- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014 France, Germany, France, United Kingdom, France, France, France, Spain, Finland, United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Davide Cammarano; Davide Cammarano; Matthew P. Reynolds; Fulu Tao; Curtis D. Jones; Bruce A. Kimball; Mikhail A. Semenov; Garry O'Leary; Yan Zhu; David B. Lobell; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Sebastian Gayler; Bruno Basso; Jørgen E. Olesen; Pierre Martre; Pierre Martre; Jordi Doltra; Taru Palosuo; Daniel Wallach; P. V. V. Prasad; Elias Fereres; Frank Ewert; Reimund P. Rötter; Andrew J. Challinor; Andrew J. Challinor; Ann-Kristin Koehler; Pierre Stratonovitch; Thilo Streck; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Joost Wolf; Claudio O. Stöckle; Zhigan Zhao; Zhigan Zhao; Peter J. Thorburn; Iurii Shcherbak; Iwan Supit; Claas Nendel; Christian Biernath; Eckart Priesack; Enli Wang; Christoph Müller; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Mohamed Jabloun; Margarita Garcia-Vila; L. A. Hunt; Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei; S. Naresh Kumar; Jakarat Anothai; Jakarat Anothai; Katharina Waha; G. De Sanctis; G. De Sanctis; Senthold Asseng; Phillip D. Alderman; Jeffrey W. White; Michael J. Ottman; Alex C. Ruane; Gerard W. Wall;doi: 10.1038/nclimate2470
handle: 10261/158875 , 10568/57488 , 10900/64900
Asseng, S. et al. Crop models are essential tools for assessing the threat of climate change to local and global food production1. Present models used to predict wheat grain yield are highly uncertain when simulating how crops respond to temperature2. Here we systematically tested 30 different wheat crop models of the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project against field experiments in which growing season mean temperatures ranged from 15 °C to 32 °C, including experiments with artificial heating. Many models simulated yields well, but were less accurate at higher temperatures. The model ensemble median was consistently more accurate in simulating the crop temperature response than any single model, regardless of the input information used. Extrapolating the model ensemble temperature response indicates that warming is already slowing yield gains at a majority of wheat-growing locations. Global wheat production is estimated to fall by 6% for each °C of further temperature increase and become more variable over space and time. We thank the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project and its leaders C. Rosenzweig from NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Columbia University (USA), J. Jones from University of Florida (USA), J. Hatfield from United States Department of Agriculture (USA) and J. Antle from Oregon State University (USA) for support. We also thank M. Lopez from CIMMYT (Turkey), M. Usman Bashir from University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (Pakistan), S. Soufizadeh from Shahid Beheshti University (Iran), and J. Lorgeou and J-C. Deswarte from ARVALIS—Institut du Végétal (France) for assistance with selecting key locations and quantifying regional crop cultivars, anthesis and maturity dates and R. Raymundo for assistance with GIS. S.A. and D.C. received financial support from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). C.S. was funded through USDA National Institute for Food and Agriculture award 32011-68002-30191. C.M. received financial support from the KULUNDA project (01LL0905L) and the FACCE MACSUR project (031A103B) funded through the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). F.E. received support from the FACCE MACSUR project (031A103B) funded through the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2812ERA115) and E.E.R. was funded through the German Science Foundation (project EW 119/5-1). M.J. and J.E.O. were funded through the FACCE MACSUR project by the Danish Strategic Research Council. K.C.K. and C.N. were funded by the FACCE MACSUR project through the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL). F.T., T.P. and R.P.R. received financial support from FACCE MACSUR project funded through the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MMM); F.T. was also funded through National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41071030). C.B. was funded through the Helmholtz project ‘REKLIM—Regional Climate Change: Causes and Effects’ Topic 9: ‘Climate Change and Air Quality’. M.P.R. and P.D.A. received funding from the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food Security (CCAFS). G.O’L. was funded through the Australian Grains Research and Development Corporation and the Department of Environment and Primary Industries Victoria, Australia. R.C.I. was funded by Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University. E.W. and Z.Z. were funded by CSIRO and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) through the research project ‘Advancing crop yield while reducing the use of water and nitrogen’ and by the CSIRO-MoE PhD Research Program. Peer reviewed
CORE arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2015Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/57488Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAEberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Göttingen Research Online PublicationsArticle . 2017Data sources: Göttingen Research Online PublicationsInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2470&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert CORE arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2015Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/57488Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAEberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Göttingen Research Online PublicationsArticle . 2017Data sources: Göttingen Research Online PublicationsInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2470&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2005 ItalyPublisher:Elsevier BV Authors: SARTORI, LUIGI; Basso B; Bertocco M; Oliviero G.;handle: 11577/2474689 , 11563/1695 , 11563/18038
The conservation of natural resources is the most important key for a sustainable agriculture, especially considering the decreasing conditional subsidies of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU) for the coming years: the lower economic supports oblige farms to increase efficiency to reduce production costs, whilst given the interaction of agricultural activities with environment quality, appropriate natural resources management will be a crucial aspect for farms. The paper examines the efficiency of agricultural production systems and particularly the efficiency of energy use in a 3-yr soya bean, maize and wheat rotation. The study also aimed to analyse the production cost and the role of EU subsidies on farm strategies for important emerging management systems namely conservation farming (CF) and organic farming (OF) systems. Experiments were carried out in NE Italy, on a farm situated near Rovigo. Energy inputs were generally higher in the CF system but counterbalanced by a higher yield (output), while the OF system had generally reduced energy use (due to no chemical inputs) but lower yield. The economic net return was higher for the CF system, but when the economic subsidies from EU were considered, the integrated net return was higher in the OF system for soya bean and wheat.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.03.010&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.03.010&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2018 Denmark, France, Italy, Italy, United Kingdom, Spain, Denmark, France, Italy, Netherlands, Italy, Germany, Netherlands, United States, France, FinlandPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:AKA | Pathways linking uncertai..., MIUR, AKA | Pathways for linking unce... +2 projectsAKA| Pathways linking uncertainties in model projections of climate and its effects / Consortium: PLUMES ,MIUR ,AKA| Pathways for linking uncertainties in model projections of climate and its effects / Consortium: PLUMES ,EC| IMPRESSIONS ,AKA| Pathways for linking uncertainties in model projections of climate and its effects / Consortium: PLUMESFronzek S; Pirttioja N; Carter; T R; Bindi M; Hoffmann H; Palosuo T; RuizRamos M; Tao F; Trnka M; Acutis M; Asseng S; Baranowski P; Basso B; Bodin P; Buis S; Cammarano D; Deligios P; Destain; M F; Dumont B; Ewert F; Ferrise R; Franois L; Gaiser T; Hlavinka P; Jacquemin I; Kersebaum; K C; Kollas C; Krzyszczak J; Lorite; I J; Minet J; Minguez; M I; Montesino M; Moriondo M; Mller C; Nendel C; ztrk I; Perego A; Rodrguez A; Ruane; A C; Ruget F; Sanna M; Semenov; M A; Slawinski C; Stratonovitch P; Supit I; Waha K; Wang E; Wu L; Zhao Z; Rtter; R P;handle: 20.500.14243/411955 , 2434/616106 , 11388/202604 , 2158/1113710
Crop growth simulation models can differ greatly in their treatment of key processes and hence in their response to environmental conditions. Here, we used an ensemble of 26 process-based wheat models applied at sites across a European transect to compare their sensitivity to changes in temperature (-2 to +9°C) and precipitation (-50 to +50%). Model results were analysed by plotting them as impact response surfaces (IRSs), classifying the IRS patterns of individual model simulations, describing these classes and analysing factors that may explain the major differences in model responses.The model ensemble was used to simulate yields of winter and spring wheat at four sites in Finland, Germany and Spain. Results were plotted as IRSs that show changes in yields relative to the baseline with respect to temperature and precipitation. IRSs of 30-year means and selected extreme years were classified using two approaches describing their pattern.The expert diagnostic approach (EDA) combines two aspects of IRS patterns: location of the maximum yield (nine classes) and strength of the yield response with respect to climate (four classes), resulting in a total of 36 combined classes defined using criteria pre-specified by experts. The statistical diagnostic approach (SDA) groups IRSs by comparing their pattern and magnitude, without attempting to interpret these features. It applies a hierarchical clustering method, grouping response patterns using a distance metric that combines the spatial correlation and Euclidian distance between IRS pairs. The two approaches were used to investigate whether different patterns of yield response could be related to different properties of the crop models, specifically their genealogy, calibration and process description.Although no single model property across a large model ensemble was found to explain the integrated yield response to temperature and precipitation perturbations, the application of the EDA and SDA approaches revealed their capability to distinguish: (i) stronger yield responses to precipitation for winter wheat than spring wheat; (ii) differing strengths of response to climate changes for years with anomalous weather conditions compared to period-average conditions; (iii) the influence of site conditions on yield patterns; (iv) similarities in IRS patterns among models with related genealogy; (v) similarities in IRS patterns for models with simpler process descriptions of root growth and water uptake compared to those with more complex descriptions; and (vi) a closer correspondence of IRS patterns in models using partitioning schemes to represent yield formation than in those using a harvest index.Such results can inform future crop modelling studies that seek to exploit the diversity of multi-model ensembles, by distinguishing ensemble members that span a wide range of responses as well as those that display implausible behaviour or strong mutual similarities.
Archivio Istituziona... arrow_drop_down University of Florida: Digital Library CenterArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/LS00592743/00001Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAPublikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2017Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverWageningen Staff PublicationsArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Wageningen Staff PublicationsUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ag...Other literature typeData sources: European Union Open Data PortalInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agsy.2017.08.004&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert Archivio Istituziona... arrow_drop_down University of Florida: Digital Library CenterArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/LS00592743/00001Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAPublikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2017Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverWageningen Staff PublicationsArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Wageningen Staff PublicationsUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ag...Other literature typeData sources: European Union Open Data PortalInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agsy.2017.08.004&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2023Publisher:Wiley Seungdo Kim; Bruce E. Dale; Rafael Martinez‐Feria; Bruno Basso; Kurt Thelen; Christos T. Maravelias; Douglas Landis; Tyler J. Lark; G. Philip Robertson;doi: 10.1111/gcbb.13024
AbstractEnergy crops for biofuel production, especially switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), are of interest from a climate change perspective. Here, we use outputs from a crop growth model and life cycle assessment (LCA) to examine the global warming intensity (GWI; g CO2 MJ−1) and greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential (Mg CO2 year−1) of biofuel systems based on a spatially explicit analysis of switchgrass grown on marginal land (abandoned former cropland) in Michigan, USA. We find that marginal lands in Michigan can annually produce over 0.57 hm3 of liquid biofuel derived from nitrogen‐fertilized switchgrass, mitigating 1.2–1.5 Tg of CO2 year−1. About 96% of these biofuels can meet the Renewable Fuel Standard (60% reduction in lifecycle GHG emissions compared with conventional gasoline; GWI ≤37.2 g CO2 MJ−1). Furthermore, 73%–75% of these biofuels are carbon‐negative (GWI less than zero) due to enhanced soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration. However, simulations indicate that SOC levels would fail to increase and even decrease on the 11% of lands where SOC stocks >>200 Mg C ha−1, leading to carbon intensities greater than gasoline. Results highlight the strong climate mitigation potential of switchgrass grown on marginal lands as well as the needs to avoid carbon rich soils such as histosols and wetlands and to ensure that productivity will be sufficient to provide net mitigation.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.13024&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.13024&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2016Publisher:Resilience Alliance, Inc. Lifeng Luo; Dongchun Ma; Julie A. Winkler; Hua Zheng; Zhiyun Ouyang; Jianguo Liu; Yunkai Li; Xiao Liu; Andrés Viña; Chunmiao Zheng; Chunmiao Zheng; Chunmiao Zheng; Bruno Basso; Frank Lupi; Jillian M. Deines; Guoliang Cao; Meng Qingyi; Shuxin Li; Wu Yang; David W. Hyndman;Les zones urbaines telles que les mégapoles (celles dont la population est supérieure à 10 millions d'habitants) sont des points chauds de l'utilisation mondiale de l'eau et sont donc confrontées à d'intenses défis en matière de gestion de l'eau.Les zones urbaines sont influencées par les interactions locales entre les systèmes humains et naturels et interagissent avec les systèmes distants par le biais des flux d'eau, de nourriture, d'énergie, de personnes, d'information et de capitaux.Toutefois, les analyses de la durabilité de l'eau et de la gestion des flux d'eau dans les zones urbaines sont souvent fragmentées.Il est fortement nécessaire d'appliquer des cadres intégrés pour analyser systématiquement les zones urbaines la dynamique de l'eau et les facteurs qui influencent ces dynamiques.Nous appliquons le cadre du télécouplage (interactions socio-économiques et environnementales sur des distances) pour analyser les problèmes d'eau urbaine, en utilisant Pékin comme mégapole de démonstration.Pékin illustre le défi mondial de la durabilité de l'eau pour les milieux urbains.Comme de nombreuses autres villes, Pékin a connu des réductions drastiques de la quantité et de la qualité des eaux de surface et souterraines au cours des dernières décennies ; il dépend de l'importation d'eau réelle et virtuelle provenant de systèmes d'envoi pour répondre à sa demande d'eau propre et rejette de l'eau polluée dans d'autres systèmes (systèmes de débordement).Le Le cadre intégratif que nous présentons démontre l'importance de prendre en compte les interactions socio-économiques et environnementales entre les systèmes humains et naturels télécouplés, qui comprennent non seulement Pékin (le système de réception de l'eau), mais aussi les systèmes d'envoi d'eau et les systèmes de débordement. Ce cadre aide à intégrer des composantes importantes des interactions locales et lointaines entre l'homme et la nature et intègre un large éventail de couplages et de télécouplages locaux qui affectent la dynamique de l'eau, ce qui génère à son tour des conséquences socio-économiques et environnementales importantes, y compris des effets de rétroaction. L'application du cadre à Pékin révèle de nombreuses lacunes dans la recherche et de nombreux besoins en matière de gestion. Nous fournissons également une base pour appliquer le cadre de télécouplage afin de mieux comprendre et gérer la durabilité de l'eau dans d'autres villes du monde. Las áreas urbanas como las megaciudades (aquellas con poblaciones superiores a 10 millones) son puntos críticos del uso global del agua y, por lo tanto, enfrentan intensos desafíos de gestión del agua. Las áreas urbanas están influenciadas por las interacciones locales entre los sistemas humanos y naturales e interactúan con sistemas distantes a través de flujos de agua, alimentos, energía, personas, información y capital. Sin embargo, los análisis de la sostenibilidad del agua y la gestión de los flujos de agua en las áreas urbanas a menudo están fragmentados. Existe una gran necesidad de aplicar marcos integrados para analizar sistemáticamente la dinámica del agua y factores que influyen en esta dinámica. Aplicamos el marco del teleacoplamiento (interacciones socioeconómicas y ambientales a distancia) para analizar los problemas del agua urbana, utilizando a Beijing como una megaciudad de demostración. Beijing ejemplifica el desafío global de sostenibilidad del agua para los entornos urbanos. Al igual que muchas otras ciudades, Beijing ha experimentado reducciones drásticas en la cantidad y calidad de las aguas superficiales y subterráneas en las últimas décadas; depende de la importación de agua real y virtual de los sistemas de envío para satisfacer su demanda de agua limpia y libera agua contaminada a otros sistemas (sistemas de derrame). El marco integrador que presentamos demuestra la importancia de considerar las interacciones socioeconómicas y ambientales entre los sistemas humanos y naturales teleacoplados, que incluyen no solo Beijing (el sistema de recepción de agua) sino también los sistemas de envío de agua y los sistemas de desbordamiento. Este marco ayuda a integrar componentes importantes de las interacciones locales y distantes entre el ser humano y la naturaleza e incorpora una amplia gama de acoplamientos y teleacoplamientos locales que afectan la dinámica del agua, que a su vez generan importantes consecuencias socioeconómicas y ambientales, incluidos los efectos de retroalimentación. La aplicación del marco a Beijing revela muchas lagunas de investigación y necesidades de gestión. También proporcionamos una base para aplicar el marco de teleacoplamiento para comprender y gestionar mejor la sostenibilidad del agua en otras ciudades del mundo. Urban areas such as megacities (those with populations greater than 10 million) are hotspots of global water use and thus face intense water management challenges.Urban areas are influenced by local interactions between human and natural systems and interact with distant systems through flows of water, food, energy, people, information, and capital.However, analyses of water sustainability and the management of water flows in urban areas are often fragmented.There is a strong need to apply integrated frameworks to systematically analyze urban water dynamics and factors that influence these dynamics.We apply the framework of telecoupling (socioeconomic and environmental interactions over distances) to analyze urban water issues, using Beijing as a demonstration megacity.Beijing exemplifies the global water sustainability challenge for urban settings.Like many other cities, Beijing has experienced drastic reductions in quantity and quality of both surface water and groundwater over the past several decades; it relies on the import of real and virtual water from sending systems to meet its demand for clean water, and releases polluted water to other systems (spillover systems).The integrative framework we present demonstrates the importance of considering socioeconomic and environmental interactions across telecoupled human and natural systems, which include not only Beijing (the water-receiving system) but also water-sending systems and spillover systems.This framework helps integrate important components of local and distant human-nature interactions and incorporates a wide range of local couplings and telecouplings that affect water dynamics, which in turn generate significant socioeconomic and environmental consequences, including feedback effects.The application of the framework to Beijing reveals many research gaps and management needs.We also provide a foundation to apply the telecoupling framework to better understand and manage water sustainability in other cities around the world. المناطق الحضرية مثل المدن الكبرى (تلك التي يزيد عدد سكانها عن 10 ملايين نسمة) هي نقاط ساخنة للاستخدام العالمي للمياه وبالتالي تواجه تحديات مكثفة في إدارة المياه. تتأثر المناطق الحضرية بالتفاعلات المحلية بين النظم البشرية والطبيعية وتتفاعل مع النظم البعيدة من خلال تدفقات المياه والغذاء والطاقة والناس والمعلومات ورأس المال. ومع ذلك، غالبًا ما تكون تحليلات استدامة المياه وإدارة تدفقات المياه في المناطق الحضرية مجزأة. هناك حاجة قوية لتطبيق أطر متكاملة لتحليل المناطق الحضرية بشكل منهجي ديناميكيات المياه والعوامل التي تؤثر على هذه الديناميكيات .نطبق إطار الاقتران عن بعد (التفاعلات الاجتماعية والاقتصادية والبيئية عبر المسافات) لتحليل قضايا المياه في المناطق الحضرية، باستخدام بكين كمدينة ضخمة .تجسد بكين التحدي العالمي لاستدامة المياه في المناطق الحضرية .مثل العديد من المدن الأخرى، شهدت بكين تخفيضات جذرية في كمية ونوعية كل من المياه السطحية والمياه الجوفية على مدى العقود العديدة الماضية ؛ وهي تعتمد على استيراد المياه الحقيقية والافتراضية من أنظمة الإرسال لتلبية طلبها على المياه النظيفة، وتطلق المياه الملوثة إلى أنظمة أخرى (أنظمة غير مباشرة). يوضح الإطار التكاملي الذي نقدمه أهمية النظر في التفاعلات الاجتماعية والاقتصادية والبيئية عبر الأنظمة البشرية والطبيعية المقترنة عن بعد، والتي لا تشمل بكين فقط (نظام استقبال المياه) ولكن أيضًا أنظمة إرسال المياه وأنظمة الامتداد. يساعد هذا الإطار على دمج المكونات المهمة للتفاعلات المحلية والبعيدة بين الطبيعة البشرية ويتضمن مجموعة واسعة من الوصلات المحلية والوصلات عن بعد التي تؤثر على ديناميكيات المياه، والتي بدورها تولد عواقب اجتماعية واقتصادية وبيئية كبيرة، بما في ذلك تأثيرات التغذية الراجعة. يكشف تطبيق الإطار على بكين عن العديد من الثغرات البحثية والاحتياجات الإدارية. كما نوفر أساسًا لتطبيق إطار الاقتران عن بعد لفهم وإدارة استدامة المياه بشكل أفضل في مدن أخرى حول العالم.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5751/es-08685-210404&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5751/es-08685-210404&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euResearch data keyboard_double_arrow_right Dataset 2020Embargo end date: 28 May 2020Publisher:Dryad Authors: Hussain, Mir Zaman; Robertson, G.Philip; Basso, Bruno; Hamilton, Stephen K.;Leaching dataset of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrogen (DON), nitrate (NO3+) and ammonium (NH4+) were collected from 6 cropping treatments (corn, switchgrass, miscanthus, native grass mix, restored prairie and poplar) established in the Bioenergy Cropping System Experiment (BCSE) which is a part of Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (www.glbrc.org) and Long Termn Ecological Research (LTER) program (www.lter.kbs.msu.edu). The site is located at the W.K. Kellogg Biological Station (42.3956° N, 85.3749° W and 288 m above sea level), 25 km from Kalamazoo in southwestern Michigan, USA. Prenart soil water samplers made of Teflon and silica (http://www.prenart.dk/soil-water-samplers/) were installed in blocks 1 and 2 of the BCSE (Fig. S1), and Eijkelkamp soil water samplers made of ceramic (http://www.eijkelkamp.com) were installed in blocks 3 and 4 (there were no soil water samplers in block 5). All samplers were installed at 1.2 m depth at a 45° angle from the soil surface, approximately 20 cm into the unconsolidated sand of the 2Bt2 and 2E/Bt horizons. Beginning in 2009, soil water was sampled at weekly to biweekly intervals during non-frozen periods (April to November) by applying 50 kPa of vacuum for 24 hours, during which water was collected in glass bottles. During the 2009 and 2010 sampling periods we obtained fewer soil water samples from blocks 1 and 2 where Prenart lysimeters were installed. We observed no consistent differences between the two sampler types in concentrations of the analytes reported here. Depending on the volume of leachate collected, water samples were filtered using either 0.45 µm pore size, 33-mm-dia. cellulose acetate membrane filters when volumes were <50 ml, or 0.45 µm, 47-mm-dia. Supor 450 membrane filters for larger volumes. Samples were analyzed for NO3-, NH4+, total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), and DOC. The NO3- concentration was determined using a Dionex ICS1000 ion chromatograph system with membrane suppression and conductivity detection; the detection limit of the system was 0.006 mg NO3--N L-1. The NH4+ concentration in the samples was determined using a Thermo Scientific (formerly Dionex) ICS1100 ion chromatograph system with membrane suppression and conductivity detection; the detection limit of the system was similar. The DOC and TDN concentrations were determined using a Shimadzu TOC-Vcph carbon analyzer with a total nitrogen module (TNM-1); the detection limit of the system was ~0.08 mg C L-1 and ~0.04 mg N L-1. DON concentrations were estimated as the difference between TDN and dissolved inorganic N (NO3- + NH4+) concentrations. The NH4+ concentrations were only measured in the 2013-2015 crop-years, but they were always small relative to NO3- and thus their inclusion or lack of it was inconsequential to the DON estimation. Leaching rates were estimated on a crop-year basis, defined as the period from planting or emergence of the crop in the year indicated through the ensuing year until the next year’s planting or emergence. For each sampling point, the concentration was linearly interpolated between sampling dates during non-freezing periods (April through November). The concentrations in the unsampled winter period (December through March) were also linearly interpolated based on the preceding November and subsequent April samples. Solute leaching (kg ha-1) was calculated by multiplying the daily solute concentration in pore-water (mg L -1) by the modeled daily drainage rates (m3 ha-1) from the overlying soil. The drainage rates were obtained using the SALUS (Systems Approach for Land Use Sustainability) model (Basso and Ritchie, 2015). SALUS simulates yield and environmental outcomes in response to weather, soil, management (planting dates, plant population, irrigation, nitrogen fertilizer application, tillage), and crop genetics. The SALUS water balance sub-model simulates surface run-off, saturated and unsaturated water flow, drainage, root water uptake, and evapotranspiration during growing and non-growing seasons (Basso and Ritchie, 2015). Drainage amounts and rates simulated by SALUS have been validated with measurements using large monolith lysimeters at a nearby site at KBS (Basso and Ritchie, 2005). On days when SALUS predicted no drainage, the leaching was assumed to be zero. The volume-weighted mean concentration for an entire crop-year was calculated as the sum of daily leaching (kg ha-1) divided by the sum of daily drainage rates (m3 ha-1). Weather data for the model were collected at the nearby KBS LTER meteorological station (lter.kbs.msu.edu). Leaching losses of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrogen (DON) from agricultural systems are important to water quality and carbon and nutrient balances but are rarely reported; the few available studies suggest linkages to litter production (DOC) and nitrogen fertilization (DON). In this study we examine the leaching of DOC, DON, NO3-, and NH4+ from no-till corn (maize) and perennial bioenergy crops (switchgrass, miscanthus, native grasses, restored prairie, and poplar) grown between 2009 and 2016 in a replicated field experiment in the upper Midwest U.S. Leaching was estimated from concentrations in soil water and modeled drainage (percolation) rates. DOC leaching rates (kg ha-1 yr-1) and volume-weighted mean concentrations (mg L-1) among cropping systems averaged 15.4 and 4.6, respectively; N fertilization had no effect and poplar lost the most DOC (21.8 and 6.9, respectively). DON leaching rates (kg ha-1 yr-1) and volume-weighted mean concentrations (mg L-1) under corn (the most heavily N-fertilized crop) averaged 4.5 and 1.0, respectively, which was higher than perennial grasses (mean: 1.5 and 0.5, respectively) and poplar (1.6 and 0.5, respectively). NO3- comprised the majority of total N leaching in all systems (59-92%). Average NO3- leaching (kg N ha-1 yr-1) under corn (35.3) was higher than perennial grasses (5.9) and poplar (7.2). NH4+ concentrations in soil water from all cropping systems were relatively low (<0.07 mg N L-1). Perennial crops leached more NO3- in the first few years after planting, and markedly less after. Among the fertilized crops, the leached N represented 14-38% of the added N over the study period; poplar lost the greatest proportion (38%) and corn was intermediate (23%). Requiring only one third or less of the N fertilization compared to corn, perennial bioenergy crops can substantially reduce N leaching and consequent movement into aquifers and surface waters. readme files are given that describe the data table
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.0p2ngf1xb&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.0p2ngf1xb&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2014 France, France, France, Spain, United States, Netherlands, United States, France, GermanyPublisher:Wiley Claas Nendel; Simona Bassu; Nadine Brisson; Marc Corbeels; Eckart Priesack; Katharina Waha; Edmar Teixeira; Delphine Deryng; Jerry L. Hatfield; Iurii Shcherbak; Iurii Shcherbak; Soo-Hyung Kim; Maria Virginia Pravia; Bruno Basso; Bruno Basso; Fulu Tao; Federico Sau; Jean-Louis Durand; R.E.E. Jongschaap; Patricio Grassini; K. Christian Kersebaum; Armen R. Kemanian; Christian Biernath; Alex C. Ruane; Myriam Adam; Naresh S. Kumar; Christian Baron; Sebastian Gayler; Christoph Müller; Cesar Izaurralde; Kenneth J. Boote; Giacomo De Sanctis; James W. Jones; David Makowski; H.L. Boogaard; Dennis Timlin; Steven Hoek; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Sjaak Conijn; Jon I. Lizaso;AbstractPotential consequences of climate change on crop production can be studied using mechanistic crop simulation models. While a broad variety of maize simulation models exist, it is not known whether different models diverge on grain yield responses to changes in climatic factors, or whether they agree in their general trends related to phenology, growth, and yield. With the goal of analyzing the sensitivity of simulated yields to changes in temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations [CO2], we present the largest maize crop model intercomparison to date, including 23 different models. These models were evaluated for four locations representing a wide range of maize production conditions in the world: Lusignan (France), Ames (USA), Rio Verde (Brazil) and Morogoro (Tanzania). While individual models differed considerably in absolute yield simulation at the four sites, an ensemble of a minimum number of models was able to simulate absolute yields accurately at the four sites even with low data for calibration, thus suggesting that using an ensemble of models has merit. Temperature increase had strong negative influence on modeled yield response of roughly −0.5 Mg ha−1 per °C. Doubling [CO2] from 360 to 720 μmol mol−1 increased grain yield by 7.5% on average across models and the sites. That would therefore make temperature the main factor altering maize yields at the end of this century. Furthermore, there was a large uncertainty in the yield response to [CO2] among models. Model responses to temperature and [CO2] did not differ whether models were simulated with low calibration information or, simulated with high level of calibration information.
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAPublication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)Article . 2014Data sources: Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2014Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverGlobal Change BiologyArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefPublication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Eberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.12520&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAPublication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)Article . 2014Data sources: Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2014Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverGlobal Change BiologyArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefPublication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Eberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.12520&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2017 Spain, Germany, United Kingdom, France, France, Finland, Netherlands, France, AustraliaPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:EC | AGREENSKILLSEC| AGREENSKILLSAuthors: Ann-Kristin Koehler; Peter J. Thorburn; Margarita Garcia-Vila; Margarita Garcia-Vila; +62 AuthorsAnn-Kristin Koehler; Peter J. Thorburn; Margarita Garcia-Vila; Margarita Garcia-Vila; L. A. Hunt; L. A. Hunt; Bruce A. Kimball; Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei; Davide Cammarano; Davide Cammarano; Mikhail A. Semenov; Michael J. Ottman; Curtis D. Jones; Frank Ewert; Gerard W. Wall; Garry O'Leary; Pierre Martre; Jordi Doltra; Taru Palosuo; Daniel Wallach; Mohamed Jabloun; Iurii Shcherbak; Iurii Shcherbak; Matthew P. Reynolds; Reimund P. Rötter; Andrew J. Challinor; Andrew J. Challinor; Dominique Ripoche; Bruno Basso; Phillip D. Alderman; Phillip D. Alderman; Jeffrey W. White; Andrea Maiorano; Katharina Waha; Katharina Waha; Jørgen E. Olesen; Senthold Asseng; Pierre Stratonovitch; Zhigan Zhao; Zhigan Zhao; Elias Fereres; Elias Fereres; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Claudio O. Stöckle; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Jakarat Anothai; Jakarat Anothai; Giacomo De Sanctis; Yan Zhu; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Claas Nendel; Thilo Streck; Fulu Tao; Sebastian Gayler; Eckart Priesack; Enli Wang; Zhimin Wang; Iwan Supit; Christian Biernath; Soora Naresh Kumar; Alex C. Ruane; Leilei Liu; Joost Wolf; Christoph Müller; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Gerrit Hoogenboom;Increasing the accuracy of crop productivity estimates is a key element in planning adaptation strategies to ensure global food security under climate change. Process-based crop models are effective means to project climate impact on crop yield, but have large uncertainty in yield simulations. Here, we show that variations in the mathematical functions currently used to simulate temperature responses of physiological processes in 29 wheat models account for >50% of uncertainty in simulated grain yields for mean growing season temperatures from 14 °C to 33 °C. We derived a set of new temperature response functions that when substituted in four wheat models reduced the error in grain yield simulations across seven global sites with different temperature regimes by 19% to 50% (42% average). We anticipate the improved temperature responses to be a key step to improve modelling of crops under rising temperature and climate change, leading to higher skill of crop yield projections.
Nature Plants arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAPublikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2017Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nplants.2017.102&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert Nature Plants arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAPublikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2017Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nplants.2017.102&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020Publisher:Wiley Authors: Rafael Martinez‐Feria; Bruno Basso;doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12726
AbstractThe United States Great Lakes Region (USGLR) is a critical geographic area for future bioenergy production. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) is widely considered a carbon (C)‐neutral or C‐negative bioenergy production system, but projected increases in air temperature and precipitation due to climate change might substantially alter soil organic C (SOC) dynamics and storage in soils. This study examined long‐term SOC changes in switchgrass grown on marginal land in the USGLR under current and projected climate, predicted using a process‐based model (Systems Approach to Land‐Use Sustainability) extensively calibrated with a wealth of plant and soil measurements at nine experimental sites. Simulations indicate that these soils are likely a net C sink under switchgrass (average gain 0.87 Mg C ha−1 year−1), although substantial variation in the rate of SOC accumulation was predicted (range: 0.2–1.3 Mg C ha−1 year−1). Principal component analysis revealed that the predicted intersite variability in SOC sequestration was related in part to differences in climatic characteristics, and to a lesser extent, to heterogeneous soils. Although climate change impacts on switchgrass plant growth were predicted to be small (4%–6% decrease on average), the increased soil respiration was predicted to partially negate SOC accumulations down to 70% below historical rates in the most extreme scenarios. Increasing N fertilizer rate and decreasing harvest intensity both had modest SOC sequestration benefits under projected climate, whereas introducing genotypes better adapted to the longer growing seasons was a much more effective strategy. Best‐performing adaptation scenarios were able to offset >60% of the climate change impacts, leading to SOC sequestration 0.7 Mg C ha−1 year−1 under projected climate. On average, this was 0.3 Mg C ha−1 year−1 more C sequestered than the no adaptation baseline. These findings provide crucial knowledge needed to guide policy and operational management for maximizing SOC sequestration of future bioenergy production on marginal lands in the USGLR.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.12726&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.12726&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2017 United Kingdom, France, Australia, France, France, United Kingdom, France, Switzerland, France, Germany, Italy, Australia, Australia, FrancePublisher:Wiley Funded by:EC | FACCE CSA, SNSF | Robust models for assessi...EC| FACCE CSA ,SNSF| Robust models for assessing the effectiveness of technologies and managements to reduce N2O emissions from grazed pastures (Models4Pastures)Renáta Sándor; Paul C. D. Newton; Ward Smith; Nuala Fitton; Brian Grant; Jean-François Soussana; Joël Léonard; Katja Klumpp; Lutz Merbold; Lutz Merbold; Stephanie K. Jones; Raia Silvia Massad; Luca Doro; Andrew D. Moore; Elizabeth A. Meier; Fiona Ehrhardt; Vasileios Myrgiotis; Russel McAuliffe; Bruno Basso; Sandro José Giacomini; Sylvie Recous; Matthew T. Harrison; Peter Grace; Massimiliano De Antoni Migliorati; Gianni Bellocchi; Patricia Laville; Raphaël Martin; Val Snow; Miko U. F. Kirschbaum; Arti Bhatia; Pete Smith; Lianhai Wu; Qing Zhang; Mark Lieffering; Joanna Sharp; Elizabeth Pattey; Lorenzo Brilli; Mark A. Liebig; Christopher D. Dorich; Jordi Doltra; Susanne Rolinski;AbstractSimulation models are extensively used to predict agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions. However, the uncertainties of (reduced) model ensemble simulations have not been assessed systematically for variables affecting food security and climate change mitigation, within multi‐species agricultural contexts. We report an international model comparison and benchmarking exercise, showing the potential of multi‐model ensembles to predict productivity and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions for wheat, maize, rice and temperate grasslands. Using a multi‐stage modelling protocol, from blind simulations (stage 1) to partial (stages 2–4) and full calibration (stage 5), 24 process‐based biogeochemical models were assessed individually or as an ensemble against long‐term experimental data from four temperate grassland and five arable crop rotation sites spanning four continents. Comparisons were performed by reference to the experimental uncertainties of observed yields and N2O emissions. Results showed that across sites and crop/grassland types, 23%–40% of the uncalibrated individual models were within two standard deviations (SD) of observed yields, while 42 (rice) to 96% (grasslands) of the models were within 1 SD of observed N2O emissions. At stage 1, ensembles formed by the three lowest prediction model errors predicted both yields and N2O emissions within experimental uncertainties for 44% and 33% of the crop and grassland growth cycles, respectively. Partial model calibration (stages 2–4) markedly reduced prediction errors of the full model ensemble E‐median for crop grain yields (from 36% at stage 1 down to 4% on average) and grassland productivity (from 44% to 27%) and to a lesser and more variable extent for N2O emissions. Yield‐scaled N2O emissions (N2O emissions divided by crop yields) were ranked accurately by three‐model ensembles across crop species and field sites. The potential of using process‐based model ensembles to predict jointly productivity and N2O emissions at field scale is discussed.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2018Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/92474Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne: Archives Ouvertes (HAL)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Aberdeen University Research Archive (AURA)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13965&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2018Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/92474Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne: Archives Ouvertes (HAL)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Aberdeen University Research Archive (AURA)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13965&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014 France, Germany, France, United Kingdom, France, France, France, Spain, Finland, United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Davide Cammarano; Davide Cammarano; Matthew P. Reynolds; Fulu Tao; Curtis D. Jones; Bruce A. Kimball; Mikhail A. Semenov; Garry O'Leary; Yan Zhu; David B. Lobell; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Sebastian Gayler; Bruno Basso; Jørgen E. Olesen; Pierre Martre; Pierre Martre; Jordi Doltra; Taru Palosuo; Daniel Wallach; P. V. V. Prasad; Elias Fereres; Frank Ewert; Reimund P. Rötter; Andrew J. Challinor; Andrew J. Challinor; Ann-Kristin Koehler; Pierre Stratonovitch; Thilo Streck; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Joost Wolf; Claudio O. Stöckle; Zhigan Zhao; Zhigan Zhao; Peter J. Thorburn; Iurii Shcherbak; Iwan Supit; Claas Nendel; Christian Biernath; Eckart Priesack; Enli Wang; Christoph Müller; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Mohamed Jabloun; Margarita Garcia-Vila; L. A. Hunt; Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei; S. Naresh Kumar; Jakarat Anothai; Jakarat Anothai; Katharina Waha; G. De Sanctis; G. De Sanctis; Senthold Asseng; Phillip D. Alderman; Jeffrey W. White; Michael J. Ottman; Alex C. Ruane; Gerard W. Wall;doi: 10.1038/nclimate2470
handle: 10261/158875 , 10568/57488 , 10900/64900
Asseng, S. et al. Crop models are essential tools for assessing the threat of climate change to local and global food production1. Present models used to predict wheat grain yield are highly uncertain when simulating how crops respond to temperature2. Here we systematically tested 30 different wheat crop models of the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project against field experiments in which growing season mean temperatures ranged from 15 °C to 32 °C, including experiments with artificial heating. Many models simulated yields well, but were less accurate at higher temperatures. The model ensemble median was consistently more accurate in simulating the crop temperature response than any single model, regardless of the input information used. Extrapolating the model ensemble temperature response indicates that warming is already slowing yield gains at a majority of wheat-growing locations. Global wheat production is estimated to fall by 6% for each °C of further temperature increase and become more variable over space and time. We thank the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project and its leaders C. Rosenzweig from NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Columbia University (USA), J. Jones from University of Florida (USA), J. Hatfield from United States Department of Agriculture (USA) and J. Antle from Oregon State University (USA) for support. We also thank M. Lopez from CIMMYT (Turkey), M. Usman Bashir from University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (Pakistan), S. Soufizadeh from Shahid Beheshti University (Iran), and J. Lorgeou and J-C. Deswarte from ARVALIS—Institut du Végétal (France) for assistance with selecting key locations and quantifying regional crop cultivars, anthesis and maturity dates and R. Raymundo for assistance with GIS. S.A. and D.C. received financial support from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). C.S. was funded through USDA National Institute for Food and Agriculture award 32011-68002-30191. C.M. received financial support from the KULUNDA project (01LL0905L) and the FACCE MACSUR project (031A103B) funded through the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). F.E. received support from the FACCE MACSUR project (031A103B) funded through the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2812ERA115) and E.E.R. was funded through the German Science Foundation (project EW 119/5-1). M.J. and J.E.O. were funded through the FACCE MACSUR project by the Danish Strategic Research Council. K.C.K. and C.N. were funded by the FACCE MACSUR project through the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL). F.T., T.P. and R.P.R. received financial support from FACCE MACSUR project funded through the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MMM); F.T. was also funded through National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41071030). C.B. was funded through the Helmholtz project ‘REKLIM—Regional Climate Change: Causes and Effects’ Topic 9: ‘Climate Change and Air Quality’. M.P.R. and P.D.A. received funding from the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food Security (CCAFS). G.O’L. was funded through the Australian Grains Research and Development Corporation and the Department of Environment and Primary Industries Victoria, Australia. R.C.I. was funded by Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University. E.W. and Z.Z. were funded by CSIRO and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) through the research project ‘Advancing crop yield while reducing the use of water and nitrogen’ and by the CSIRO-MoE PhD Research Program. Peer reviewed
CORE arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2015Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/57488Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAEberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Göttingen Research Online PublicationsArticle . 2017Data sources: Göttingen Research Online PublicationsInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2470&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert CORE arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2015Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/57488Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAEberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Göttingen Research Online PublicationsArticle . 2017Data sources: Göttingen Research Online PublicationsInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2470&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2005 ItalyPublisher:Elsevier BV Authors: SARTORI, LUIGI; Basso B; Bertocco M; Oliviero G.;handle: 11577/2474689 , 11563/1695 , 11563/18038
The conservation of natural resources is the most important key for a sustainable agriculture, especially considering the decreasing conditional subsidies of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU) for the coming years: the lower economic supports oblige farms to increase efficiency to reduce production costs, whilst given the interaction of agricultural activities with environment quality, appropriate natural resources management will be a crucial aspect for farms. The paper examines the efficiency of agricultural production systems and particularly the efficiency of energy use in a 3-yr soya bean, maize and wheat rotation. The study also aimed to analyse the production cost and the role of EU subsidies on farm strategies for important emerging management systems namely conservation farming (CF) and organic farming (OF) systems. Experiments were carried out in NE Italy, on a farm situated near Rovigo. Energy inputs were generally higher in the CF system but counterbalanced by a higher yield (output), while the OF system had generally reduced energy use (due to no chemical inputs) but lower yield. The economic net return was higher for the CF system, but when the economic subsidies from EU were considered, the integrated net return was higher in the OF system for soya bean and wheat.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.03.010&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.03.010&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2018 Denmark, France, Italy, Italy, United Kingdom, Spain, Denmark, France, Italy, Netherlands, Italy, Germany, Netherlands, United States, France, FinlandPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:AKA | Pathways linking uncertai..., MIUR, AKA | Pathways for linking unce... +2 projectsAKA| Pathways linking uncertainties in model projections of climate and its effects / Consortium: PLUMES ,MIUR ,AKA| Pathways for linking uncertainties in model projections of climate and its effects / Consortium: PLUMES ,EC| IMPRESSIONS ,AKA| Pathways for linking uncertainties in model projections of climate and its effects / Consortium: PLUMESFronzek S; Pirttioja N; Carter; T R; Bindi M; Hoffmann H; Palosuo T; RuizRamos M; Tao F; Trnka M; Acutis M; Asseng S; Baranowski P; Basso B; Bodin P; Buis S; Cammarano D; Deligios P; Destain; M F; Dumont B; Ewert F; Ferrise R; Franois L; Gaiser T; Hlavinka P; Jacquemin I; Kersebaum; K C; Kollas C; Krzyszczak J; Lorite; I J; Minet J; Minguez; M I; Montesino M; Moriondo M; Mller C; Nendel C; ztrk I; Perego A; Rodrguez A; Ruane; A C; Ruget F; Sanna M; Semenov; M A; Slawinski C; Stratonovitch P; Supit I; Waha K; Wang E; Wu L; Zhao Z; Rtter; R P;handle: 20.500.14243/411955 , 2434/616106 , 11388/202604 , 2158/1113710
Crop growth simulation models can differ greatly in their treatment of key processes and hence in their response to environmental conditions. Here, we used an ensemble of 26 process-based wheat models applied at sites across a European transect to compare their sensitivity to changes in temperature (-2 to +9°C) and precipitation (-50 to +50%). Model results were analysed by plotting them as impact response surfaces (IRSs), classifying the IRS patterns of individual model simulations, describing these classes and analysing factors that may explain the major differences in model responses.The model ensemble was used to simulate yields of winter and spring wheat at four sites in Finland, Germany and Spain. Results were plotted as IRSs that show changes in yields relative to the baseline with respect to temperature and precipitation. IRSs of 30-year means and selected extreme years were classified using two approaches describing their pattern.The expert diagnostic approach (EDA) combines two aspects of IRS patterns: location of the maximum yield (nine classes) and strength of the yield response with respect to climate (four classes), resulting in a total of 36 combined classes defined using criteria pre-specified by experts. The statistical diagnostic approach (SDA) groups IRSs by comparing their pattern and magnitude, without attempting to interpret these features. It applies a hierarchical clustering method, grouping response patterns using a distance metric that combines the spatial correlation and Euclidian distance between IRS pairs. The two approaches were used to investigate whether different patterns of yield response could be related to different properties of the crop models, specifically their genealogy, calibration and process description.Although no single model property across a large model ensemble was found to explain the integrated yield response to temperature and precipitation perturbations, the application of the EDA and SDA approaches revealed their capability to distinguish: (i) stronger yield responses to precipitation for winter wheat than spring wheat; (ii) differing strengths of response to climate changes for years with anomalous weather conditions compared to period-average conditions; (iii) the influence of site conditions on yield patterns; (iv) similarities in IRS patterns among models with related genealogy; (v) similarities in IRS patterns for models with simpler process descriptions of root growth and water uptake compared to those with more complex descriptions; and (vi) a closer correspondence of IRS patterns in models using partitioning schemes to represent yield formation than in those using a harvest index.Such results can inform future crop modelling studies that seek to exploit the diversity of multi-model ensembles, by distinguishing ensemble members that span a wide range of responses as well as those that display implausible behaviour or strong mutual similarities.
Archivio Istituziona... arrow_drop_down University of Florida: Digital Library CenterArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/LS00592743/00001Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAPublikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2017Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverWageningen Staff PublicationsArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Wageningen Staff PublicationsUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ag...Other literature typeData sources: European Union Open Data PortalInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agsy.2017.08.004&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert Archivio Istituziona... arrow_drop_down University of Florida: Digital Library CenterArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/LS00592743/00001Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAPublikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2017Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverWageningen Staff PublicationsArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Wageningen Staff PublicationsUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ag...Other literature typeData sources: European Union Open Data PortalInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agsy.2017.08.004&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2023Publisher:Wiley Seungdo Kim; Bruce E. Dale; Rafael Martinez‐Feria; Bruno Basso; Kurt Thelen; Christos T. Maravelias; Douglas Landis; Tyler J. Lark; G. Philip Robertson;doi: 10.1111/gcbb.13024
AbstractEnergy crops for biofuel production, especially switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), are of interest from a climate change perspective. Here, we use outputs from a crop growth model and life cycle assessment (LCA) to examine the global warming intensity (GWI; g CO2 MJ−1) and greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential (Mg CO2 year−1) of biofuel systems based on a spatially explicit analysis of switchgrass grown on marginal land (abandoned former cropland) in Michigan, USA. We find that marginal lands in Michigan can annually produce over 0.57 hm3 of liquid biofuel derived from nitrogen‐fertilized switchgrass, mitigating 1.2–1.5 Tg of CO2 year−1. About 96% of these biofuels can meet the Renewable Fuel Standard (60% reduction in lifecycle GHG emissions compared with conventional gasoline; GWI ≤37.2 g CO2 MJ−1). Furthermore, 73%–75% of these biofuels are carbon‐negative (GWI less than zero) due to enhanced soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration. However, simulations indicate that SOC levels would fail to increase and even decrease on the 11% of lands where SOC stocks >>200 Mg C ha−1, leading to carbon intensities greater than gasoline. Results highlight the strong climate mitigation potential of switchgrass grown on marginal lands as well as the needs to avoid carbon rich soils such as histosols and wetlands and to ensure that productivity will be sufficient to provide net mitigation.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.13024&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.13024&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2016Publisher:Resilience Alliance, Inc. Lifeng Luo; Dongchun Ma; Julie A. Winkler; Hua Zheng; Zhiyun Ouyang; Jianguo Liu; Yunkai Li; Xiao Liu; Andrés Viña; Chunmiao Zheng; Chunmiao Zheng; Chunmiao Zheng; Bruno Basso; Frank Lupi; Jillian M. Deines; Guoliang Cao; Meng Qingyi; Shuxin Li; Wu Yang; David W. Hyndman;Les zones urbaines telles que les mégapoles (celles dont la population est supérieure à 10 millions d'habitants) sont des points chauds de l'utilisation mondiale de l'eau et sont donc confrontées à d'intenses défis en matière de gestion de l'eau.Les zones urbaines sont influencées par les interactions locales entre les systèmes humains et naturels et interagissent avec les systèmes distants par le biais des flux d'eau, de nourriture, d'énergie, de personnes, d'information et de capitaux.Toutefois, les analyses de la durabilité de l'eau et de la gestion des flux d'eau dans les zones urbaines sont souvent fragmentées.Il est fortement nécessaire d'appliquer des cadres intégrés pour analyser systématiquement les zones urbaines la dynamique de l'eau et les facteurs qui influencent ces dynamiques.Nous appliquons le cadre du télécouplage (interactions socio-économiques et environnementales sur des distances) pour analyser les problèmes d'eau urbaine, en utilisant Pékin comme mégapole de démonstration.Pékin illustre le défi mondial de la durabilité de l'eau pour les milieux urbains.Comme de nombreuses autres villes, Pékin a connu des réductions drastiques de la quantité et de la qualité des eaux de surface et souterraines au cours des dernières décennies ; il dépend de l'importation d'eau réelle et virtuelle provenant de systèmes d'envoi pour répondre à sa demande d'eau propre et rejette de l'eau polluée dans d'autres systèmes (systèmes de débordement).Le Le cadre intégratif que nous présentons démontre l'importance de prendre en compte les interactions socio-économiques et environnementales entre les systèmes humains et naturels télécouplés, qui comprennent non seulement Pékin (le système de réception de l'eau), mais aussi les systèmes d'envoi d'eau et les systèmes de débordement. Ce cadre aide à intégrer des composantes importantes des interactions locales et lointaines entre l'homme et la nature et intègre un large éventail de couplages et de télécouplages locaux qui affectent la dynamique de l'eau, ce qui génère à son tour des conséquences socio-économiques et environnementales importantes, y compris des effets de rétroaction. L'application du cadre à Pékin révèle de nombreuses lacunes dans la recherche et de nombreux besoins en matière de gestion. Nous fournissons également une base pour appliquer le cadre de télécouplage afin de mieux comprendre et gérer la durabilité de l'eau dans d'autres villes du monde. Las áreas urbanas como las megaciudades (aquellas con poblaciones superiores a 10 millones) son puntos críticos del uso global del agua y, por lo tanto, enfrentan intensos desafíos de gestión del agua. Las áreas urbanas están influenciadas por las interacciones locales entre los sistemas humanos y naturales e interactúan con sistemas distantes a través de flujos de agua, alimentos, energía, personas, información y capital. Sin embargo, los análisis de la sostenibilidad del agua y la gestión de los flujos de agua en las áreas urbanas a menudo están fragmentados. Existe una gran necesidad de aplicar marcos integrados para analizar sistemáticamente la dinámica del agua y factores que influyen en esta dinámica. Aplicamos el marco del teleacoplamiento (interacciones socioeconómicas y ambientales a distancia) para analizar los problemas del agua urbana, utilizando a Beijing como una megaciudad de demostración. Beijing ejemplifica el desafío global de sostenibilidad del agua para los entornos urbanos. Al igual que muchas otras ciudades, Beijing ha experimentado reducciones drásticas en la cantidad y calidad de las aguas superficiales y subterráneas en las últimas décadas; depende de la importación de agua real y virtual de los sistemas de envío para satisfacer su demanda de agua limpia y libera agua contaminada a otros sistemas (sistemas de derrame). El marco integrador que presentamos demuestra la importancia de considerar las interacciones socioeconómicas y ambientales entre los sistemas humanos y naturales teleacoplados, que incluyen no solo Beijing (el sistema de recepción de agua) sino también los sistemas de envío de agua y los sistemas de desbordamiento. Este marco ayuda a integrar componentes importantes de las interacciones locales y distantes entre el ser humano y la naturaleza e incorpora una amplia gama de acoplamientos y teleacoplamientos locales que afectan la dinámica del agua, que a su vez generan importantes consecuencias socioeconómicas y ambientales, incluidos los efectos de retroalimentación. La aplicación del marco a Beijing revela muchas lagunas de investigación y necesidades de gestión. También proporcionamos una base para aplicar el marco de teleacoplamiento para comprender y gestionar mejor la sostenibilidad del agua en otras ciudades del mundo. Urban areas such as megacities (those with populations greater than 10 million) are hotspots of global water use and thus face intense water management challenges.Urban areas are influenced by local interactions between human and natural systems and interact with distant systems through flows of water, food, energy, people, information, and capital.However, analyses of water sustainability and the management of water flows in urban areas are often fragmented.There is a strong need to apply integrated frameworks to systematically analyze urban water dynamics and factors that influence these dynamics.We apply the framework of telecoupling (socioeconomic and environmental interactions over distances) to analyze urban water issues, using Beijing as a demonstration megacity.Beijing exemplifies the global water sustainability challenge for urban settings.Like many other cities, Beijing has experienced drastic reductions in quantity and quality of both surface water and groundwater over the past several decades; it relies on the import of real and virtual water from sending systems to meet its demand for clean water, and releases polluted water to other systems (spillover systems).The integrative framework we present demonstrates the importance of considering socioeconomic and environmental interactions across telecoupled human and natural systems, which include not only Beijing (the water-receiving system) but also water-sending systems and spillover systems.This framework helps integrate important components of local and distant human-nature interactions and incorporates a wide range of local couplings and telecouplings that affect water dynamics, which in turn generate significant socioeconomic and environmental consequences, including feedback effects.The application of the framework to Beijing reveals many research gaps and management needs.We also provide a foundation to apply the telecoupling framework to better understand and manage water sustainability in other cities around the world. المناطق الحضرية مثل المدن الكبرى (تلك التي يزيد عدد سكانها عن 10 ملايين نسمة) هي نقاط ساخنة للاستخدام العالمي للمياه وبالتالي تواجه تحديات مكثفة في إدارة المياه. تتأثر المناطق الحضرية بالتفاعلات المحلية بين النظم البشرية والطبيعية وتتفاعل مع النظم البعيدة من خلال تدفقات المياه والغذاء والطاقة والناس والمعلومات ورأس المال. ومع ذلك، غالبًا ما تكون تحليلات استدامة المياه وإدارة تدفقات المياه في المناطق الحضرية مجزأة. هناك حاجة قوية لتطبيق أطر متكاملة لتحليل المناطق الحضرية بشكل منهجي ديناميكيات المياه والعوامل التي تؤثر على هذه الديناميكيات .نطبق إطار الاقتران عن بعد (التفاعلات الاجتماعية والاقتصادية والبيئية عبر المسافات) لتحليل قضايا المياه في المناطق الحضرية، باستخدام بكين كمدينة ضخمة .تجسد بكين التحدي العالمي لاستدامة المياه في المناطق الحضرية .مثل العديد من المدن الأخرى، شهدت بكين تخفيضات جذرية في كمية ونوعية كل من المياه السطحية والمياه الجوفية على مدى العقود العديدة الماضية ؛ وهي تعتمد على استيراد المياه الحقيقية والافتراضية من أنظمة الإرسال لتلبية طلبها على المياه النظيفة، وتطلق المياه الملوثة إلى أنظمة أخرى (أنظمة غير مباشرة). يوضح الإطار التكاملي الذي نقدمه أهمية النظر في التفاعلات الاجتماعية والاقتصادية والبيئية عبر الأنظمة البشرية والطبيعية المقترنة عن بعد، والتي لا تشمل بكين فقط (نظام استقبال المياه) ولكن أيضًا أنظمة إرسال المياه وأنظمة الامتداد. يساعد هذا الإطار على دمج المكونات المهمة للتفاعلات المحلية والبعيدة بين الطبيعة البشرية ويتضمن مجموعة واسعة من الوصلات المحلية والوصلات عن بعد التي تؤثر على ديناميكيات المياه، والتي بدورها تولد عواقب اجتماعية واقتصادية وبيئية كبيرة، بما في ذلك تأثيرات التغذية الراجعة. يكشف تطبيق الإطار على بكين عن العديد من الثغرات البحثية والاحتياجات الإدارية. كما نوفر أساسًا لتطبيق إطار الاقتران عن بعد لفهم وإدارة استدامة المياه بشكل أفضل في مدن أخرى حول العالم.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5751/es-08685-210404&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5751/es-08685-210404&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euResearch data keyboard_double_arrow_right Dataset 2020Embargo end date: 28 May 2020Publisher:Dryad Authors: Hussain, Mir Zaman; Robertson, G.Philip; Basso, Bruno; Hamilton, Stephen K.;Leaching dataset of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrogen (DON), nitrate (NO3+) and ammonium (NH4+) were collected from 6 cropping treatments (corn, switchgrass, miscanthus, native grass mix, restored prairie and poplar) established in the Bioenergy Cropping System Experiment (BCSE) which is a part of Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (www.glbrc.org) and Long Termn Ecological Research (LTER) program (www.lter.kbs.msu.edu). The site is located at the W.K. Kellogg Biological Station (42.3956° N, 85.3749° W and 288 m above sea level), 25 km from Kalamazoo in southwestern Michigan, USA. Prenart soil water samplers made of Teflon and silica (http://www.prenart.dk/soil-water-samplers/) were installed in blocks 1 and 2 of the BCSE (Fig. S1), and Eijkelkamp soil water samplers made of ceramic (http://www.eijkelkamp.com) were installed in blocks 3 and 4 (there were no soil water samplers in block 5). All samplers were installed at 1.2 m depth at a 45° angle from the soil surface, approximately 20 cm into the unconsolidated sand of the 2Bt2 and 2E/Bt horizons. Beginning in 2009, soil water was sampled at weekly to biweekly intervals during non-frozen periods (April to November) by applying 50 kPa of vacuum for 24 hours, during which water was collected in glass bottles. During the 2009 and 2010 sampling periods we obtained fewer soil water samples from blocks 1 and 2 where Prenart lysimeters were installed. We observed no consistent differences between the two sampler types in concentrations of the analytes reported here. Depending on the volume of leachate collected, water samples were filtered using either 0.45 µm pore size, 33-mm-dia. cellulose acetate membrane filters when volumes were <50 ml, or 0.45 µm, 47-mm-dia. Supor 450 membrane filters for larger volumes. Samples were analyzed for NO3-, NH4+, total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), and DOC. The NO3- concentration was determined using a Dionex ICS1000 ion chromatograph system with membrane suppression and conductivity detection; the detection limit of the system was 0.006 mg NO3--N L-1. The NH4+ concentration in the samples was determined using a Thermo Scientific (formerly Dionex) ICS1100 ion chromatograph system with membrane suppression and conductivity detection; the detection limit of the system was similar. The DOC and TDN concentrations were determined using a Shimadzu TOC-Vcph carbon analyzer with a total nitrogen module (TNM-1); the detection limit of the system was ~0.08 mg C L-1 and ~0.04 mg N L-1. DON concentrations were estimated as the difference between TDN and dissolved inorganic N (NO3- + NH4+) concentrations. The NH4+ concentrations were only measured in the 2013-2015 crop-years, but they were always small relative to NO3- and thus their inclusion or lack of it was inconsequential to the DON estimation. Leaching rates were estimated on a crop-year basis, defined as the period from planting or emergence of the crop in the year indicated through the ensuing year until the next year’s planting or emergence. For each sampling point, the concentration was linearly interpolated between sampling dates during non-freezing periods (April through November). The concentrations in the unsampled winter period (December through March) were also linearly interpolated based on the preceding November and subsequent April samples. Solute leaching (kg ha-1) was calculated by multiplying the daily solute concentration in pore-water (mg L -1) by the modeled daily drainage rates (m3 ha-1) from the overlying soil. The drainage rates were obtained using the SALUS (Systems Approach for Land Use Sustainability) model (Basso and Ritchie, 2015). SALUS simulates yield and environmental outcomes in response to weather, soil, management (planting dates, plant population, irrigation, nitrogen fertilizer application, tillage), and crop genetics. The SALUS water balance sub-model simulates surface run-off, saturated and unsaturated water flow, drainage, root water uptake, and evapotranspiration during growing and non-growing seasons (Basso and Ritchie, 2015). Drainage amounts and rates simulated by SALUS have been validated with measurements using large monolith lysimeters at a nearby site at KBS (Basso and Ritchie, 2005). On days when SALUS predicted no drainage, the leaching was assumed to be zero. The volume-weighted mean concentration for an entire crop-year was calculated as the sum of daily leaching (kg ha-1) divided by the sum of daily drainage rates (m3 ha-1). Weather data for the model were collected at the nearby KBS LTER meteorological station (lter.kbs.msu.edu). Leaching losses of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrogen (DON) from agricultural systems are important to water quality and carbon and nutrient balances but are rarely reported; the few available studies suggest linkages to litter production (DOC) and nitrogen fertilization (DON). In this study we examine the leaching of DOC, DON, NO3-, and NH4+ from no-till corn (maize) and perennial bioenergy crops (switchgrass, miscanthus, native grasses, restored prairie, and poplar) grown between 2009 and 2016 in a replicated field experiment in the upper Midwest U.S. Leaching was estimated from concentrations in soil water and modeled drainage (percolation) rates. DOC leaching rates (kg ha-1 yr-1) and volume-weighted mean concentrations (mg L-1) among cropping systems averaged 15.4 and 4.6, respectively; N fertilization had no effect and poplar lost the most DOC (21.8 and 6.9, respectively). DON leaching rates (kg ha-1 yr-1) and volume-weighted mean concentrations (mg L-1) under corn (the most heavily N-fertilized crop) averaged 4.5 and 1.0, respectively, which was higher than perennial grasses (mean: 1.5 and 0.5, respectively) and poplar (1.6 and 0.5, respectively). NO3- comprised the majority of total N leaching in all systems (59-92%). Average NO3- leaching (kg N ha-1 yr-1) under corn (35.3) was higher than perennial grasses (5.9) and poplar (7.2). NH4+ concentrations in soil water from all cropping systems were relatively low (<0.07 mg N L-1). Perennial crops leached more NO3- in the first few years after planting, and markedly less after. Among the fertilized crops, the leached N represented 14-38% of the added N over the study period; poplar lost the greatest proportion (38%) and corn was intermediate (23%). Requiring only one third or less of the N fertilization compared to corn, perennial bioenergy crops can substantially reduce N leaching and consequent movement into aquifers and surface waters. readme files are given that describe the data table
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.0p2ngf1xb&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5061/dryad.0p2ngf1xb&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2014 France, France, France, Spain, United States, Netherlands, United States, France, GermanyPublisher:Wiley Claas Nendel; Simona Bassu; Nadine Brisson; Marc Corbeels; Eckart Priesack; Katharina Waha; Edmar Teixeira; Delphine Deryng; Jerry L. Hatfield; Iurii Shcherbak; Iurii Shcherbak; Soo-Hyung Kim; Maria Virginia Pravia; Bruno Basso; Bruno Basso; Fulu Tao; Federico Sau; Jean-Louis Durand; R.E.E. Jongschaap; Patricio Grassini; K. Christian Kersebaum; Armen R. Kemanian; Christian Biernath; Alex C. Ruane; Myriam Adam; Naresh S. Kumar; Christian Baron; Sebastian Gayler; Christoph Müller; Cesar Izaurralde; Kenneth J. Boote; Giacomo De Sanctis; James W. Jones; David Makowski; H.L. Boogaard; Dennis Timlin; Steven Hoek; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Sjaak Conijn; Jon I. Lizaso;AbstractPotential consequences of climate change on crop production can be studied using mechanistic crop simulation models. While a broad variety of maize simulation models exist, it is not known whether different models diverge on grain yield responses to changes in climatic factors, or whether they agree in their general trends related to phenology, growth, and yield. With the goal of analyzing the sensitivity of simulated yields to changes in temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations [CO2], we present the largest maize crop model intercomparison to date, including 23 different models. These models were evaluated for four locations representing a wide range of maize production conditions in the world: Lusignan (France), Ames (USA), Rio Verde (Brazil) and Morogoro (Tanzania). While individual models differed considerably in absolute yield simulation at the four sites, an ensemble of a minimum number of models was able to simulate absolute yields accurately at the four sites even with low data for calibration, thus suggesting that using an ensemble of models has merit. Temperature increase had strong negative influence on modeled yield response of roughly −0.5 Mg ha−1 per °C. Doubling [CO2] from 360 to 720 μmol mol−1 increased grain yield by 7.5% on average across models and the sites. That would therefore make temperature the main factor altering maize yields at the end of this century. Furthermore, there was a large uncertainty in the yield response to [CO2] among models. Model responses to temperature and [CO2] did not differ whether models were simulated with low calibration information or, simulated with high level of calibration information.
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAPublication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)Article . 2014Data sources: Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2014Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverGlobal Change BiologyArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefPublication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Eberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.12520&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAPublication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)Article . 2014Data sources: Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2014Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverGlobal Change BiologyArticle . 2014 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefPublication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Eberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2014Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.12520&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2017 Spain, Germany, United Kingdom, France, France, Finland, Netherlands, France, AustraliaPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Funded by:EC | AGREENSKILLSEC| AGREENSKILLSAuthors: Ann-Kristin Koehler; Peter J. Thorburn; Margarita Garcia-Vila; Margarita Garcia-Vila; +62 AuthorsAnn-Kristin Koehler; Peter J. Thorburn; Margarita Garcia-Vila; Margarita Garcia-Vila; L. A. Hunt; L. A. Hunt; Bruce A. Kimball; Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei; Davide Cammarano; Davide Cammarano; Mikhail A. Semenov; Michael J. Ottman; Curtis D. Jones; Frank Ewert; Gerard W. Wall; Garry O'Leary; Pierre Martre; Jordi Doltra; Taru Palosuo; Daniel Wallach; Mohamed Jabloun; Iurii Shcherbak; Iurii Shcherbak; Matthew P. Reynolds; Reimund P. Rötter; Andrew J. Challinor; Andrew J. Challinor; Dominique Ripoche; Bruno Basso; Phillip D. Alderman; Phillip D. Alderman; Jeffrey W. White; Andrea Maiorano; Katharina Waha; Katharina Waha; Jørgen E. Olesen; Senthold Asseng; Pierre Stratonovitch; Zhigan Zhao; Zhigan Zhao; Elias Fereres; Elias Fereres; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Claudio O. Stöckle; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Jakarat Anothai; Jakarat Anothai; Giacomo De Sanctis; Yan Zhu; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Claas Nendel; Thilo Streck; Fulu Tao; Sebastian Gayler; Eckart Priesack; Enli Wang; Zhimin Wang; Iwan Supit; Christian Biernath; Soora Naresh Kumar; Alex C. Ruane; Leilei Liu; Joost Wolf; Christoph Müller; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Gerrit Hoogenboom;Increasing the accuracy of crop productivity estimates is a key element in planning adaptation strategies to ensure global food security under climate change. Process-based crop models are effective means to project climate impact on crop yield, but have large uncertainty in yield simulations. Here, we show that variations in the mathematical functions currently used to simulate temperature responses of physiological processes in 29 wheat models account for >50% of uncertainty in simulated grain yields for mean growing season temperatures from 14 °C to 33 °C. We derived a set of new temperature response functions that when substituted in four wheat models reduced the error in grain yield simulations across seven global sites with different temperature regimes by 19% to 50% (42% average). We anticipate the improved temperature responses to be a key step to improve modelling of crops under rising temperature and climate change, leading to higher skill of crop yield projections.
Nature Plants arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAPublikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2017Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nplants.2017.102&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert Nature Plants arrow_drop_down Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTAPublikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2017Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nplants.2017.102&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020Publisher:Wiley Authors: Rafael Martinez‐Feria; Bruno Basso;doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12726
AbstractThe United States Great Lakes Region (USGLR) is a critical geographic area for future bioenergy production. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) is widely considered a carbon (C)‐neutral or C‐negative bioenergy production system, but projected increases in air temperature and precipitation due to climate change might substantially alter soil organic C (SOC) dynamics and storage in soils. This study examined long‐term SOC changes in switchgrass grown on marginal land in the USGLR under current and projected climate, predicted using a process‐based model (Systems Approach to Land‐Use Sustainability) extensively calibrated with a wealth of plant and soil measurements at nine experimental sites. Simulations indicate that these soils are likely a net C sink under switchgrass (average gain 0.87 Mg C ha−1 year−1), although substantial variation in the rate of SOC accumulation was predicted (range: 0.2–1.3 Mg C ha−1 year−1). Principal component analysis revealed that the predicted intersite variability in SOC sequestration was related in part to differences in climatic characteristics, and to a lesser extent, to heterogeneous soils. Although climate change impacts on switchgrass plant growth were predicted to be small (4%–6% decrease on average), the increased soil respiration was predicted to partially negate SOC accumulations down to 70% below historical rates in the most extreme scenarios. Increasing N fertilizer rate and decreasing harvest intensity both had modest SOC sequestration benefits under projected climate, whereas introducing genotypes better adapted to the longer growing seasons was a much more effective strategy. Best‐performing adaptation scenarios were able to offset >60% of the climate change impacts, leading to SOC sequestration 0.7 Mg C ha−1 year−1 under projected climate. On average, this was 0.3 Mg C ha−1 year−1 more C sequestered than the no adaptation baseline. These findings provide crucial knowledge needed to guide policy and operational management for maximizing SOC sequestration of future bioenergy production on marginal lands in the USGLR.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.12726&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.12726&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2017 United Kingdom, France, Australia, France, France, United Kingdom, France, Switzerland, France, Germany, Italy, Australia, Australia, FrancePublisher:Wiley Funded by:EC | FACCE CSA, SNSF | Robust models for assessi...EC| FACCE CSA ,SNSF| Robust models for assessing the effectiveness of technologies and managements to reduce N2O emissions from grazed pastures (Models4Pastures)Renáta Sándor; Paul C. D. Newton; Ward Smith; Nuala Fitton; Brian Grant; Jean-François Soussana; Joël Léonard; Katja Klumpp; Lutz Merbold; Lutz Merbold; Stephanie K. Jones; Raia Silvia Massad; Luca Doro; Andrew D. Moore; Elizabeth A. Meier; Fiona Ehrhardt; Vasileios Myrgiotis; Russel McAuliffe; Bruno Basso; Sandro José Giacomini; Sylvie Recous; Matthew T. Harrison; Peter Grace; Massimiliano De Antoni Migliorati; Gianni Bellocchi; Patricia Laville; Raphaël Martin; Val Snow; Miko U. F. Kirschbaum; Arti Bhatia; Pete Smith; Lianhai Wu; Qing Zhang; Mark Lieffering; Joanna Sharp; Elizabeth Pattey; Lorenzo Brilli; Mark A. Liebig; Christopher D. Dorich; Jordi Doltra; Susanne Rolinski;AbstractSimulation models are extensively used to predict agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions. However, the uncertainties of (reduced) model ensemble simulations have not been assessed systematically for variables affecting food security and climate change mitigation, within multi‐species agricultural contexts. We report an international model comparison and benchmarking exercise, showing the potential of multi‐model ensembles to predict productivity and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions for wheat, maize, rice and temperate grasslands. Using a multi‐stage modelling protocol, from blind simulations (stage 1) to partial (stages 2–4) and full calibration (stage 5), 24 process‐based biogeochemical models were assessed individually or as an ensemble against long‐term experimental data from four temperate grassland and five arable crop rotation sites spanning four continents. Comparisons were performed by reference to the experimental uncertainties of observed yields and N2O emissions. Results showed that across sites and crop/grassland types, 23%–40% of the uncalibrated individual models were within two standard deviations (SD) of observed yields, while 42 (rice) to 96% (grasslands) of the models were within 1 SD of observed N2O emissions. At stage 1, ensembles formed by the three lowest prediction model errors predicted both yields and N2O emissions within experimental uncertainties for 44% and 33% of the crop and grassland growth cycles, respectively. Partial model calibration (stages 2–4) markedly reduced prediction errors of the full model ensemble E‐median for crop grain yields (from 36% at stage 1 down to 4% on average) and grassland productivity (from 44% to 27%) and to a lesser and more variable extent for N2O emissions. Yield‐scaled N2O emissions (N2O emissions divided by crop yields) were ranked accurately by three‐model ensembles across crop species and field sites. The potential of using process‐based model ensembles to predict jointly productivity and N2O emissions at field scale is discussed.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2018Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/92474Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne: Archives Ouvertes (HAL)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Aberdeen University Research Archive (AURA)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13965&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eumore_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2018Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/92474Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Global Change BiologyArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Queensland University of Technology: QUT ePrintsArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne: Archives Ouvertes (HAL)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Aberdeen University Research Archive (AURA)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Tasmania: UTas ePrintsArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.13965&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu