
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Soil fertility and species traits, but not diversity, drive productivity and biomass stocks in a Guyanese tropical rainforest

Abstract Tropical forests store and sequester large amounts of carbon in above‐ and below‐ground plant biomass and soil organic matter (SOM), but how these are driven by abiotic and biotic factors remains poorly understood. Here, we test the effects of abiotic factors (light variation, caused by logging disturbance, and soil fertility) and biotic factors (species richness and functional trait composition) on biomass stocks (above‐ground biomass, fine root biomass), SOM and productivity in a relatively monodominant Guyanese tropical rainforest. This forest grows on nutrient‐poor soils and has few species that contribute most to total abundance. We, therefore, expected strong effects of soil fertility and species’ traits that determine resource acquisition and conservation, but not of diversity. We evaluated 6 years of data for 30 0.4‐ha plots and tested hypotheses using structural equation models. Disturbance increased productivity but decreased above‐ground biomass stocks. Soil phosphorus (P) enhanced above‐ground biomass and productivity, whereas soil nitrogen reduced fine root biomass. In contrast to expectations, trait values representing acquisitive strategies (e.g. high leaf nutrient concentration) increased biomass stocks, possibly because they indicate higher nutrient absorption and thus higher biomass build‐up. However, under harsh conditions where biomass increase is slow, acquisitive trait values may increase respiration and vulnerability to hazards and therefore increase biomass loss. As expected, species richness did not affect productivity. We conclude that light availability (through disturbance) and soil fertility—especially P—strongly limit forest biomass productivity and stocks in this Guyanese forest. Low P availability may cause strong environmental filtering, which in turn results in a small set of dominant species. As a result, community trait composition but not species richness determines productivity and stocks of biomass and SOM in tropical forest on poor soils. A plain language summary is available for this article.
Chair Soil Chemistry and Chemical Soil Quality, Bodemscheikunde en Chemische Bodemkwaliteit, fine root biomass, Bos- en Landschapsecologie, Leerstoelgroep Bosecologie en bosbeheer, diversity, soil organic matter, forest and landscape ecology, Alterra - Vegetation, Alterra - Vegetatie, Bosecologie en Bosbeheer, Forest and Landscape Ecology, functional traits, Vegetatie, biodiversity–ecosystem functioning, WIMEK, Vegetation, biomass, soil fertility, PE&RC, Forest Ecology and Forest Management, logging disturbance, niche complementarity, mass-ratio hypothesis, Soil Chemistry and Chemical Soil Quality, bos- en landschapsecologie
Chair Soil Chemistry and Chemical Soil Quality, Bodemscheikunde en Chemische Bodemkwaliteit, fine root biomass, Bos- en Landschapsecologie, Leerstoelgroep Bosecologie en bosbeheer, diversity, soil organic matter, forest and landscape ecology, Alterra - Vegetation, Alterra - Vegetatie, Bosecologie en Bosbeheer, Forest and Landscape Ecology, functional traits, Vegetatie, biodiversity–ecosystem functioning, WIMEK, Vegetation, biomass, soil fertility, PE&RC, Forest Ecology and Forest Management, logging disturbance, niche complementarity, mass-ratio hypothesis, Soil Chemistry and Chemical Soil Quality, bos- en landschapsecologie
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).105 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
