
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Unraveling Trade‐Offs Among Reforestation, Urbanization, and Food Security in the South China Karst Region: How Can a Hinterland Province Achieve SDGs?

handle: 10871/132007
AbstractWhether the world can achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) largely depends on the ability of less‐developed areas to cope with multiple socio‐economic changes. The challenges that hinterland areas would face during the realization of SDGs has not yet received enough attentions. In this study, a context‐based assessment of regional food balances was conducted, considering key challenges related to socio‐economic development as well as land use competition under the framework of the shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) and the implementation of reforestation. We examined one of the poorest hinterland provinces in China as a case study, projecting its food deficit and exploring the potential threats to and opportunities for SDG realization by 2030, including population growth, urbanization, urban land expansion and reforestation. The projections revealed a crop deficit of 4.9–9.8 million tonnes, corresponding to the food demands of 10.2–20.6 million people. Approximately 76%–81% of this deficit was expected to be caused by increased food demand, rather than reforestation policies. Therefore, for this less‐developed area with low agricultural productivity and large groups of vulnerable people, population growth and urbanization are likely to result in demands for food that cannot be met locally. In addition, large‐scale reforestation projects, while enhancing a number of key ecosystem services, will increase the local food deficit by promoting the abandonment of cropland. This will result in greater reliance on food imports, with potential impacts on SDG realization in other regions. These findings highlight the need for integrated governance across multiple scales to ensure hinterland sustainability.
- Beijing Normal University China (People's Republic of)
- University of Exeter United Kingdom
- Peking University China (People's Republic of)
- University of Liège Belgium
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology China (People's Republic of)
Sustainable Diets and Environmental Impact, 330, Economics, Population, urbanization impacts, Natural resource economics, Sociology, Sustainable development, reforestation impacts, GE1-350, Business, Sustainable Diets, shared socioeconomic pathways, Reforestation, Biology, QH540-549.5, Economic growth, Environmental planning, Demography, 360, Global and Planetary Change, sustainable development, Global Analysis of Ecosystem Services and Land Use, Ecology, Geography, Urbanization, Agriculture, Forestry, food security, Food security, FOS: Sociology, Environmental sciences, Sustainability, Archaeology, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Drivers and Impacts of Tropical Deforestation
Sustainable Diets and Environmental Impact, 330, Economics, Population, urbanization impacts, Natural resource economics, Sociology, Sustainable development, reforestation impacts, GE1-350, Business, Sustainable Diets, shared socioeconomic pathways, Reforestation, Biology, QH540-549.5, Economic growth, Environmental planning, Demography, 360, Global and Planetary Change, sustainable development, Global Analysis of Ecosystem Services and Land Use, Ecology, Geography, Urbanization, Agriculture, Forestry, food security, Food security, FOS: Sociology, Environmental sciences, Sustainability, Archaeology, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Drivers and Impacts of Tropical Deforestation
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).7 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
