennings; Manuel Barange; Charles A. Stock; Boris Worm; Miranda C. Jones; Nicola D. Walker; Laurent Bopp; Olivier Maury; Olivier Maury; William W. L. Cheung; Tiago H. Silva; Daniele Bianchi; Heike K. Lotze; Tilla Roy; Catherine M. Bulman; Tyler D. Eddy; Tyler D. Eddy; Nicolas Barrier; Marta Coll; Eric D. Galbraith; Eric D. Galbraith; Jose A. Fernandes; Yunne-Jai Shin; Yunne-Jai Shin;While the physical dimensions of climate change are now routinely assessed through multimodel intercomparisons, projected impacts on the global ocean ecosystem generally rely on individual models with a specific set of assumptions. To address these single-model limitations, we present standardized ensemble projections from six global marine ecosystem models forced with two Earth system models and four emission scenarios with and without fishing. We derive average biomass trends and associated uncertainties across the marine food web. Without fishing, mean global animal biomass decreased by 5% (±4% SD) under low emissions and 17% (±11% SD) under high emissions by 2100, with an average 5% decline for every 1 °C of warming. Projected biomass declines were primarily driven by increasing temperature and decreasing primary production, and were more pronounced at higher trophic levels, a process known as trophic amplification. Fishing did not substantially alter the effects of climate change. Considerable regional variation featured strong biomass increases at high latitudes and decreases at middle to low latitudes, with good model agreement on the direction of change but variable magnitude. Uncertainties due to variations in marine ecosystem and Earth system models were similar. Ensemble projections performed well compared with empirical data, emphasizing the benefits of multimodel inference to project future outcomes. Our results indicate that global ocean animal biomass consistently declines with climate change, and that these impacts are amplified at higher trophic levels. Next steps for model development include dynamic scenarios of fishing, cumulative human impacts, and the effects of management measures on future ocean biomass trends.
University of East A... arrow_drop_down University of East Anglia digital repositoryArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: University of East Anglia digital repositoryUniversity of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0tf378n8Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2019License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-02272161Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Bretagne Occidentale: HALArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-02272161Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: CrossrefRecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2019Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTADiposit Digital de Documents de la UABArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Diposit Digital de Documents de la UABeScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2019Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerOther literature type . 2019Data sources: ArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert University of East A... arrow_drop_down University of East Anglia digital repositoryArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: University of East Anglia digital repositoryUniversity of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0tf378n8Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2019License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-02272161Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Bretagne Occidentale: HALArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-02272161Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: CrossrefRecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2019Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTADiposit Digital de Documents de la UABArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Diposit Digital de Documents de la UABeScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2019Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerOther literature type . 2019Data sources: ArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2009 United KingdomPublisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Funded by:NSF | Intestinal Bicarbonate Se..., NSF | Intestinal Bicarbonate Se..., UKRI | Novel driving forces for ... +2 projectsNSF| Intestinal Bicarbonate Secretion in Marine Teleost Fish ,NSF| Intestinal Bicarbonate Secretion, Osmoregulation and Acid-Base Balance in Marine Fish ,UKRI| Novel driving forces for water transport & osmoregulation: carbonate precipitation and osmotic coefficients ,NSERC ,NSF| SGER: Development of Equipement and Methodology for Simultaneous Measurements of Epithelial Transport and Oxygen ConsumptionJosi R. Taylor; Frank J. Millero; Villy Christensen; Patrick J. Walsh; Patrick J. Walsh; Simon Jennings; Martin Grosell; Rod W. Wilson;pmid: 19150840
Oceanic production of calcium carbonate is conventionally attributed to marine plankton (coccolithophores and foraminifera). Here we report that marine fish produce precipitated carbonates within their intestines and excrete these at high rates. When combined with estimates of global fish biomass, this suggests that marine fish contribute 3 to 15% of total oceanic carbonate production. Fish carbonates have a higher magnesium content and solubility than traditional sources, yielding faster dissolution with depth. This may explain up to a quarter of the increase in titratable alkalinity within 1000 meters of the ocean surface, a controversial phenomenon that has puzzled oceanographers for decades. We also predict that fish carbonate production may rise in response to future environmental changes in carbon dioxide, and thus become an increasingly important component of the inorganic carbon cycle.
Science arrow_drop_down University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2009Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert Science arrow_drop_down University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2009Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Conference object , Other literature type , Journal 2018 United Kingdom, France, France, France, France, France, Spain, United Kingdom, Canada, France, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, Germany, SpainPublisher:Copernicus GmbH Funded by:EC | BIOWEB, NSERC, ARC | Discovery Projects - Gran... +2 projectsEC| BIOWEB ,NSERC ,ARC| Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP140101377 ,EC| BIGSEA ,EC| CERESD. P. Tittensor; D. P. Tittensor; T. D. Eddy; T. D. Eddy; H. K. Lotze; E. D. Galbraith; E. D. Galbraith; W. Cheung; M. Barange; M. Barange; J. L. Blanchard; L. Bopp; A. Bryndum-Buchholz; M. Büchner; C. Bulman; D. A. Carozza; V. Christensen; M. Coll; M. Coll; M. Coll; J. P. Dunne; J. A. Fernandes; J. A. Fernandes; E. A. Fulton; E. A. Fulton; A. J. Hobday; A. J. Hobday; V. Huber; S. Jennings; S. Jennings; S. Jennings; M. Jones; P. Lehodey; J. S. Link; S. Mackinson; O. Maury; O. Maury; S. Niiranen; R. Oliveros-Ramos; T. Roy; T. Roy; J. Schewe; Y.-J. Shin; Y.-J. Shin; T. Silva; C. A. Stock; J. Steenbeek; P. J. Underwood; J. Volkholz; J. R. Watson; N. D. Walker;handle: 10261/165167
Abstract. Model intercomparison studies in the climate and Earth sciences communities have been crucial to building credibility and coherence for future projections. They have quantified variability among models, spurred model development, contrasted within- and among-model uncertainty, assessed model fits to historical data, and provided ensemble projections of future change under specified scenarios. Given the speed and magnitude of anthropogenic change in the marine environment and the consequent effects on food security, biodiversity, marine industries, and society, the time is ripe for similar comparisons among models of fisheries and marine ecosystems. Here, we describe the Fisheries and Marine Ecosystem Model Intercomparison Project protocol version 1.0 (Fish-MIP v1.0), part of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP), which is a cross-sectoral network of climate impact modellers. Given the complexity of the marine ecosystem, this class of models has substantial heterogeneity of purpose, scope, theoretical underpinning, processes considered, parameterizations, resolution (grain size), and spatial extent. This heterogeneity reflects the lack of a unified understanding of the marine ecosystem and implies that the assemblage of all models is more likely to include a greater number of relevant processes than any single model. The current Fish-MIP protocol is designed to allow these heterogeneous models to be forced with common Earth System Model (ESM) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) outputs under prescribed scenarios for historic (from the 1950s) and future (to 2100) time periods; it will be adapted to CMIP phase 6 (CMIP6) in future iterations. It also describes a standardized set of outputs for each participating Fish-MIP model to produce. This enables the broad characterization of differences between and uncertainties within models and projections when assessing climate and fisheries impacts on marine ecosystems and the services they provide. The systematic generation, collation, and comparison of results from Fish-MIP will inform an understanding of the range of plausible changes in marine ecosystems and improve our capacity to define and convey the strengths and weaknesses of model-based advice on future states of marine ecosystems and fisheries. Ultimately, Fish-MIP represents a step towards bringing together the marine ecosystem modelling community to produce consistent ensemble medium- and long-term projections of marine ecosystems.
Plymouth Marine Scie... arrow_drop_down Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMEA)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: CORE (RIOXX-UK Aggregator)University of East Anglia digital repositoryArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: University of East Anglia digital repositoryUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806877Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Memorial University of Newfoundland: Research RepositoryArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806877Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTADiposit Digital de Documents de la UABArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Diposit Digital de Documents de la UABArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerOther literature type . 2018Data sources: ArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerGeoscientific Model DevelopmentArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portaladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert Plymouth Marine Scie... arrow_drop_down Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMEA)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: CORE (RIOXX-UK Aggregator)University of East Anglia digital repositoryArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: University of East Anglia digital repositoryUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806877Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Memorial University of Newfoundland: Research RepositoryArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806877Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTADiposit Digital de Documents de la UABArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Diposit Digital de Documents de la UABArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerOther literature type . 2018Data sources: ArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerGeoscientific Model DevelopmentArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portaladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021Publisher:Elsevier BV Authors: José Juan Castro Hernández; Villy Christensen; Lorena Couce Montero;pmid: 33984556
The ecological system conformed by the islands of Tenerife and La Gomera (Canary Islands) is characterized though the trophic network. The indicators obtained by the Ecopath model show a stressed and still developing ecosystem, probably related to inadequate management of the fisheries that takes place in this area, focused on high trophic level species. The Ecosim and Ecospace modules have been used to provide comparative assessment of three management scenarios addressed to evaluate the impact of fishing, both professional and recreational, on the marine ecosystem, as well as the spatial evolution of the fishing effort in a projection period going from 2021 to 2030, that can be applied in decision-making and planning in the short and medium term. In all the simulated scenarios, a drastic reduction in the biomass of pelagic species was observed, including the trophic guild of pelagic sharks that the model identifies as key species for the correct functioning of this marine ecosystem. Despite the existing information gaps, the results seem to confirm that the intense exploitation to which some functional groups have been subjected in the past has left its mark on the ecosystem, requiring a significant fishing effort reduction to attempt a recovery of the stocks. It is strongly recommended the implementation of a recreational fishing data collection system with less uncertainty, due to its significant role in the state of this ecological system.
Recolector de Cienci... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2021Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAMarine Environmental ResearchArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert Recolector de Cienci... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2021Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAMarine Environmental ResearchArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2020Publisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Edward J. Gregr; Villy Christensen; Linda Nichol; Rebecca G. Martone; Russell W. Markel; Jane C. Watson; Christopher D. G. Harley; Evgeny A. Pakhomov; Jonathan B. Shurin; Kai M. A. Chan;pmid: 32527830
The benefits of ecosystem restorationHuman activities have fundamentally altered many ecosystems. Recent successful restoration efforts have led to healthier ecosystems, but this has led to a disruption in economies dependent on the altered state of the system. One of the best-known trophic cascades is the sea otter–kelp forest system, wherein recovery of once extirpated sea otters is bringing back biodiverse and healthy kelp forests but reducing the abundance of harvested shellfish. Gregret al.looked at the costs and benefits of this shift and found that for key trade-offs, the value of kelp forest–associated features such as tourism, fin fish fisheries, and carbon capture outweighed the losses to economies (see the Perspective by Estes and Carswell). Thus, ecosystem recovery can benefit both ecosystems and economies.Science, this issue p.1243; see also p.1178
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2010 AustraliaPublisher:Wiley Elizabeth A. Fulton; S.J. Metcalf; Richard J. Matear; Robyn E. Forrest; Anthony J. Richardson; Anthony J. Richardson; Villy Christensen; Neil Gribble; Reg Watson; C Bulman; Christopher J. Brown; Christopher J. Brown; Hugh P. Possingham; Alistair J. Hobday; Hector Lozano-Montes; Shane P. Griffiths; Thomas A. Okey; Peter C. Gehrke; José M. Martín;AbstractClimate change is altering the rate and distribution of primary production in the world's oceans. Primary production is critical to maintaining biodiversity and supporting fishery catches, but predicting the response of populations to primary production change is complicated by predation and competition interactions. We simulated the effects of change in primary production on diverse marine ecosystems across a wide latitudinal range in Australia using the marine food web model Ecosim. We link models of primary production of lower trophic levels (phytoplankton and benthic producers) under climate change with Ecosim to predict changes in fishery catch, fishery value, biomass of animals of conservation interest, and indicators of community composition. Under a plausible climate change scenario, primary production will increase around Australia and generally this benefits fisheries catch and value and leads to increased biomass of threatened marine animals such as turtles and sharks. However, community composition is not strongly affected. Sensitivity analyses indicate overall positive linear responses of functional groups to primary production change. Responses are robust to the ecosystem type and the complexity of the model used. However, model formulations with more complex predation and competition interactions can reverse the expected responses for some species, resulting in catch declines for some fished species and localized declines of turtle and marine mammal populations under primary productivity increases. We conclude that climate‐driven primary production change needs to be considered by marine ecosystem managers and more specifically, that production increases can simultaneously benefit fisheries and conservation. Greater focus on incorporating predation and competition interactions into models will significantly improve the ability to identify species and industries most at risk from climate change.
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2010 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2010Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2010 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2010Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Conference object , Journal 2020 Germany, Australia, Spain, Australia, SpainPublisher:Frontiers Media SA Funded by:NSERC, EC | TRIATLASNSERC ,EC| TRIATLASMarta Coll; Marta Coll; Jeroen Steenbeek; Maria Grazia Pennino; Joe Buszowski; Kristin Kaschner; Heike K. Lotze; Yannick Rousseau; Derek P. Tittensor; Carl Walters; Reg A. Watson; Villy Christensen;handle: 10508/14827 , 10261/326104 , 10261/221916
Considerable effort is being deployed to predict the impacts of climate change and anthropogenic activities on the ocean's biophysical environment, biodiversity, and natural resources to better understand how marine ecosystems and provided services to humans are likely to change and explore alternative pathways and options. We present an updated version of EcoOcean (v2), a spatial-temporal ecosystem modeling complex of the global ocean that spans food-web dynamics from primary producers to top predators. Advancements include an enhanced ability to reproduce spatial-temporal ecosystem dynamics by linking species productivity, distributions, and trophic interactions to the impacts of climate change and worldwide fisheries. The updated modeling platform is used to simulate past and future scenarios of change, where we quantify the impacts of alternative configurations of the ecological model, responses to climate-change scenarios, and the additional impacts of fishing. Climate-change scenarios are obtained from two Earth-System Models (ESMs, GFDL-ESM2M, and IPSL-CMA5-LR) and two contrasting emission pathways (RCPs 2.6 and 8.5) for historical (1950–2005) and future (2006–2100) periods. Standardized ecological indicators and biomasses of selected species groups are used to compare simulations. Results show how future ecological trajectories are sensitive to alternative configurations of EcoOcean, and yield moderate differences when looking at ecological indicators and larger differences for biomasses of species groups. Ecological trajectories are also sensitive to environmental drivers from alternative ESM outputs and RCPs, and show spatial variability and more severe changes when IPSL and RCP 8.5 are used. Under a non-fishing configuration, larger organisms show decreasing trends, while smaller organisms show mixed or increasing results. Fishing intensifies the negative effects predicted by climate change, again stronger under IPSL and RCP 8.5, which results in stronger biomass declines for species already losing under climate change, or dampened positive impacts for those increasing. Several species groups that win under climate change become losers under combined impacts, while only a few (small benthopelagic fish and cephalopods) species are projected to show positive biomass changes under cumulative impacts. EcoOcean v2 can contribute to the quantification of cumulative impact assessments of multiple stressors and of plausible ocean-based solutions to prevent, mitigate and adapt to global change
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2023Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARepositorio Institucional Digital del IEOArticle . 2021Data sources: Repositorio Institucional Digital del IEOFrontiers in Marine ScienceArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2023Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARepositorio Institucional Digital del IEOArticle . 2021Data sources: Repositorio Institucional Digital del IEOFrontiers in Marine ScienceArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2024 SpainPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:EC | FutureMARESEC| FutureMARESAuthors: Coll, Marta; Bellido, José María; Pennino, Maria Grazia; Albo-Puigserver, Marta; +12 AuthorsColl, Marta; Bellido, José María; Pennino, Maria Grazia; Albo-Puigserver, Marta; Báez, José Carlos; Christensen, Villy; Corrales, Xavier; Fernández-Corredor, Elena; Giménez, Joan; Julià, Laura; Lloret-Lloret, Elena; Macias, Diego; Ouled-Cheikh, Jazel; Ramírez, Francisco; Sbragaglia, Valerio; Steenbeek, Jeroen;In the Western Mediterranean Sea, forage fishes have changed in abundance, body condition, growth, reproduction, and distribution in the last decades. Different hypotheses have been proposed to explain these changes, including increase in fishing mortality; changes in environmental conditions affecting species fitness, and planktonic productivity and quality; recovery of top predators; and increase in competitors. We investigated the main drivers and changes of the pelagic ecosystem and their effects using an ecosystem-based modelling approach. Specifically, we (1) quantified the potential historical contribution of various drivers of change, (2) investigated changes in temporal trends and spatial distributions of main ecosystem components, and (3) identified ecological consequences of these changes in top predator and competitors, their fisheries and ecosystem traits during 2000-2020. We updated an established Ecopath food-web model representing the Spanish and French Mediterranean sub-areas (GSA06 and GSA07) in 2000 with recent available data. We applied the temporal dynamic Ecosim module, and tested historical time series of fishing effort, fishing mortality and environmental factors as potential drivers. Observed biomass and landings of key species were used to validate model projections. A spatial-temporal Ecospace model was developed to project species distribution changes. Results showed historical biomass and catch changes driven by a combination of high fishing pressure and environmental change (i.e. increase in temperature and salinity, and decline in primary productivity). Small pelagic fish showed significant temporal changes and predicted shifts in their distributions, following a latitudinal gradient. Predators and competitors showed changes as well, displaying heterogeneous spatial patterns, while fisheries landings declined. Overall, results matched observations (e.g., decline of sardine, fluctuations of anchovy and increases in bluefin tuna) and illustrated the need to complement traditional assessments with integrative frameworks to move towards an ecosystem-based approach in the Mediterranean. They also highlighted important knowledge gaps to guide future research in the region.
Recolector de Cienci... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2024 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAThe Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2024 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: CrossrefThe Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portaladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert Recolector de Cienci... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2024 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAThe Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2024 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: CrossrefThe Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portaladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2020 France, Spain, Australia, AustraliaPublisher:Frontiers Media SA Funded by:NSERC, EC | FutureMARES, ANR | SOMBEE +1 projectsNSERC ,EC| FutureMARES ,ANR| SOMBEE ,EC| TRIATLASJohanna J. Heymans; Alida Bundy; Villy Christensen; Marta Coll; Marta Coll; Kim de Mutsert; Elizabeth A. Fulton; Elizabeth A. Fulton; Chiara Piroddi; Yunne-Jai Shin; Jeroen Steenbeek; Morgane Travers-Trolet;handle: 10261/220707
Managing for the Future: Understanding the Relative Roles of Climate and Fishing on Structure and Dynamics of Marine Ecosystems.-- 5 pages, 1 figure The UN declared the 2021–2030 as the Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (Ocean Decade). The Ocean Decade's vision is to “develop scientific knowledge, build infrastructure and foster relationships for a sustainable and healthy ocean.” The Ocean Decade aims to achieve six societal outcomes: (1) A clean ocean, through identifying and removing sources of pollution; (2) A healthy and resilient ocean, with mapped and protected marine ecosystems; (3) A predicted ocean, enabling society to understand current and future ocean conditions; (4) A safe ocean, protecting people from ocean hazards; (5) A sustainably harvested ocean, providing food and resources for the blue economy; and (6) A transparent ocean, giving citizens equitable access to data, information and technologies. It also aims to provide concrete scientific support to coastal management, adaptation and restoration, marine spatial planning, marine protected areas, fisheries management, sustainable expansion of the blue economy, nationally determined contributions to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), national ocean policies, development of national Research and Development (R&D), capacity development, and early warning systems. The Ocean Decade offers the ocean science community a unique opportunity to change the way we support sustainable development and galvanize ocean sciences for the future (Ryabinin et al., 2019). In addition, the UN Decade for Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030), gives the ocean science community an imperative to work toward a sustainable future for the ocean. We challenge the marine ecosystem modeling community to address how we: (i) enable ocean managers and decision-makers to use our science, (ii) communicate our science, and most importantly (iii) ensure co-design of our science to achieve sustainable development. For this, we define ecosystem models as those that span physical and human drivers of change in the full ecosystem from plankton to top predators Y-jS and MT-T have been partially funded by the Biodiversa and Belmont Forum project SOMBEE (BiodivScen programme, ANR contract N°ANR-18-EBI4-0003-01). MC and JS were funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N° 817578 (TRIATLAS project) and MC also received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N° 869300 (FutureMARES project). VC acknowledges support through NSERC Discovery Grant RGPIN-2019-04901 With the funding support of the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S), of the Spanish Research Agency (AEI) Peer reviewed
Frontiers in Marine ... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerOther literature type . 2020Data sources: ArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerFrontiers in Marine ScienceArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert Frontiers in Marine ... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerOther literature type . 2020Data sources: ArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerFrontiers in Marine ScienceArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Preprint 2022Publisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:NSERC, EC | EcoScope, EC | TRIATLASNSERC ,EC| EcoScope ,EC| TRIATLASStock, A.; Murray, C.C.; Gregr, E.J.; Steenbeek, J.; Woodburn, E.; Michele, F.; Christensen, V.; Chan, K.M.A.;pmid: 36693571
Understanding the cumulative effects of multiple stressors is a research priority in environmental science. Ecological models are a key component of tackling this challenge because they can simulate interactions between the components of an ecosystem. Here, we ask, how has the popular modeling platform Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) been used to model human impacts related to climate change, land and sea use, pollution, and invasive species? We conducted a literature review encompassing 166 studies covering stressors other than fishing mostly in aquatic ecosystems. The most modeled stressors were physical climate change (60 studies), species introductions (22), habitat loss (21), and eutrophication (20), using a range of modeling techniques. Despite this comprehensive coverage, we identified four gaps that must be filled to harness the potential of EwE for studying multiple stressor effects. First, only 12% of studies investigated three or more stressors, with most studies focusing on single stressors. Furthermore, many studies modeled only one of many pathways through which each stressor is known to affect ecosystems. Second, various methods have been applied to define environmental response functions representing the effects of single stressors on species groups. These functions can have a large effect on the simulated ecological changes, but best practices for deriving them are yet to emerge. Third, human dimensions of environmental change – except for fisheries – were rarely considered. Fourth, only 3% of studies used statistical research designs that allow attribution of simulated ecosystem changes to stressors’ direct effects and interactions, such as factorial (computational) experiments. None made full use of the statistical possibilities that arise when simulations can be repeated many times with controlled changes to the inputs. We argue that all four gaps are feasibly filled by integrating ecological modeling with advances in other subfields of environmental science and in computational statistics.
OSF Preprints arrow_drop_down The Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefThe Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portalhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sc...Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portaladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert OSF Preprints arrow_drop_down The Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefThe Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portalhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sc...Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portaladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2019 France, France, United States, France, Germany, Australia, United Kingdom, Spain, France, Spain, France, France, AustraliaPublisher:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Funded by:EC | MERCES, NSERC, EC | BIGSEA +1 projectsEC| MERCES ,NSERC ,EC| BIGSEA ,EC| CERESDavid A. Carozza; Steve Mackinson; Jeroen Steenbeek; Villy Christensen; Philippe Verley; Susa Niiranen; Andrea Bryndum-Buchholz; Matthias Büchner; Derek P. Tittensor; Derek P. Tittensor; Jan Volkholz; John P. Dunne; Elizabeth A. Fulton; Julia L. Blanchard; Ricardo Oliveros-Ramos; Jacob Schewe; Simon Jennings; Simon Jennings; Manuel Barange; Charles A. Stock; Boris Worm; Miranda C. Jones; Nicola D. Walker; Laurent Bopp; Olivier Maury; Olivier Maury; William W. L. Cheung; Tiago H. Silva; Daniele Bianchi; Heike K. Lotze; Tilla Roy; Catherine M. Bulman; Tyler D. Eddy; Tyler D. Eddy; Nicolas Barrier; Marta Coll; Eric D. Galbraith; Eric D. Galbraith; Jose A. Fernandes; Yunne-Jai Shin; Yunne-Jai Shin;While the physical dimensions of climate change are now routinely assessed through multimodel intercomparisons, projected impacts on the global ocean ecosystem generally rely on individual models with a specific set of assumptions. To address these single-model limitations, we present standardized ensemble projections from six global marine ecosystem models forced with two Earth system models and four emission scenarios with and without fishing. We derive average biomass trends and associated uncertainties across the marine food web. Without fishing, mean global animal biomass decreased by 5% (±4% SD) under low emissions and 17% (±11% SD) under high emissions by 2100, with an average 5% decline for every 1 °C of warming. Projected biomass declines were primarily driven by increasing temperature and decreasing primary production, and were more pronounced at higher trophic levels, a process known as trophic amplification. Fishing did not substantially alter the effects of climate change. Considerable regional variation featured strong biomass increases at high latitudes and decreases at middle to low latitudes, with good model agreement on the direction of change but variable magnitude. Uncertainties due to variations in marine ecosystem and Earth system models were similar. Ensemble projections performed well compared with empirical data, emphasizing the benefits of multimodel inference to project future outcomes. Our results indicate that global ocean animal biomass consistently declines with climate change, and that these impacts are amplified at higher trophic levels. Next steps for model development include dynamic scenarios of fishing, cumulative human impacts, and the effects of management measures on future ocean biomass trends.
University of East A... arrow_drop_down University of East Anglia digital repositoryArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: University of East Anglia digital repositoryUniversity of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0tf378n8Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2019License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-02272161Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Bretagne Occidentale: HALArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-02272161Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: CrossrefRecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2019Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTADiposit Digital de Documents de la UABArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Diposit Digital de Documents de la UABeScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2019Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerOther literature type . 2019Data sources: ArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert University of East A... arrow_drop_down University of East Anglia digital repositoryArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: University of East Anglia digital repositoryUniversity of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0tf378n8Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2019License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-02272161Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Bretagne Occidentale: HALArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-02272161Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: CrossrefRecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2019Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTADiposit Digital de Documents de la UABArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Diposit Digital de Documents de la UABeScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2019Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerOther literature type . 2019Data sources: ArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2019License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesArticle . 2019 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2019Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2009 United KingdomPublisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Funded by:NSF | Intestinal Bicarbonate Se..., NSF | Intestinal Bicarbonate Se..., UKRI | Novel driving forces for ... +2 projectsNSF| Intestinal Bicarbonate Secretion in Marine Teleost Fish ,NSF| Intestinal Bicarbonate Secretion, Osmoregulation and Acid-Base Balance in Marine Fish ,UKRI| Novel driving forces for water transport & osmoregulation: carbonate precipitation and osmotic coefficients ,NSERC ,NSF| SGER: Development of Equipement and Methodology for Simultaneous Measurements of Epithelial Transport and Oxygen ConsumptionJosi R. Taylor; Frank J. Millero; Villy Christensen; Patrick J. Walsh; Patrick J. Walsh; Simon Jennings; Martin Grosell; Rod W. Wilson;pmid: 19150840
Oceanic production of calcium carbonate is conventionally attributed to marine plankton (coccolithophores and foraminifera). Here we report that marine fish produce precipitated carbonates within their intestines and excrete these at high rates. When combined with estimates of global fish biomass, this suggests that marine fish contribute 3 to 15% of total oceanic carbonate production. Fish carbonates have a higher magnesium content and solubility than traditional sources, yielding faster dissolution with depth. This may explain up to a quarter of the increase in titratable alkalinity within 1000 meters of the ocean surface, a controversial phenomenon that has puzzled oceanographers for decades. We also predict that fish carbonate production may rise in response to future environmental changes in carbon dioxide, and thus become an increasingly important component of the inorganic carbon cycle.
Science arrow_drop_down University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2009Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert Science arrow_drop_down University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2009Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Conference object , Other literature type , Journal 2018 United Kingdom, France, France, France, France, France, Spain, United Kingdom, Canada, France, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, Germany, SpainPublisher:Copernicus GmbH Funded by:EC | BIOWEB, NSERC, ARC | Discovery Projects - Gran... +2 projectsEC| BIOWEB ,NSERC ,ARC| Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP140101377 ,EC| BIGSEA ,EC| CERESD. P. Tittensor; D. P. Tittensor; T. D. Eddy; T. D. Eddy; H. K. Lotze; E. D. Galbraith; E. D. Galbraith; W. Cheung; M. Barange; M. Barange; J. L. Blanchard; L. Bopp; A. Bryndum-Buchholz; M. Büchner; C. Bulman; D. A. Carozza; V. Christensen; M. Coll; M. Coll; M. Coll; J. P. Dunne; J. A. Fernandes; J. A. Fernandes; E. A. Fulton; E. A. Fulton; A. J. Hobday; A. J. Hobday; V. Huber; S. Jennings; S. Jennings; S. Jennings; M. Jones; P. Lehodey; J. S. Link; S. Mackinson; O. Maury; O. Maury; S. Niiranen; R. Oliveros-Ramos; T. Roy; T. Roy; J. Schewe; Y.-J. Shin; Y.-J. Shin; T. Silva; C. A. Stock; J. Steenbeek; P. J. Underwood; J. Volkholz; J. R. Watson; N. D. Walker;handle: 10261/165167
Abstract. Model intercomparison studies in the climate and Earth sciences communities have been crucial to building credibility and coherence for future projections. They have quantified variability among models, spurred model development, contrasted within- and among-model uncertainty, assessed model fits to historical data, and provided ensemble projections of future change under specified scenarios. Given the speed and magnitude of anthropogenic change in the marine environment and the consequent effects on food security, biodiversity, marine industries, and society, the time is ripe for similar comparisons among models of fisheries and marine ecosystems. Here, we describe the Fisheries and Marine Ecosystem Model Intercomparison Project protocol version 1.0 (Fish-MIP v1.0), part of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP), which is a cross-sectoral network of climate impact modellers. Given the complexity of the marine ecosystem, this class of models has substantial heterogeneity of purpose, scope, theoretical underpinning, processes considered, parameterizations, resolution (grain size), and spatial extent. This heterogeneity reflects the lack of a unified understanding of the marine ecosystem and implies that the assemblage of all models is more likely to include a greater number of relevant processes than any single model. The current Fish-MIP protocol is designed to allow these heterogeneous models to be forced with common Earth System Model (ESM) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) outputs under prescribed scenarios for historic (from the 1950s) and future (to 2100) time periods; it will be adapted to CMIP phase 6 (CMIP6) in future iterations. It also describes a standardized set of outputs for each participating Fish-MIP model to produce. This enables the broad characterization of differences between and uncertainties within models and projections when assessing climate and fisheries impacts on marine ecosystems and the services they provide. The systematic generation, collation, and comparison of results from Fish-MIP will inform an understanding of the range of plausible changes in marine ecosystems and improve our capacity to define and convey the strengths and weaknesses of model-based advice on future states of marine ecosystems and fisheries. Ultimately, Fish-MIP represents a step towards bringing together the marine ecosystem modelling community to produce consistent ensemble medium- and long-term projections of marine ecosystems.
Plymouth Marine Scie... arrow_drop_down Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMEA)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: CORE (RIOXX-UK Aggregator)University of East Anglia digital repositoryArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: University of East Anglia digital repositoryUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806877Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Memorial University of Newfoundland: Research RepositoryArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806877Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTADiposit Digital de Documents de la UABArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Diposit Digital de Documents de la UABArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerOther literature type . 2018Data sources: ArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerGeoscientific Model DevelopmentArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portaladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert Plymouth Marine Scie... arrow_drop_down Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMEA)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: CORE (RIOXX-UK Aggregator)University of East Anglia digital repositoryArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: University of East Anglia digital repositoryUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806877Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Memorial University of Newfoundland: Research RepositoryArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of East Anglia: UEA Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2018Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-01806877Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTADiposit Digital de Documents de la UABArticle . 2018License: CC BYData sources: Diposit Digital de Documents de la UABArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerOther literature type . 2018Data sources: ArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerGeoscientific Model DevelopmentArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portaladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021Publisher:Elsevier BV Authors: José Juan Castro Hernández; Villy Christensen; Lorena Couce Montero;pmid: 33984556
The ecological system conformed by the islands of Tenerife and La Gomera (Canary Islands) is characterized though the trophic network. The indicators obtained by the Ecopath model show a stressed and still developing ecosystem, probably related to inadequate management of the fisheries that takes place in this area, focused on high trophic level species. The Ecosim and Ecospace modules have been used to provide comparative assessment of three management scenarios addressed to evaluate the impact of fishing, both professional and recreational, on the marine ecosystem, as well as the spatial evolution of the fishing effort in a projection period going from 2021 to 2030, that can be applied in decision-making and planning in the short and medium term. In all the simulated scenarios, a drastic reduction in the biomass of pelagic species was observed, including the trophic guild of pelagic sharks that the model identifies as key species for the correct functioning of this marine ecosystem. Despite the existing information gaps, the results seem to confirm that the intense exploitation to which some functional groups have been subjected in the past has left its mark on the ecosystem, requiring a significant fishing effort reduction to attempt a recovery of the stocks. It is strongly recommended the implementation of a recreational fishing data collection system with less uncertainty, due to its significant role in the state of this ecological system.
Recolector de Cienci... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2021Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAMarine Environmental ResearchArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert Recolector de Cienci... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2021Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAMarine Environmental ResearchArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2020Publisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Edward J. Gregr; Villy Christensen; Linda Nichol; Rebecca G. Martone; Russell W. Markel; Jane C. Watson; Christopher D. G. Harley; Evgeny A. Pakhomov; Jonathan B. Shurin; Kai M. A. Chan;pmid: 32527830
The benefits of ecosystem restorationHuman activities have fundamentally altered many ecosystems. Recent successful restoration efforts have led to healthier ecosystems, but this has led to a disruption in economies dependent on the altered state of the system. One of the best-known trophic cascades is the sea otter–kelp forest system, wherein recovery of once extirpated sea otters is bringing back biodiverse and healthy kelp forests but reducing the abundance of harvested shellfish. Gregret al.looked at the costs and benefits of this shift and found that for key trade-offs, the value of kelp forest–associated features such as tourism, fin fish fisheries, and carbon capture outweighed the losses to economies (see the Perspective by Estes and Carswell). Thus, ecosystem recovery can benefit both ecosystems and economies.Science, this issue p.1243; see also p.1178
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2010 AustraliaPublisher:Wiley Elizabeth A. Fulton; S.J. Metcalf; Richard J. Matear; Robyn E. Forrest; Anthony J. Richardson; Anthony J. Richardson; Villy Christensen; Neil Gribble; Reg Watson; C Bulman; Christopher J. Brown; Christopher J. Brown; Hugh P. Possingham; Alistair J. Hobday; Hector Lozano-Montes; Shane P. Griffiths; Thomas A. Okey; Peter C. Gehrke; José M. Martín;AbstractClimate change is altering the rate and distribution of primary production in the world's oceans. Primary production is critical to maintaining biodiversity and supporting fishery catches, but predicting the response of populations to primary production change is complicated by predation and competition interactions. We simulated the effects of change in primary production on diverse marine ecosystems across a wide latitudinal range in Australia using the marine food web model Ecosim. We link models of primary production of lower trophic levels (phytoplankton and benthic producers) under climate change with Ecosim to predict changes in fishery catch, fishery value, biomass of animals of conservation interest, and indicators of community composition. Under a plausible climate change scenario, primary production will increase around Australia and generally this benefits fisheries catch and value and leads to increased biomass of threatened marine animals such as turtles and sharks. However, community composition is not strongly affected. Sensitivity analyses indicate overall positive linear responses of functional groups to primary production change. Responses are robust to the ecosystem type and the complexity of the model used. However, model formulations with more complex predation and competition interactions can reverse the expected responses for some species, resulting in catch declines for some fished species and localized declines of turtle and marine mammal populations under primary productivity increases. We conclude that climate‐driven primary production change needs to be considered by marine ecosystem managers and more specifically, that production increases can simultaneously benefit fisheries and conservation. Greater focus on incorporating predation and competition interactions into models will significantly improve the ability to identify species and industries most at risk from climate change.
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2010 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2010Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2010 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefThe University of Queensland: UQ eSpaceArticle . 2010Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Conference object , Journal 2020 Germany, Australia, Spain, Australia, SpainPublisher:Frontiers Media SA Funded by:NSERC, EC | TRIATLASNSERC ,EC| TRIATLASMarta Coll; Marta Coll; Jeroen Steenbeek; Maria Grazia Pennino; Joe Buszowski; Kristin Kaschner; Heike K. Lotze; Yannick Rousseau; Derek P. Tittensor; Carl Walters; Reg A. Watson; Villy Christensen;handle: 10508/14827 , 10261/326104 , 10261/221916
Considerable effort is being deployed to predict the impacts of climate change and anthropogenic activities on the ocean's biophysical environment, biodiversity, and natural resources to better understand how marine ecosystems and provided services to humans are likely to change and explore alternative pathways and options. We present an updated version of EcoOcean (v2), a spatial-temporal ecosystem modeling complex of the global ocean that spans food-web dynamics from primary producers to top predators. Advancements include an enhanced ability to reproduce spatial-temporal ecosystem dynamics by linking species productivity, distributions, and trophic interactions to the impacts of climate change and worldwide fisheries. The updated modeling platform is used to simulate past and future scenarios of change, where we quantify the impacts of alternative configurations of the ecological model, responses to climate-change scenarios, and the additional impacts of fishing. Climate-change scenarios are obtained from two Earth-System Models (ESMs, GFDL-ESM2M, and IPSL-CMA5-LR) and two contrasting emission pathways (RCPs 2.6 and 8.5) for historical (1950–2005) and future (2006–2100) periods. Standardized ecological indicators and biomasses of selected species groups are used to compare simulations. Results show how future ecological trajectories are sensitive to alternative configurations of EcoOcean, and yield moderate differences when looking at ecological indicators and larger differences for biomasses of species groups. Ecological trajectories are also sensitive to environmental drivers from alternative ESM outputs and RCPs, and show spatial variability and more severe changes when IPSL and RCP 8.5 are used. Under a non-fishing configuration, larger organisms show decreasing trends, while smaller organisms show mixed or increasing results. Fishing intensifies the negative effects predicted by climate change, again stronger under IPSL and RCP 8.5, which results in stronger biomass declines for species already losing under climate change, or dampened positive impacts for those increasing. Several species groups that win under climate change become losers under combined impacts, while only a few (small benthopelagic fish and cephalopods) species are projected to show positive biomass changes under cumulative impacts. EcoOcean v2 can contribute to the quantification of cumulative impact assessments of multiple stressors and of plausible ocean-based solutions to prevent, mitigate and adapt to global change
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2023Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARepositorio Institucional Digital del IEOArticle . 2021Data sources: Repositorio Institucional Digital del IEOFrontiers in Marine ScienceArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2023Data sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARecolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTARepositorio Institucional Digital del IEOArticle . 2021Data sources: Repositorio Institucional Digital del IEOFrontiers in Marine ScienceArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2024 SpainPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:EC | FutureMARESEC| FutureMARESAuthors: Coll, Marta; Bellido, José María; Pennino, Maria Grazia; Albo-Puigserver, Marta; +12 AuthorsColl, Marta; Bellido, José María; Pennino, Maria Grazia; Albo-Puigserver, Marta; Báez, José Carlos; Christensen, Villy; Corrales, Xavier; Fernández-Corredor, Elena; Giménez, Joan; Julià, Laura; Lloret-Lloret, Elena; Macias, Diego; Ouled-Cheikh, Jazel; Ramírez, Francisco; Sbragaglia, Valerio; Steenbeek, Jeroen;In the Western Mediterranean Sea, forage fishes have changed in abundance, body condition, growth, reproduction, and distribution in the last decades. Different hypotheses have been proposed to explain these changes, including increase in fishing mortality; changes in environmental conditions affecting species fitness, and planktonic productivity and quality; recovery of top predators; and increase in competitors. We investigated the main drivers and changes of the pelagic ecosystem and their effects using an ecosystem-based modelling approach. Specifically, we (1) quantified the potential historical contribution of various drivers of change, (2) investigated changes in temporal trends and spatial distributions of main ecosystem components, and (3) identified ecological consequences of these changes in top predator and competitors, their fisheries and ecosystem traits during 2000-2020. We updated an established Ecopath food-web model representing the Spanish and French Mediterranean sub-areas (GSA06 and GSA07) in 2000 with recent available data. We applied the temporal dynamic Ecosim module, and tested historical time series of fishing effort, fishing mortality and environmental factors as potential drivers. Observed biomass and landings of key species were used to validate model projections. A spatial-temporal Ecospace model was developed to project species distribution changes. Results showed historical biomass and catch changes driven by a combination of high fishing pressure and environmental change (i.e. increase in temperature and salinity, and decline in primary productivity). Small pelagic fish showed significant temporal changes and predicted shifts in their distributions, following a latitudinal gradient. Predators and competitors showed changes as well, displaying heterogeneous spatial patterns, while fisheries landings declined. Overall, results matched observations (e.g., decline of sardine, fluctuations of anchovy and increases in bluefin tuna) and illustrated the need to complement traditional assessments with integrative frameworks to move towards an ecosystem-based approach in the Mediterranean. They also highlighted important knowledge gaps to guide future research in the region.
Recolector de Cienci... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2024 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAThe Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2024 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: CrossrefThe Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portaladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert Recolector de Cienci... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2024 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAThe Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2024 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: CrossrefThe Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portaladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2020 France, Spain, Australia, AustraliaPublisher:Frontiers Media SA Funded by:NSERC, EC | FutureMARES, ANR | SOMBEE +1 projectsNSERC ,EC| FutureMARES ,ANR| SOMBEE ,EC| TRIATLASJohanna J. Heymans; Alida Bundy; Villy Christensen; Marta Coll; Marta Coll; Kim de Mutsert; Elizabeth A. Fulton; Elizabeth A. Fulton; Chiara Piroddi; Yunne-Jai Shin; Jeroen Steenbeek; Morgane Travers-Trolet;handle: 10261/220707
Managing for the Future: Understanding the Relative Roles of Climate and Fishing on Structure and Dynamics of Marine Ecosystems.-- 5 pages, 1 figure The UN declared the 2021–2030 as the Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (Ocean Decade). The Ocean Decade's vision is to “develop scientific knowledge, build infrastructure and foster relationships for a sustainable and healthy ocean.” The Ocean Decade aims to achieve six societal outcomes: (1) A clean ocean, through identifying and removing sources of pollution; (2) A healthy and resilient ocean, with mapped and protected marine ecosystems; (3) A predicted ocean, enabling society to understand current and future ocean conditions; (4) A safe ocean, protecting people from ocean hazards; (5) A sustainably harvested ocean, providing food and resources for the blue economy; and (6) A transparent ocean, giving citizens equitable access to data, information and technologies. It also aims to provide concrete scientific support to coastal management, adaptation and restoration, marine spatial planning, marine protected areas, fisheries management, sustainable expansion of the blue economy, nationally determined contributions to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), national ocean policies, development of national Research and Development (R&D), capacity development, and early warning systems. The Ocean Decade offers the ocean science community a unique opportunity to change the way we support sustainable development and galvanize ocean sciences for the future (Ryabinin et al., 2019). In addition, the UN Decade for Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030), gives the ocean science community an imperative to work toward a sustainable future for the ocean. We challenge the marine ecosystem modeling community to address how we: (i) enable ocean managers and decision-makers to use our science, (ii) communicate our science, and most importantly (iii) ensure co-design of our science to achieve sustainable development. For this, we define ecosystem models as those that span physical and human drivers of change in the full ecosystem from plankton to top predators Y-jS and MT-T have been partially funded by the Biodiversa and Belmont Forum project SOMBEE (BiodivScen programme, ANR contract N°ANR-18-EBI4-0003-01). MC and JS were funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N° 817578 (TRIATLAS project) and MC also received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N° 869300 (FutureMARES project). VC acknowledges support through NSERC Discovery Grant RGPIN-2019-04901 With the funding support of the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S), of the Spanish Research Agency (AEI) Peer reviewed
Frontiers in Marine ... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerOther literature type . 2020Data sources: ArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerFrontiers in Marine ScienceArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert Frontiers in Marine ... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerOther literature type . 2020Data sources: ArchiMer - Institutional Archive of IfremerFrontiers in Marine ScienceArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2020Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Preprint 2022Publisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:NSERC, EC | EcoScope, EC | TRIATLASNSERC ,EC| EcoScope ,EC| TRIATLASStock, A.; Murray, C.C.; Gregr, E.J.; Steenbeek, J.; Woodburn, E.; Michele, F.; Christensen, V.; Chan, K.M.A.;pmid: 36693571
Understanding the cumulative effects of multiple stressors is a research priority in environmental science. Ecological models are a key component of tackling this challenge because they can simulate interactions between the components of an ecosystem. Here, we ask, how has the popular modeling platform Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) been used to model human impacts related to climate change, land and sea use, pollution, and invasive species? We conducted a literature review encompassing 166 studies covering stressors other than fishing mostly in aquatic ecosystems. The most modeled stressors were physical climate change (60 studies), species introductions (22), habitat loss (21), and eutrophication (20), using a range of modeling techniques. Despite this comprehensive coverage, we identified four gaps that must be filled to harness the potential of EwE for studying multiple stressor effects. First, only 12% of studies investigated three or more stressors, with most studies focusing on single stressors. Furthermore, many studies modeled only one of many pathways through which each stressor is known to affect ecosystems. Second, various methods have been applied to define environmental response functions representing the effects of single stressors on species groups. These functions can have a large effect on the simulated ecological changes, but best practices for deriving them are yet to emerge. Third, human dimensions of environmental change – except for fisheries – were rarely considered. Fourth, only 3% of studies used statistical research designs that allow attribution of simulated ecosystem changes to stressors’ direct effects and interactions, such as factorial (computational) experiments. None made full use of the statistical possibilities that arise when simulations can be repeated many times with controlled changes to the inputs. We argue that all four gaps are feasibly filled by integrating ecological modeling with advances in other subfields of environmental science and in computational statistics.
OSF Preprints arrow_drop_down The Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefThe Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portalhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sc...Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portaladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.more_vert OSF Preprints arrow_drop_down The Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefThe Science of The Total EnvironmentArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portalhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sc...Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data Portaladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
