
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are increasingly being used globally to conserve marine resources. However, whether many MPAs are being effectively and equitably managed, and how MPA management influences substantive outcomes remain unknown. We developed a global database of management and fish population data (433 and 218 MPAs, respectively) to assess: MPA management processes; the effects of MPAs on fish populations; and relationships between management processes and ecological effects. Here we report that many MPAs failed to meet thresholds for effective and equitable management processes, with widespread shortfalls in staff and financial resources. Although 71% of MPAs positively influenced fish populations, these conservation impacts were highly variable. Staff and budget capacity were the strongest predictors of conservation impact: MPAs with adequate staff capacity had ecological effects 2.9 times greater than MPAs with inadequate capacity. Thus, continued global expansion of MPAs without adequate investment in human and financial capacity is likely to lead to sub-optimal conservation outcomes.
- University of Queensland Australia
- University of Maryland, Baltimore United States
- Duke University United States
- Kobe University Japan
- University of Oxford United Kingdom
570, Aquatic Organisms, Conservation of Natural Resources, Internationality, Science, Population Dynamics, Reserves, environmental impact, 333, decision making, Animals, Biomass, Multidisciplinary, Science & Technology, Ecology, Social-Ecological Systems, Fishes, sustainability, Management, Multidisciplinary Sciences, 1000 General, Workforce, Science & Technology - Other Topics, Goals
570, Aquatic Organisms, Conservation of Natural Resources, Internationality, Science, Population Dynamics, Reserves, environmental impact, 333, decision making, Animals, Biomass, Multidisciplinary, Science & Technology, Ecology, Social-Ecological Systems, Fishes, sustainability, Management, Multidisciplinary Sciences, 1000 General, Workforce, Science & Technology - Other Topics, Goals
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).704 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1%
