
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Can Joint Carbon and Biodiversity Management in Tropical Agroforestry Landscapes Be Optimized?

pmid: 23077569
pmc: PMC3471943
Can Joint Carbon and Biodiversity Management in Tropical Agroforestry Landscapes Be Optimized?
Managing ecosystems for carbon storage may also benefit biodiversity conservation, but such a potential 'win-win' scenario has not yet been assessed for tropical agroforestry landscapes. We measured above- and below-ground carbon stocks as well as the species richness of four groups of plants and eight of animals on 14 representative plots in Sulawesi, Indonesia, ranging from natural rainforest to cacao agroforests that have replaced former natural forest. The conversion of natural forests with carbon stocks of 227-362 Mg C ha(-1) to agroforests with 82-211 Mg C ha(-1) showed no relationships to overall biodiversity but led to a significant loss of forest-related species richness. We conclude that the conservation of the forest-related biodiversity, and to a lesser degree of carbon stocks, mainly depends on the preservation of natural forest habitats. In the three most carbon-rich agroforestry systems, carbon stocks were about 60% of those of natural forest, suggesting that 1.6 ha of optimally managed agroforest can contribute to the conservation of carbon stocks as much as 1 ha of natural forest. However, agroforestry systems had comparatively low biodiversity, and we found no evidence for a tight link between carbon storage and biodiversity. Yet, potential win-win agroforestry management solutions include combining high shade-tree quality which favours biodiversity with cacao-yield adapted shade levels.
- Bogor Agricultural University Indonesia
- University of Göttingen Germany
- University of Rostock Germany
- Justus Liebig University Giessen Germany
- Tadulako University Indonesia
Conservation of Natural Resources, 570, Science, 580 Plants (Botany), Trees, Soil, Animals, Biomass, SDG 2 – Kein Hunger, 106001 Allgemeine Biologie, SDG 2 - Zero Hunger, Cacao, Tropical Climate, Q, R, Forestry, Biodiversity, Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Carbon, 106001 General biology, Indonesia, Medicine, ddc:570, biodiversity; carbon stocks, Biologie, Research Article
Conservation of Natural Resources, 570, Science, 580 Plants (Botany), Trees, Soil, Animals, Biomass, SDG 2 – Kein Hunger, 106001 Allgemeine Biologie, SDG 2 - Zero Hunger, Cacao, Tropical Climate, Q, R, Forestry, Biodiversity, Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Carbon, 106001 General biology, Indonesia, Medicine, ddc:570, biodiversity; carbon stocks, Biologie, Research Article
2 Research products, page 1 of 1
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).49 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
