

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Data from: Patterns and drivers of biodiversity-stability relationships under climate extremes
doi: 10.5061/dryad.6g8n1
handle: 10067/2098070151162165141
Data from: Patterns and drivers of biodiversity-stability relationships under climate extremes
Interactions between biodiversity loss and climate change present significant challenges for research, policy and management of ecosystems. Evidence suggests that high species diversity tends to increase plant community stability under interannual climate fluctuations and mild dry and wet events, but the overall pattern of diversity–stability relationships under climate extremes is unclear. We comprehensively review results from observational and experimental studies to assess the importance of diversity effects for ecosystem function under climate extremes. Both the broad literature review and a meta-analysis focused on the effects of extreme precipitation events on above-ground biomass reveal no significant interaction between species richness and climate extremes. Causes for variation in diversity effects under climate extremes are explored, from stress thresholds to biotic interactions and community assembly, and we consider how these may modulate the outcomes of biodiversity–stability relationships. We also examine how specific characteristics of climate extremes and timing of measurements may interact with mechanisms of diversity–stability relationships. Synthesis. Hypotheses tailored to the complexity of diversity effects, the implementation of standardised experiments and the use of trait-based biodiversity measures rather than species richness should lead to better causal understanding of whether and how biodiversity may protect ecosystems from adverse effects of climate extremes.
DeBoeck et al. meta-analysisData used in the meta-analysisDeBoecketalDryad.xlsx
- University of Antwerp Belgium
- National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment France
- University of Bayreuth Germany
- Bern University of Applied Sciences Switzerland
- University of Bern Switzerland
medicine and health care, insurance hypothesis, Life sciences, medicine and health care , Chemistry, Life Sciences, Medicine, Plant Community, Biology, Life sciences
medicine and health care, insurance hypothesis, Life sciences, medicine and health care , Chemistry, Life Sciences, Medicine, Plant Community, Biology, Life sciences
11 Research products, page 1 of 2
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2001IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average visibility views 7 download downloads 3 - 7views3downloads


