
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Vulnerability of the Great Barrier Reef to climate change and local pressures


Kenneth R. N. Anthony

Nicholas H. Wolff

Michelle Devlin

Peter J. Mumby
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14043
pmid: 29420869
AbstractAustralia's Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is under pressure from a suite of stressors including cyclones, crown‐of‐thorns starfish (COTS), nutrients from river run‐off and warming events that drive mass coral bleaching. Two key questions are: how vulnerable will the GBR be to future environmental scenarios, and to what extent can local management actions lower vulnerability in the face of climate change? To address these questions, we use a simple empirical and mechanistic coral model to explore six scenarios that represent plausible combinations of climate change projections (from four Representative Concentration Pathways, RCPs), cyclones and local stressors. Projections (2017–2050) indicate significant potential for coral recovery in the near‐term, relative to current state, followed by climate‐driven decline. Under a scenario of unmitigated emissions (RCP8.5) and business‐as‐usual management of local stressors, mean coral cover on the GBR is predicted to recover over the next decade and then rapidly decline to only 3% by year 2050. In contrast, a scenario of strong carbon mitigation (RCP2.6) and improved water quality, predicts significant coral recovery over the next two decades, followed by a relatively modest climate‐driven decline that sustained coral cover above 26% by 2050. In an analysis of the impacts of cumulative stressors on coral cover relative to potential coral cover in the absence of such impacts, we found that GBR‐wide reef performance will decline 27%–74% depending on the scenario. Up to 66% of performance loss is attributable to local stressors. The potential for management to reduce vulnerability, measured here as the mean number of years coral cover can be kept above 30%, is spatially variable. Management strategies that alleviate cumulative impacts have the potential to reduce the vulnerability of some midshelf reefs in the central GBR by 83%, but only if combined with strong mitigation of carbon emissions.
- University of Queensland Australia
- University of East Anglia United Kingdom
- James Cook University Australia
- The Nature Conservancy United States
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science United Kingdom
Paris climate accord, 2300 Environmental Science, Climate Change, vulnerability, 2306 Global and Planetary Change, Acropora, water quality, 333, Water Quality, Pressure, Animals, Weather, Coral Reefs, Australia, bleaching, Anthozoa, cumulative stressors, 2304 Environmental Chemistry, coral reefs, 2303 Ecology
Paris climate accord, 2300 Environmental Science, Climate Change, vulnerability, 2306 Global and Planetary Change, Acropora, water quality, 333, Water Quality, Pressure, Animals, Weather, Coral Reefs, Australia, bleaching, Anthozoa, cumulative stressors, 2304 Environmental Chemistry, coral reefs, 2303 Ecology
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).93 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
