
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Principles of environmentally‐sustainable anaesthesia: a global consensus statement from the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists

SummaryThe Earth’s mean surface temperature is already approximately 1.1°C higher than pre‐industrial levels. Exceeding a mean 1.5°C rise by 2050 will make global adaptation to the consequences of climate change less possible. To protect public health, anaesthesia providers need to reduce the contribution their practice makes to global warming. We convened a Working Group of 45 anaesthesia providers with a recognised interest in sustainability, and used a three‐stage modified Delphi consensus process to agree on principles of environmentally sustainable anaesthesia that are achievable worldwide. The Working Group agreed on the following three important underlying statements: patient safety should not be compromised by sustainable anaesthetic practices; high‐, middle‐ and low‐income countries should support each other appropriately in delivering sustainable healthcare (including anaesthesia); and healthcare systems should be mandated to reduce their contribution to global warming. We set out seven fundamental principles to guide anaesthesia providers in the move to environmentally sustainable practice, including: choice of medications and equipment; minimising waste and overuse of resources; and addressing environmental sustainability in anaesthetists’ education, research, quality improvement and local healthcare leadership activities. These changes are achievable with minimal material resource and financial investment, and should undergo re‐evaluation and updates as better evidence is published. This paper discusses each principle individually, and directs readers towards further important references.
- University of Melbourne Australia
- Newcastle University United Kingdom
- Royal Victoria Infirmary United Kingdom
- PSL Research University France
- Wythenshawe Hospital United Kingdom
690, Delphi Technique, Consensus Development Conferences as Topic, Clinical Sciences, 610, Guidelines, Global Health, Global Warming, 333, Anesthesiology, Medical, Humans, Anesthesia, Societies, Medical, representing the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists Global Working Group on Environmental Sustainability in Anaesthesia, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, carbon, Neurosciences, anaesthesia, Environmental Exposure, sustainability, Anesthesiologists, Climate Action, climate change, Scotland, consensus, Dentistry, anaesthesia; carbon; climate change; consensus; environment; sustainability, Generic health relevance, Societies, environment, Responsible Consumption and Production
690, Delphi Technique, Consensus Development Conferences as Topic, Clinical Sciences, 610, Guidelines, Global Health, Global Warming, 333, Anesthesiology, Medical, Humans, Anesthesia, Societies, Medical, representing the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists Global Working Group on Environmental Sustainability in Anaesthesia, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, carbon, Neurosciences, anaesthesia, Environmental Exposure, sustainability, Anesthesiologists, Climate Action, climate change, Scotland, consensus, Dentistry, anaesthesia; carbon; climate change; consensus; environment; sustainability, Generic health relevance, Societies, environment, Responsible Consumption and Production
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).112 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
