

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Interventions for sustained healthcare professional behaviour change: a protocol for an overview of reviews

pmid: 27737704
pmc: PMC5064791
Failure to successfully implement and sustain change over the long term continues to be a major problem in health and social care. Translating evidence into routine clinical practice is notoriously complex, and it is recognised that to implement new evidence-based interventions and sustain them over time, professional behaviour needs to change accordingly. A number of theories and frameworks have been developed to support behaviour change among health and social care professionals, and models of sustainability are emerging, but few have translated into valid and reliable interventions. The long-term success of healthcare professional behavioural change interventions is variable, and the characteristics of successful interventions unclear. Previous reviews have synthesised the evidence for behaviour change, but none have focused on sustainability. In addition, multiple overlapping reviews have reported inconsistent results, which do not aid translation of evidence into practice. Overviews of reviews can provide accessible succinct summaries of evidence and address barriers to evidence-based practice. We aim to compile an overview of reviews, identifying, appraising and synthesising evidence relating to sustained social and healthcare professional behaviour change.We will conduct a systematic review of Cochrane reviews (an Overview). We plan to systematically search the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. We will include all systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials comparing a healthcare professional targeted behaviour change intervention to a standard care or no intervention control group. Two reviewers will independently assess the eligibility of the reviews and the methodological quality of included reviews using the ROBIS tool. The quality of evidence within each comparison in each review will be judged based on the GRADE criteria. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion. Effects of interventions will be systematically tabulated and the quality of evidence used to determine implications for clinical practice and make recommendations for future research.This overview will bring together the best available evidence relating to the sustainability of health professional behaviour change, thus supporting policy makers with decision-making in this field.
- University of Dundee United Kingdom
- Université Laval Canada
- University of Dundee United Kingdom
- University of Ottawa Canada
- University of Stirling United Kingdom
RT Nursing, Attitude of Health Personnel, Health Personnel, Overview, Decision Making, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Professional behaviour change, Interventions, 360, Public health, Wellbeing, Healthcare, Professional Practice, 610.7 Medical education, research & nursing, Sustainability, Health, Evidence-Based Practice, Overview, sustainability, professional behaviour change, Interventions, Healthcare, Systematic Reviews as Topic
RT Nursing, Attitude of Health Personnel, Health Personnel, Overview, Decision Making, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Professional behaviour change, Interventions, 360, Public health, Wellbeing, Healthcare, Professional Practice, 610.7 Medical education, research & nursing, Sustainability, Health, Evidence-Based Practice, Overview, sustainability, professional behaviour change, Interventions, Healthcare, Systematic Reviews as Topic
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).14 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average download downloads 35 - 35downloads
Data source Views Downloads STORRE: Stirling Online Research Repository 0 35

