
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Rhizobacteria Mediate the Phytotoxicity of a Range of Biorefinery‐Relevant Compounds

AbstractAdvances in engineering biology have expanded the list of renewable compounds that can be produced at scale via biological routes from plant biomass. In most cases, these chemical products have not been evaluated for effects on biological systems, defined in the present study as bioactivity, that may be relevant to their manufacture. For sustainable chemical and fuel production, the industry needs to transition from fossil to renewable carbon sources, resulting in unprecedented expansion in the production and environmental distribution of chemicals used in biomanufacturing. Further, although some chemicals have been assessed for mammalian toxicity, environmental and agricultural hazards are largely unknown. We assessed 6 compounds that are representative of the emerging biofuel and bioproduct manufacturing process for their effect on model plants (Arabidopsis thaliana, Sorghum bicolor) and show that several alter plant seedling physiology at submillimolar concentrations. However, these responses change in the presence of individual bacterial species from the A. thaliana root microbiome. We identified 2 individual microbes that change the effect of chemical treatment on root architecture and a pooled microbial community with different effects relative to its constituents individually. The present study indicates that screening industrial chemicals for bioactivity on model organisms in the presence of their microbiomes is important for biologically and ecologically relevant risk analyses. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:1911–1922. © 2019 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.
- University of California System United States
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory United States
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory United States
- SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY
- Joint BioEnergy Institute United States
Arabidopsis, Toxicology screening, Ecotoxicology, Plant Roots, Industrial Biotechnology, Affordable and Clean Energy, Soil Pollutants, Biomass, Sorghum, Agriculture, Biological Sciences, Plants, Ionic liquids, Climate Action, Biofuels, Chemical Sciences, Microbiome, Responsible Consumption and Production, Environmental Sciences, Rhizobium
Arabidopsis, Toxicology screening, Ecotoxicology, Plant Roots, Industrial Biotechnology, Affordable and Clean Energy, Soil Pollutants, Biomass, Sorghum, Agriculture, Biological Sciences, Plants, Ionic liquids, Climate Action, Biofuels, Chemical Sciences, Microbiome, Responsible Consumption and Production, Environmental Sciences, Rhizobium
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).5 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
