
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Primary Cooking Fuel Choice and Respiratory Health Outcomes among Women in Charge of Household Cooking in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: Cross-Sectional Study

pmid: 30909455
pmc: PMC6466344
Background: Approximately 3 billion people, worldwide, rely primarily on biomass for cooking. This study aimed to investigate the association between respiratory symptoms among women in charge of household cooking and the type of fuel used for cooking. Methods: A community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted. A total of 1705 women that were randomly selected, completed the survey. We also performed a bivariate and a multivariate analysis to verify the possible associations between respiratory symptoms in women in charge of household cooking and the type of cooking fuel used. Results: Dry cough, breathing difficulties, and throat irritation frequencies were statistically high in biomass fuel users when compared to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) users. It was also the case for some chronic respiratory symptoms, such as sputum production, shortness of breath, wheezing, wheezing with dyspnea, wheezing without a cold, waking up with shortness of breath, waking up with coughing attacks, and waking up with breathing difficulty. After adjustment for the respondents’ and households’ characteristics; dry cough, breathing difficulties, sneezing, nose tingling, throat irritation, chronic sputum production, wheezing, wheezing with dyspnea, wheezing without a cold, waking up with shortness of breath, waking up with coughing attacks, and waking up with breathing difficulty were symptoms that remained associated to biomass fuel compared to LPG. Women who used charcoal reported the highest proportion of all the chronic respiratory symptoms compared to the firewood users. However, this difference was not statistically significant except for the wheezing, waking up with coughing attacks, and waking up with breath difficulty, after adjustment. Conclusion: Exposure to biomass smoke is responsible for respiratory health problems in women. Charcoal, which is often considered as a clean fuel compared to other biomass fuels and often recommended as an alternative to firewood, also presents health risks, including increased respiratory morbidity in women. Effective and efficient energy policies are needed to accelerate the transition to clean and sustainable energies.
- Yahoo! United States
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Yalgado Ouédraogo Burkina Faso
- Université Libre de Bruxelles
- Université Libre de Bruxeles
- Free University of Brussels (ULB) Belgium
Adult, respiratory health, Respiratory System, Santé publique, Respiratory System -- physiopathology, Cooking fuel, Article, Young Adult, Air Pollution, Smoke, Burkina Faso, Humans, Women, Indoor, Biomass, Cooking, Respiratory Sounds, Family Characteristics, Mutagenèse et technologie génétique, biomass, cooking fuel, Respiratory health, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dyspnea, Cough, Air Pollution, Indoor, Female, women
Adult, respiratory health, Respiratory System, Santé publique, Respiratory System -- physiopathology, Cooking fuel, Article, Young Adult, Air Pollution, Smoke, Burkina Faso, Humans, Women, Indoor, Biomass, Cooking, Respiratory Sounds, Family Characteristics, Mutagenèse et technologie génétique, biomass, cooking fuel, Respiratory health, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dyspnea, Cough, Air Pollution, Indoor, Female, women
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).23 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
