
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Sustainable grassland systems: a modelling perspective based on the North Wyke Farm Platform

pmid: 27867312
pmc: PMC5108350
Sustainable grassland systems: a modelling perspective based on the North Wyke Farm Platform
SummaryThe North Wyke Farm Platform (NWFP) provides data from the field‐ to the farm‐scale, enabling the research community to address key issues in sustainable agriculture better and to test models that are capable of simulating soil, plant and animal processes involved in the systems. The tested models can then be used to simulate how agro‐ecosystems will respond to changes in the environment and management. In this study, we used baseline datasets generated from the NWFP to validate the Soil‐Plant‐Atmosphere Continuum System (SPACSYS) model in relation to the dynamics of soil water content, water loss from runoff and forage biomass removal. The validated model, together with future climate scenarios for the 2020s, 2050s and 2080s (from the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES): medium (A1B) and large (A1F1) emission scenarios), were used to simulate the long‐term responses of the system with three contrasting treatments on the NWFP. Simulation results demonstrated that the SPACSYS model could estimate reliably the dynamics of soil water content, water loss from runoff and drainage, and cut biomass for a permanent sward. The treatments responded in different ways under the climate change scenarios. More carbon (C) is fixed and respired by the swards treated with an increased use of legumes, whereas less C was lost through soil respiration with the planned reseeding. The deep‐rooting grass in the reseeding treatment reduced N losses through leaching, runoff and gaseous emissions, and water loss from runoff compared with the other two treatments.
- Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning China (People's Republic of)
- Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences China (People's Republic of)
- Rothamsted Research United Kingdom
- Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning CAAS China (People's Republic of)
- Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences China (People's Republic of)
Biomass (ecology), Biogeochemical Cycling of Nutrients in Aquatic Ecosystems, Ecosystem Resilience, Soil Science, Carbon Dynamics in Peatland Ecosystems, Environmental science, Leaching (pedology), Special section: Farm‐scale experiments, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Engineering, Soil water, Environmental Chemistry, Climate change, Biology, Ecosystem, Soil science, Ecology, Forage, Nutrient Cycling, Life Sciences, Agriculture, Hydrology (agriculture), Grassland, Surface runoff, Soil carbon, Perennial plant, Agronomy, Geotechnical engineering, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Soil Carbon Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystems, Ecosystem Functioning
Biomass (ecology), Biogeochemical Cycling of Nutrients in Aquatic Ecosystems, Ecosystem Resilience, Soil Science, Carbon Dynamics in Peatland Ecosystems, Environmental science, Leaching (pedology), Special section: Farm‐scale experiments, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Engineering, Soil water, Environmental Chemistry, Climate change, Biology, Ecosystem, Soil science, Ecology, Forage, Nutrient Cycling, Life Sciences, Agriculture, Hydrology (agriculture), Grassland, Surface runoff, Soil carbon, Perennial plant, Agronomy, Geotechnical engineering, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Soil Carbon Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystems, Ecosystem Functioning
7 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).19 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
