

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Magnitude, Trends, and Variability of the Global Ocean Carbon Sink From 1985 to 2018

AbstractThis contribution to the RECCAP2 (REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes) assessment analyzes the processes that determine the global ocean carbon sink, and its trends and variability over the period 1985–2018, using a combination of models and observation‐based products. The mean sea‐air CO2 flux from 1985 to 2018 is −1.6 ± 0.2 PgC yr−1 based on an ensemble of reconstructions of the history of sea surface pCO2 (pCO2 products). Models indicate that the dominant component of this flux is the net oceanic uptake of anthropogenic CO2, which is estimated at −2.1 ± 0.3 PgC yr−1 by an ensemble of ocean biogeochemical models, and −2.4 ± 0.1 PgC yr−1 by two ocean circulation inverse models. The ocean also degasses about 0.65 ± 0.3 PgC yr−1 of terrestrially derived CO2, but this process is not fully resolved by any of the models used here. From 2001 to 2018, the pCO2 products reconstruct a trend in the ocean carbon sink of −0.61 ± 0.12 PgC yr−1 decade−1, while biogeochemical models and inverse models diagnose an anthropogenic CO2‐driven trend of −0.34 ± 0.06 and −0.41 ± 0.03 PgC yr−1 decade−1, respectively. This implies a climate‐forced acceleration of the ocean carbon sink in recent decades, but there are still large uncertainties on the magnitude and cause of this trend. The interannual to decadal variability of the global carbon sink is mainly driven by climate variability, with the climate‐driven variability exceeding the CO2‐forced variability by 2–3 times. These results suggest that anthropogenic CO2 dominates the ocean CO2 sink, while climate‐driven variability is potentially large but highly uncertain and not consistently captured across different methods.
- University of Colorado System United States
- Pusan National University Korea (Republic of)
- Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory United States
- Princeton University United States
- University of California System United States
[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, 550, Atmosphere, 530 Physics, [SDU.OCEAN] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, 551, ocean, [SDU.ENVI] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment, [SDU] Sciences of the Universe [physics], climate change, [SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics], anthropogenic carbon, carbon cycle, RECCAP2, [SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment, 550 Earth sciences & geology, ocean; carbon cycle; RECCAP2; climate change; anthropogenic carbon
[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, 550, Atmosphere, 530 Physics, [SDU.OCEAN] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, 551, ocean, [SDU.ENVI] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment, [SDU] Sciences of the Universe [physics], climate change, [SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics], anthropogenic carbon, carbon cycle, RECCAP2, [SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment, 550 Earth sciences & geology, ocean; carbon cycle; RECCAP2; climate change; anthropogenic carbon
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).32 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% visibility views 62 download downloads 163 - 62views163downloads
Data source Views Downloads DIGITAL.CSIC 62 163


