
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Species Richness and Carbon Footprints of Vegetable Oils: Can High Yields Outweigh Palm Oil’s Environmental Impact?

Palm oil has been widely criticised for its high environmental impacts, leading to calls to replace it with alternative vegetable oils in food and cosmetic products. However, substituting palm oil would be environmentally beneficial only if the environmental footprint per litre oil were lower than those of alternative vegetable oils. Whether this is the case is not obvious, given the high oil yields of oil palm of up to 10 times those of alternative crops. Here, we combine global agricultural and environmental datasets to show that, among the world’s seven major vegetable oil crops (oil palm, soybean, rapeseed, sunflower, groundnut, coconut, olive), oil palm has the lowest average species richness and carbon footprint associated with an annual production of one litre of vegetable oil. For each crop, these yield-adjusted footprints differ substantially between major producer countries, which we find to be largely the result of differences in crop management. Closing agricultural yield gaps of oil crops through improved management practices would significantly reduce the environmental footprints per oil yield. This would minimise the need for further land conversion to oil cropland and indeed could increase production to such an extent that a significant area of oil croplands could be ecologically restored.
- Harvard University United States
- Northern Arizona University United States
- University of Cambridge United Kingdom
- Northern Arizona University United States
TJ807-830, 30 Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences, yield gaps, 41 Environmental Sciences, TD194-195, environmental impact, Renewable energy sources, GE1-350, 2 Zero Hunger, biodiversity, Environmental effects of industries and plants, greenhouse gas emissions, 14 Life Below Water, 3004 Crop and Pasture Production, Environmental sciences, oil crops, 3002 Agriculture, Land and Farm Management, 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
TJ807-830, 30 Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences, yield gaps, 41 Environmental Sciences, TD194-195, environmental impact, Renewable energy sources, GE1-350, 2 Zero Hunger, biodiversity, Environmental effects of industries and plants, greenhouse gas emissions, 14 Life Below Water, 3004 Crop and Pasture Production, Environmental sciences, oil crops, 3002 Agriculture, Land and Farm Management, 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).14 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
