
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Comparison of Marine Spatial Planning Methods in Madagascar Demonstrates Value of Alternative Approaches

The Government of Madagascar plans to increase marine protected area coverage by over one million hectares. To assist this process, we compare four methods for marine spatial planning of Madagascar's west coast. Input data for each method was drawn from the same variables: fishing pressure, exposure to climate change, and biodiversity (habitats, species distributions, biological richness, and biodiversity value). The first method compares visual color classifications of primary variables, the second uses binary combinations of these variables to produce a categorical classification of management actions, the third is a target-based optimization using Marxan, and the fourth is conservation ranking with Zonation. We present results from each method, and compare the latter three approaches for spatial coverage, biodiversity representation, fishing cost and persistence probability. All results included large areas in the north, central, and southern parts of western Madagascar. Achieving 30% representation targets with Marxan required twice the fish catch loss than the categorical method. The categorical classification and Zonation do not consider targets for conservation features. However, when we reduced Marxan targets to 16.3%, matching the representation level of the "strict protection" class of the categorical result, the methods show similar catch losses. The management category portfolio has complete coverage, and presents several management recommendations including strict protection. Zonation produces rapid conservation rankings across large, diverse datasets. Marxan is useful for identifying strict protected areas that meet representation targets, and minimize exposure probabilities for conservation features at low economic cost. We show that methods based on Zonation and a simple combination of variables can produce results comparable to Marxan for species representation and catch losses, demonstrating the value of comparing alternative approaches during initial stages of the planning process. Choosing an appropriate approach ultimately depends on scientific and political factors including representation targets, likelihood of adoption, and persistence goals.
- University of British Columbia Canada
- University of California, Berkeley United States
- University of California System United States
- Public Library of Science United States
- Public Library of Science United Kingdom
570, Conservation of Natural Resources, 330, Life on Land, General Science & Technology, [SHS.GEO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Geography, Science, Climate Change, Marine Biology, 333, [ SHS.GEO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Geography, [SDE.ES] Environmental Sciences/Environment and Society, Madagascar, Methods, Animals, Life Below Water, International and Comparative Law, Q, R, Fishes, Law and Legal Studies, [SHS.GEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Geography, Biodiversity, Biological Sciences, [SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society, Environmental Management, Ecological Applications, Medicine, Environmental Sciences, Research Article
570, Conservation of Natural Resources, 330, Life on Land, General Science & Technology, [SHS.GEO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Geography, Science, Climate Change, Marine Biology, 333, [ SHS.GEO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Geography, [SDE.ES] Environmental Sciences/Environment and Society, Madagascar, Methods, Animals, Life Below Water, International and Comparative Law, Q, R, Fishes, Law and Legal Studies, [SHS.GEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Geography, Biodiversity, Biological Sciences, [SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society, Environmental Management, Ecological Applications, Medicine, Environmental Sciences, Research Article
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).52 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
