Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Open Data LMUarrow_drop_down
Open Data LMU
Journal . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The Good Muck: Toward an Excremental History of China

RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society 2017, no. 5: The Good Muck: Toward an Excremental History of China
Authors: Worster, Donald;

The Good Muck: Toward an Excremental History of China

Abstract

Why is the Chinese practice of using human body wastes as agricultural fertilizer so fascinating to Westerners? What, if anything, can the Chinese history of putting human waste to good agricultural use offer in response to modern ecological problems? In exploring these questions, this detailed monograph looks both at the history of the use of human excrement as fertilizer in China, and at the Westerners who have taken an interest in this practice. In confronting the actual history of excrement recycling in agriculture and its many interpretations, Worster challenges those who reject such practices as “backwards” or “disgusting,” as well as those who conjure up romanticized notions of peasants living in harmony with nature by reusing their natural wastes to create abundance on the land. Instead, this volume interrogates the ecological aspects and the human cost of excrement recycling, offering a clear-sighted history of the role of human “muck” in human civilization.

Country
Germany
Related Organizations
Keywords

fertilizers, population, overpopulation, waste, ecology, environmental knowledge, resources, sustainability, population distribution, agriculture

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average