
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Increasing the kaolinite content of raw clays using particle classification techniques for use as supplementary cementitious materials

Abstract The adoption of blended cements to reduce the carbon footprint has increased significantly over the last decades. Clays containing kaolinite are a promising choice due to their widespread availability. Kaolinite content is the major factor controlling the performance of blended cements incorporating calcined clay, for example in LC3-50 (50% clinker, 30% calcined clay, 15% limestone and 5% gypsum) clays with a kaolinite above about 40% are needed to achieve similar strength to reference OPCs at 7 days. Materials with low contents of kalinite are often considered unsuitable. This study compares two fractionation techniques to increase the kaolinite content of a low-grade clay (30% kaolinite content). The results show that kaolinite remains concentrated in the fine particles after grinding. Both wet sedimentation and air separation were effective to increase the reactivity of the material as a combined result of increased fineness and kaolinite content. For the air separation process, it was observed that a significant amount of kaolinite remained in the rejected fraction after processing due to agglomeration of the powder. It was shown that the use of grinding aids before the separation process can further improve the results.
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne EPFL Switzerland
cement, metakaolin, pozzolan, grinding aids, sustainability
cement, metakaolin, pozzolan, grinding aids, sustainability
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).39 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
